RE: False flag nuclear attack? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moritarion -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:28:55 AM)

Oh yeah, American government has even experimented on it's own citizens before with the Tuskagee syphilis experiment as well. It's all utterly shocking really. Tried typing "tpb nuclear false flag attack" but nowt about TPB came up at all.




tweakabelle -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:29:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

The recent invention of an invisibility cloak offers terrorists and suicide bombers in particular a defence against exposure and capture that has left law enforcement circles 'reeling' with shock and anger.

"How are we supposed to pick them out in a crowd now?" demanded Sgt A N Tibombar of the crack Seattle anti-terrorist squad. "This is fiendish. Pure Evil. There's no defence against an invisible nuclear bomb. Seattle doesn't stand a chance now."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-claim-to-have-created-invisibility-cloak-2201667.html


Edited with an invisible hand using invisible ink[8|]


invisibility? LOL

who needs to be invisible when a li6 nuke is the size of a fucking softball?


Well may you scoff.

But I'll bet you won't be spending any time in Seattle in the near future.




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:30:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Except that you have absolutely no credible proof of these assertions (lol, like that is something new).

Are you saying this again? 


you mean like sticking one up your ass and pulling the rip cord?  LMAO

get real.  you are joking right?

they were the size of large thermos bottles in 1965, whats so hard to wrap your mind around that?

Hell they are even directional dispersion patterns now for shhhh.... "demolition".....




mnottertail -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:33:43 AM)

Like I said, no evidence, no proof, nothing but insane and imbicilic babbling.




Rule -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:33:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moritarion
Tried typing "tpb nuclear false flag attack" but nowt about TPB came up at all.

That is because you did not follow directions.




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:34:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moritarion

Oh yeah, American government has even experimented on it's own citizens before with the Tuskagee syphilis experiment as well. It's all utterly shocking really. Tried typing "tpb nuclear false flag attack" but nowt about TPB came up at all.


not only americans but canadians as well.  I forget what it was, ddt maybe?  dont remember but both canadians and americans sued the shit out of them for it too.

Fortunately the taxpayers dont mind paying for it.






pahunkboy -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:34:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Except that you have absolutely no credible proof of these assertions (lol, like that is something new).

Are you saying this again? 


You are on too many medications.




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:37:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Except that you have absolutely no credible proof of these assertions (lol, like that is something new).

Are you saying this again? 


You are on too many medications.



his dick was shot off in the war.

I dont know if he is that far detached from the world and serious or if he just like to be made a fool of all the time.

http://books.google.com/books?id=u2lEX5V2kfIC&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=li6+nukes&source=bl&ots=u2-pFYBN59&sig=qWBxvKIEIebJ8PNsiwSNOhvqyno&hl=en&ei=uYdJTZLCEYHGlQeI8LE1&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

maybe both.







mnottertail -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:41:23 AM)

precisely, as I said, not one shred of credible proof. 




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:46:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

precisely, as I said, not one shred of credible proof. 


If it was up your ass would it be credible?


Lithium Production
Lithium is a very low-density metal, prone to spontaneous combustion. On the periodic table of the elements it lies directly beneath hydrogen and has but three protons. It is the lightest solid element, with a density only about half that of water. Lithium is silvery in appearance, much like Na and K, other members of the alkali metal series. It reacts with water, but not as vigorously as sodium. Lithium imparts a beautiful crimson color to a flame, but when the metal burns strongly, the flame is a dazzling white. The most common stable isotope is Lithium-7, consisting of three protons and four neutrons; less common, comprising 7.4 percent of normal lithium, is Lithium-6, which has three protons and three neutrons in its nucleus. Since World War II, the production of lithium metal and its compounds has increased greatly. Because the metal has the highest specific heat of any solid element, it has found use in heat transfer applications; however, it is corrosive and requires special handling. The metal has been used as an alloying agent, is of interest in synthesis of organic compounds, and has nuclear applications. It ranks as a leading contender as a battery anode material as it has a high electrochemical potential. Lithium is used in special glasses and ceramics. The glass for the 200-inch telescope at Mt. Palomar contains lithium as a minor ingredient. Lithium chloride is one of the most lyproscopic materials known, and it, as well as lithium bromide, is used in air conditioning and industrial drying systems. Lithium stearate is used as an all-purpose and high-temperature lubricant. Other lithium compounds are used in dry cells and storage batteries. Lithium [Li] is a critical material for the manufacture of the secondaries of so-called dry thermonuclear devices, which do not require the use of liquid deuterium and tritium. The largest nuclear device ever detonated was a multi-stage Soviet product with a yield of nearly 60 megatons. It was exploded at only half of its design maximum yield of about 100 megatons. Lithium enriched in the isotope Lithium-6 remains a controlled material because of its utility in the production of compact and highly efficient thermonuclear secondaries. Two-stage nuclear weapons incorporating a lithium-deuteride-fueled component can deliver greater nuclear yield from a smaller and lighter package than if a pure fission device were used. The tradeoff is that the design and construction of reliable two-stage �dry� weapons may require significant knowledge of nuclear weapons physics and technology, knowledge which is hard to acquire without a program involving full-yield testing of the fission primary to be used and measurement of its production of x-rays and their transport through a case surrounding both primary and secondary stages. Therefore, Lithium-6 is more likely to be of interest to a state with nuclear weapons experience than it is to a beginning nuclear state. Lithium-6 is most often separated from natural lithium by the COLEX (Column exchange) electrochemical process, which exploits the fact that Lithium-6 has a greater affinity for mercury than does Lithium-7. A lithium-mercury amalgam is first prepared using the natural material. The amalgam is then agitated with a lithium hydroxide solution, also prepared from natural lithium. The desired Lithium-6 concentrates in the amalgam, and the more common Lithium-7 migrates to the hydroxide. A counter flow of amalgam and hydroxide passes through a cascade of stages until the desired enrichment in Lithium-6 is reached. The Lithium-6 product can be separated from the amalgam, and the �tails� fraction of Lithium-7 electrolyzed from the aqueous lithium hydroxide solution. The mercury is recovered and can be reused with fresh feedstock. Russia, the UK, France, and China are all believed to be capable of making Lithium-6 in the quantities needed for the manufacture of large nuclear stockpiles.

Russia exploded a device making use of Lithium-6 before the United States did; however, the Soviet device was not a �true� thermonuclear weapon capable of being scaled to any desired yield. United States production of 6Li ceased in 1963.

We believe that! really we do!  Honest!  Heart and soul!  [8|]  LMAO
Sources and Methods
  • Adapted from - Nuclear Weapons Technology Militarily Critical Technologies List (MCTL) Part II: Weapons of Mass Destruction Technologies




tweakabelle -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:47:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

not only americans but canadians as well.  I forget what it was, ddt maybe?  dont remember but both canadians and americans sued the shit out of them for it too.

Fortunately the taxpayers dont mind paying for it.


Need I remind you that Seattle is close to the Canadian border?

You've been warned. Just don't blame me if you get suckered in Seattle




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:49:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

not only americans but canadians as well.  I forget what it was, ddt maybe?  dont remember but both canadians and americans sued the shit out of them for it too.

Fortunately the taxpayers dont mind paying for it.


Need I remind you that Seattle is close to the Canadian border?

You've been warned. Just don't blame me if you get suckered in Seattle


OH?  Was that in your area?




pahunkboy -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:49:20 AM)

What a better way- to kill 2 birds with one stone.   People in 2 countries can be frightened of their one shadow- and god forbid if someone sneezes. 




tweakabelle -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:53:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

What a better way- to kill 2 birds with one stone.   People in 2 countries can be frightened of their one shadow- and god forbid if someone sneezes. 


Fiendish isn't it?




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 8:59:02 AM)



its amazing what a little fear can do [real or imagined]




Moritarion -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 9:16:18 AM)

I wouldn't consider the directions of a person who asks if the biggest financial centre of the world can be backed up reliable. It is international financial infrastructure - not a hard disk drive. [;)]




Rule -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 9:31:22 AM)

That evokes to questions:
1. Why did you ask for directions - twice.
2. Why do you complain.




pahunkboy -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 10:01:07 AM)

Why did they punch Anderson Cooper 10x in the head this week- if we stand for nothing but peace?




Real0ne -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 10:04:06 AM)

because they can?




pahunkboy -> RE: False flag nuclear attack? (2/2/2011 10:06:01 AM)

CNN Anderson Cooper 'punched 10 times in head' by mob in Egypt....




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875