RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Vendaval -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 2:14:57 AM)

Hey NakedOnMyChain and the other moms, who work both in and out of the house.
Take a look at this recent study,
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060503/ts_nm/life_work_dc
"Study: US mothers deserve $134,121 in salary"
 
Regards,
 
-Vendaval-

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedOnMyChain

As a reply to quite a few people, do you think it's all fun and games to be a housewife?  This is hard work.  If you think it's all baking cookies, reading Better Homes and Gardens, and looking pretty all the time, you are sadly mistaken.  If you're childless you'll have a bit more time, but trust me, when all the responsibilities of running a household come squarely down to you, you're going to laugh that you ever thought it would be easy.





amayos -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 6:21:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ServiceNTucson

Umm "taking democracy away from the people" is, by definition, impossible.  Taking POWER away from the people is another thing in which case "democracy" doesn't exist.  The United States has never, thank Goddess, been a democracy.  The French Revolution did manage to briefly install a semblance of democracy, which descended almost immediately into terror, chaos and eventually dictatorship.

The Russian Revolution never came close to democracy, although the murderous thugs who led it, aka the Bolsheviks, liked to throw the word around a lot.  They pretty much went straight to the terror, chaos and dictatorship, the usual result of radical revolution.


Very well summed up. You managed to say in a few concise paragraphs what would have taken me an essay to accomplish.




cloudboy -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 6:46:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: amayos

The U.S. Constitution has lasted because it works.


Amayos maintains his Constitution by eating his vegetables.

BTW: Russia never had a DEMOCRACY, ever. Lenin, shortly after seizing power, disbanded the CONSTITUIONAL ASSEMBLY because he didn't want to share power. Down the road, rival political parties were then banned and liquidated.




amayos -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 7:27:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Amayos maintains his Constitution by eating his vegetables.



How did you know? [:D]





LadyMedhbh -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 10:36:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: danreeves

re-you're right kitty-men-you can't live with em--you can't shoot em


OR... men... you can't live with them, can't fit more than two in a trunk.

This whole discussion is rather pointless since people are going to believe whatever the hell they want to believe. 





plantlady64 -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 11:45:14 AM)

quote:

So you are saying what happened many years ago, (most males of today were not even born than either were most females in this generation) men of today should be punished for what happen back in that time? Does that mean all Germans should be punished today for what Hilter did in WW2? Nothing personal, just curious. I just find this concept that many women have to be illogical. [/qoute]

Hi Naughty Nick,
No what I stated was this IS STILL a male supreme society still today in the year 2006. Female supremacy just means to me a woman has come out from under that opinion and finds herself in her position based on personality and not gender.
Some men are supreme and some woman are too. For a man in 2006 most of the time that's assumed without a statement, for woman it rarely is.
Suzanne




naughtynick -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 12:22:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: plantlady64

quote:

So you are saying what happened many years ago, (most males of today were not even born than either were most females in this generation) men of today should be punished for what happen back in that time? Does that mean all Germans should be punished today for what Hilter did in WW2? Nothing personal, just curious. I just find this concept that many women have to be illogical. [/qoute]

Hi Naughty Nick,
No what I stated was this IS STILL a male supreme society still today in the year 2006. Female supremacy just means to me a woman has come out from under that opinion and finds herself in her position based on personality and not gender.
Some men are supreme and some woman are too. For a man in 2006 most of the time that's assumed without a statement, for woman it rarely is.
Suzanne


This is still a male supremacy society? Haha I don't think so. Maybe in the middle east or in asian countries. Definitely not Australia and America. It is women who are getting the double standards in our laws, I don't call that a male dominated society.




KittenWithaTwist -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 12:59:20 PM)

Nick,

Men make the laws. Men rule the country. Men hold most public and private government offices. Men hold most of the CEO positions. Men control most of the airplanes, automobilies, roads, boats, water, and land. Men control most of the airwaves and radio waves. They control and direct most of what goes on tv, is heard on the radio, and plays in our movie theaters and live theaters. Man invented the bra, the panty, and the high heeled shoe.

The male human runs most of the United States-I'd estimate that at least 65 to 75% of it is entirely controlled by the adult white upper class protestant male. That male (or those males) run our stocks, control our economy, and start/end/fight in our wars.

Despite the small steps that the feminist movement and civil rights movement and equal rights movement have taken, we are still run by white upper class protestant males. Women have the right to vote, but it is still the electoral college that counts. Women can have the same jobs (sometimes), but still make 70 cents to the dollar. Women may have a career, but are still expected to make babies and stay home to care for them. Women may enjoy sex freely, but are still labeled as sluts or whores for doing so (and not in the good way).

The United States is run by men. Your personal small existence may be run by your female companion, but the rest of the country is not. And to believe otherwise is to dig yourself a very large hole.




Lordandmaster -> RE: Why is female supremacy accepted but not male supremacy? (5/4/2006 3:31:38 PM)

Come on.  "Males" don't run anything.  PEOPLE do.  We are not all simply exponents of our gender.

And what does this statement mean?

quote:

Women have the right to vote, but it is still the electoral college that counts.


How many electoral votes belong to states with male majorities, and how many to states with female majorities?

Case closed.  People get what they vote for.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125