RE: SCOTT WALKER for President

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President

Page: << < prev 34 35 [36] 37 38 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 11:37:55 AM

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

Heard someone contacted the State about recall. They are stuck with Walker until Jan, 2012. I hope the man enjoys the time he has left in the mansion.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to rulemylife)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 11:42:50 AM

Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Bubba, I think if you have a deficit or unfunded mandates that you should create a revenue stream to do that. We can fuck around the issue and try to ignore it. We can let you try to save ourselves out of it and destroy the fabric of the land or we can be honest and start to collect taxes to get us back on track.

One question, if what you say is true that business goes away with any tax increase....how do you explain the 1990's with the largest tax increase in history?

I love how the insults come out when someone says they're tired of paying other people's way. There IS NO right to a higher wage or to higher benefits. That is the problem with the public sector union mentality, especially teachers and bureaucrats...it GETS to be a rights thing in their brains. The "rights" to benefits were legislated to them...and now the folks behind the legislation (read that as taxpayers a.k.a. the teachers' bosses) have decided they are paying too much for what they are getting. There is NO right to stick your hand into someone else's pocket and say "you earned it but I have the right to it".

Wow,,,,,,great rant. Now how about replying to what I asked you. If all you said was true before. How do you explain the prosperity of the 1990's on the back of the largest tax increase in history.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 12:23:22 PM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Bubba, I think if you have a deficit or unfunded mandates that you should create a revenue stream to do that. We can fuck around the issue and try to ignore it. We can let you try to save ourselves out of it and destroy the fabric of the land or we can be honest and start to collect taxes to get us back on track.

One question, if what you say is true that business goes away with any tax increase....how do you explain the 1990's with the largest tax increase in history?

I love how the insults come out when someone says they're tired of paying other people's way. There IS NO right to a higher wage or to higher benefits. That is the problem with the public sector union mentality, especially teachers and bureaucrats...it GETS to be a rights thing in their brains. The "rights" to benefits were legislated to them...and now the folks behind the legislation (read that as taxpayers a.k.a. the teachers' bosses) have decided they are paying too much for what they are getting. There is NO right to stick your hand into someone else's pocket and say "you earned it but I have the right to it".

Wow,,,,,,great rant. Now how about replying to what I asked you. If all you said was true before. How do you explain the prosperity of the 1990's on the back of the largest tax increase in history.

As I've told you before...I am tired of answering questions when I do not get a response to what I post. When you do post a response in reply to something I have stated, I am perfectly willing to go along with a give and take. But when you insult me and pay no attention to what I have stated and think I am going to answer your questions...sorry, you are neither my teacher nor my boss.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 12:49:58 PM

Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline

lol.....edited.....

< Message edited by DomYngBlk -- 2/24/2011 1:13:22 PM >

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 2:34:34 PM

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Not by the unions, no. Oddly enough, the majority of Wisconsin voters...you know, the ones paying for the public sector's wage/benefit packages?...DID elect him and stand behind him.

That would seem to be in question.

Protesting means all-night stays at the Capitol for some people

Scott Walker Rejects Compromise Proposal As Protests Continue

Wis. governor refuses to give in to protests - USATODAY.com

But really, I have to ask this question.

Why do conservatives do this?

Is it because you become brainwashed listening to FOX News?

Really, I don't understand how you can seriously dispute what is right in front of your face.

Right in front of Governor Walker's face are public sector employees from Wisconsin...and those trucked in from other states...as well as those protesters that the D.N.C. rounded up to join the fray.

People that go to work? They showed up on the weekend when they did not have to go to work to support themselves AND the protesters.

And didnt need fraudulent doctors' notes.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 3:41:45 PM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

well, them fraudulent doctors are moving to puerto rico anyhow, ain't they? How is that move going, oh bookkeeper to itinerant insurance peddlers?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/24/2011 3:49:08 PM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Another thing, are they docking this fucksticks pay for all the time he is wasting in unethical conversations, and other timewasting grandstanding not doing the states business? Hes got that Koch thing, hes got that inability to explain the yearly vote and the illegal abrogation of collective bargaining thing........

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 6:31:09 AM

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

This is pretty good - caught them napping:

quote:

MADISON, Wis. – Republicans in the Wisconsin Assembly took the first significant action on their plan to strip collective bargaining rights from most public workers, abruptly passing the measure early Friday morning before sleep-deprived Democrats realized what was happening.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 6:50:54 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yellow journalism, nobody napping. Moving to the senate has accomplished nothing, since both houses must vote and reconcile. They are simply widening the war, much like hitlers rather ill advised foray into russia when he already wasn't doing very well to the west of him.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 6:55:18 AM

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

The people who should be docked their pay are the 14 democratic senators who have been on the lam in Illinois for 10 days doing nothing.

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 7:02:58 AM

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Yeah, lets see. We can go by whats written in an Associated Press article, or we can take the word of some mnottertail fella who often spouts infantile gobblydgook that no one can possibly understand.

Heh heh heh heh heh... not a hard call to make, that one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yellow journalism, nobody napping. Moving to the senate has accomplished nothing, since both houses must vote and reconcile. They are simply widening the war, much like hitlers rather ill advised foray into russia when he already wasn't doing very well to the west of him.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 7:12:41 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Or you can come out of your rushfelching induced coma look around you, and read the article and see that mirable dictu, they passed it on to the senate from the assembly (no surprises there) and the senate will not be able to take it up since a great deal of senators are out of town on business, also, no surprise there.

This is all very well known, its been in the news lately.

Now, you may not have been aware that the assembly had been debating this, but most of the rest of the world was. The majority at the outset said that they weren't interested in real debate they were going thru the motions and passing it on as is.

You might want to stop and catch up on some reading so you can discuss the issues around here knowledgeably, I know you want to be seen as an intellect, but...this sort of thing does not further your cause. It appears to be prisonplanet link like spamming of forum topics.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/25/2011 7:44:56 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 8:45:41 AM

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

This is pretty good - caught them napping:

quote:

MADISON, Wis. – Republicans in the Wisconsin Assembly took the first significant action on their plan to strip collective bargaining rights from most public workers, abruptly passing the measure early Friday morning before sleep-deprived Democrats realized what was happening.

Is that your new avatar?

(in reply to Sanity)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 8:51:25 AM

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

No, his self-portrait.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to rulemylife)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 1:12:45 PM

Posts: 94
Joined: 8/31/2009
Status: offline

What really is shameful about the whole 'Union busting' Budget Repair Bill... is that (apart from 'union busting' which has nothing to do with a budget) why is there a No-bid contract for sale of public property... why is that included in a Budget Repair Bill... if we are so much concerned about money, let there be a proper-open public auction... if not, stop the charade of being fiscally responsible...

ref...
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/JR1SB-11.pdf
pg. 24.

"16.896 Sale or contractual operation of state−owned heating, cooling, and power plants. (1) Notwithstanding ss. 13.48 (14) (am) and 16.705 (1), the department may sell any state−owned heating, cooling, and power plant or may contract with a private entity for the operation of any such plant, with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount that the department determines to be in the best interest of the state. Notwithstanding ss. 196.49 and 196.80, no approval or certification of the public service commission is necessary for a public utility to purchase, or contract for the operation of, such a plant, and any such purchase is considered to be in the public interest and to comply with the criteria for certification of a project under s. 196.49 (3) (b)."

< Message edited by marshalp -- 2/25/2011 1:15:56 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 1:44:03 PM

Posts: 791
Joined: 5/30/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marshalp

why is there a No-bid contract for sale of public property...

Somebody has to engage the mechanism to transfer wealth (assets) from the people (state) to rich, private, campaign-contributing, business owners at a non-competitive low cost.

You know, the funny thing is, I was told that the only transfer of wealth that happens in this country is the version FROM the rich TO the poor, and coincidentally it always happens under a Democrat's watch. I know, because someone told me about it on these very forums!

And Sanity thinks only Dems engage in sweetheart deals!

< Message edited by EternalHoH -- 2/25/2011 1:47:51 PM >

(in reply to marshalp)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 5:13:29 PM

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EternalHoH

quote:

ORIGINAL: marshalp

why is there a No-bid contract for sale of public property...

Somebody has to engage the mechanism to transfer wealth (assets) from the people (state) to rich, private, campaign-contributing, business owners at a non-competitive low cost.

You know, the funny thing is, I was told that the only transfer of wealth that happens in this country is the version FROM the rich TO the poor, and coincidentally it always happens under a Democrat's watch. I know, because someone told me about it on these very forums!

And Sanity thinks only Dems engage in sweetheart deals!

You should be grateful that you can make a living by those who let some pee run down their legs.

If it didn't trickle down to you it would only end up in the sewer.

(in reply to EternalHoH)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 10:40:45 PM

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

why is there a No-bid contract for sale of public property

Koch Brothers.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to marshalp)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/25/2011 10:51:09 PM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Ya talk about the guys behind the NWO!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)

RE: SCOTT WALKER for President - 2/27/2011 11:36:50 PM

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

Protesters exploded with cheers when it was announced that Sen. Dale Schultz, a Republican who represents southwest Wisconsin and had tried to come up with a compromise budget-repair bill, would not vote for Walker's plans. Calls to Schultz's office Sunday night were not immediately returned.

http://www.freep.com/article/20110228/NEWS07/102280346

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Page: << < prev 34 35 [36] 37 38 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: SCOTT WALKER for President

Page: << < prev 34 35 [36] 37 38 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.141