RE: Why No Queening? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


thedesigner -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 9:23:19 AM)

Making your own, well done, I design the furniture you'll find on www.queensandkings.biz  If I can offer any tips...drop a line...hmm...a rocker...good plan...happy queening!




thedesigner -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 9:26:51 AM)

Hey Mistress Imp, thanks for the compliment...and the mention of my site...those designs are mine...many more to come. xx




crouchingtigress -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 10:19:39 AM)

Same here! Cane weave chairs are already perfect, good support, easy to remove the cane, and it only takes a stapler to make it cozy and a saw to make it reach....
 
But I have to say  NDB, leaving it a rocker? WOW Brilliant...I think the queening chair manufacturers should sit up (pun intended) and take notice!
 
 
~Tigress

quote:

ORIGINAL: newdombbw

MistressLorelei:

I'm halfway through making my own chair.  I found a real cute wooden adolescent's rocking chair at a thrift store - had a cane seat.  Cut out the caning, wrapped sides, front and back in cotton batting and taped.  Now have to cover with vinyl and put a sling beneath (along with a place to clip his cuffs).

I'm leaving it a rocker <grin>






crouchingtigress -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 10:24:11 AM)

Oh wow I just saw your post, [;)]
 
Great site, lovely workmanship and beautiful pictures. Good luck with that!




MistressSassy66 -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 10:31:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

One thing I've noticed is that male subs seem to make many more fetish-oriented demands of their dommes than female subs do.  A domme is a PERSON.  She's not a vulva between two legs to be placed on top of your face.  My guess would be that lifestyle dommes don't list queening because they're not interested in subs who are just looking for an outlet for naughty fantasies.



Exactly.
I may have seperate rules for no touching with the Pro side compared to the private D/s relationships I have.But the profile is the same.For those looking for just some "fun"





TedEbear -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 6:31:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLina

Queening or face-sitting often turns into the sub attempting to daty (dine at the y).
Some people aren't comfortable with that amount of intimacy or closeness until they know someone better, some people will do it with anyone. Like all things, it can run the gamut.
For me its not on my profile (as far as I can remember that is...) because I don't want people coming to me just to try getting in my pants...literally.



First I will admit that I haven't read th entire thread before responding.

Queening, A.K.A. (Also known as), Face sitting. Variant forms, panty or thong smothering may include ass smothering(3). Akin to crowning(1). Typically, but not limited to where the female seats her full body weight on the submisives face. Specifically with her crotch on the submisives mouth. The submissive being of either gender who may or may not be in bondage at the time of the act. Also referred to as edge play, breath play. Inexperienced persons quickly assosiate the activity with oral sex, however in a BDSM context a thong is typically worn by the dominant between casual play partners. Is often done in conjunction with cbt such as a "wild ride"(2). Note, the female may (un)intentionally achieve climax during the act of queening.

Customery position; Obverse - crotch on mouth with pelvic area pressed up against nose. Thies will pinch nostrils closed. Reverse - crotch on mouth with nose between cheeks. Side sattle - seated with both legs on the same side of submissives face.

1. Crowning, typically the female seats herself a bit farther up on the submissives face, with nose between her cheecks, keeping the mouth free. For the purpose of allowing the submissive, either gender, to provide oral genital service resaulting in climax.

2. Wild ride. Female dominant face sits submisive partner, either gender, and whips the submisives genitalia, causing the submisive to thrash about, hence the term "wild ride". In extreme, or edge play, the activity concludes with the dominat partner achieving climax through the submisive partners vocalizations of pain providing direct stimulation to the genitalia of the dominant partner. Warning this is edge play, and may cause permant harm and or injury to the submive including death. Note: a variation on the wild ride may include ECBT. The use of a TENS unit, as the dominat partner you need to make certain that you are insulated prior to pressing the button. Basic electron flow theory will indicate that the dominant partner may find herself getting a very surprising jolt to her genitalia when she presses the button.

3. Ass smoother, akin to face sitting. Specifically were the ass of the dominant is seated on the submisive. With the mouth and nose between the cheeks. Thong or panty is typically worn between casual play partner.





TedEbear -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/11/2006 6:34:33 PM)

As a side bar the first pro I talked into trying it admitted that she actually enjoyed very much. She at first was against the idea.




MarinaBlack -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/12/2006 1:56:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rumtiger

So....is it that dommes are into queening but they simply dont put it down cause maybe they do it a different way? Or cause they really dont like it or...blah.

Maybe I just live in the wrong state? lol


There are so many potential varieties of D/s relationships. Thak goodness for variety.
The kind that I and many other Dommes seek in places like collarme is what I refer to as a Mistress/servant relationship. This manner of relationship is formal, has a stringent set of protocols and does not involve overt sexual interaction - let's face it, we all know he's getting excited when polishing our boots, but...

I know that many Ladies do, in fact LOVE Queening, but many reserve this for their Signifigant Others while still seeking Mistress/servant relationships with others.
Many of the Ladies here already have signifigant others.

I do very much enjoy this with my slave/husband, but I don't go near the subject with my butler - my servant. He's for other purposes and fulfills other fetishes.

Another Lady who posted to this thread suggested that many Ladies simply do not wish to include "wanker bait" on their profiles. A very sound idea. As is, so many of us will get a multitude of useless messages from men who don't come near to fulfilling what we do include in our profiles simply because it turns them on to communicate with ANY Domme.
I probably spend more time hitting the delete button than I do engaging in communication with potentials - most approaches aren't even worth a polite "Thanks, but no thanks".

You'd be amazed what some men think they can write to a total stranger because of the anonymity to Internet provides. They'd be getting arrested for seual harrassment were these approaches in Real Life.

Don't give up the search. There's someone for everybody and you will eventually find the Lady of your dreams. Be honest and clear in your profile, approach politely, reply politely and honestly. When approaching always mention what it was about the Lady's profile that moved you and what you think it is about you that could make you a good potential.

Hope this helps.

Ms. Marina Black
Strict Dominant Sadist
www.servemarinablack.com




Najakcharmer -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/12/2006 6:48:02 PM)

Being a fairly normal and healthy person, I enjoy sex and other intimate activities along with my kink.  However, it would be ice skating weather in Hell before I put this on my profile.  The inevitable result would be that everyone and his dirty old grandpa would be emailing me, assuming that I wanted to do that stuff with them.

There's lots of things I like to do.  But I'm awfully picky about who I do it with, so I won't be broadcasting any of my more intimate interests to people who will use this as an excuse to email me with crude, explicit and graphic sexual offers.  With photos of their pink parts.  Yukky.




Rumtiger -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/12/2006 6:51:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Najakcharmer

I won't be broadcasting any of my more intimate interests to people who will use this as an excuse to email me with crude, explicit and graphic sexual offers.  With photos of their pink parts.  Yukky.



...Pink parts? ::goes and takes a look:: if its pink I think theres something rather wrong there..and you shouldent want the thing near you in that case anyway lol.




NikkiAnn -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/14/2006 5:10:28 PM)

 
   I am a sub that more interesed in a relationship. Not that I don't have any fantasies, that would be a lie, but they are not on my list of needs. Unfortunately I have a hard time finding a Mistress interested in a realtionship with someone like me. I would never demand anything of a Mistress. I have a lot to offer and not many needs.

Submissively,

Nikki Ann




Najakcharmer -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/14/2006 8:02:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NikkiAnn

  I am a sub that more interesed in a relationship. Not that I don't have any fantasies, that would be a lie, but they are not on my list of needs. Unfortunately I have a hard time finding a Mistress interested in a realtionship with someone like me. I would never demand anything of a Mistress. I have a lot to offer and not many needs.


Biggest problem is that it's a wide world out there.  A science fiction reading, Ren Faire going T-girl subbie would stand a very good chance indeed of being on my personal play list, but the commute isn't a happening thing and I'm not willing to do an LDR or relocate anybody. 

No idea what the community is like in your area, but I'm thinking you might do very well indeed meeting simpatico people on the sci-fi convention kink party circuit in the bigger cities. 






MoonGoddessIsis -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/18/2006 8:48:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

One thing I've noticed is that male subs seem to make many more fetish-oriented demands of their dommes than female subs do.  A domme is a PERSON.  She's not a vulva between two legs to be placed on top of your face.  My guess would be that lifestyle dommes don't list queening because they're not interested in subs who are just looking for an outlet for naughty fantasies.


OHHHHH how I loved this post!  You are so right!

Lady Moon




yourMissTress -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/18/2006 8:57:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

One thing I've noticed is that male subs seem to make many more fetish-oriented demands of their dommes than female subs do.  A domme is a PERSON.  She's not a vulva between two legs to be placed on top of your face.  My guess would be that lifestyle dommes don't list queening because they're not interested in subs who are just looking for an outlet for naughty fantasies.


Exactly Lam...or as I like to say...I am not a life support system for the fetishes of submissive males.




MstrssSatin -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/19/2006 6:26:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rumtiger

I was just curious, when looking at profiles, I find that most dommes or switches do not put queening in thier lists, some even put it down in the hate or dislike category. So I was wondering, why is there such a large percentage of dommes who do not like this act?




Hhmm... I'm quite fond of Queening. The male chest and stomach make an excellent table. Its My favorite place to sit on a Saturday morning to enjoy my coffee and morning paper. The hollow between his breast is an excellent spot for my coffee cup and his stomach a wonderful spot to spread out the newspaper and see what's happening in the world. [;)]




TeeGO -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/19/2006 9:58:18 AM)

YIKES!  It's posts like that one that make practicing control of oneself a difficult thing.




malakas -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/31/2006 1:55:23 AM)

Here are queening stools in various models for various tastes - none cheap - made by an English outfit:  http://www.tickleberry.co.uk/pages/queening.html

And if you're often on the go, you can opt for a "pack away" queening stool:  http://www.queensandkings.biz/queensandkingswebsite/HTML_files/flatpack_chair.htm




JessicaLashes -> RE: Why No Queening? (5/31/2006 3:58:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rumtiger

I was just curious, when looking at profiles, I find that most dommes or switches do not put queening in thier lists, some even put it down in the hate or dislike category. So I was wondering, why is there such a large percentage of dommes who do not like this act?




I queen my subs/slaves.  Because I know that men want to get close to pussy.  My lesbian girlfriends are the same way.  To me it's more like rubbing their nose in my pussy just to let them know who is in control.  However I always wear my smallest thong I can squeeze into when I face sit someone, unless they are special friends and they have consented to bare back queening.




bschwimmer -> RE: Why No Queening? (12/28/2006 6:57:52 AM)

great idea
love the rocker idea tel me how it works




KaramelGoddess -> RE: Why No Queening? (12/28/2006 5:20:35 PM)

I adore Queening...not just for the erotic aspect but for Me it is the most submissive position a man can be in, in order to please his Domina.  I find I have a better orgasm while Queening if I am cropping or flogging the slut beneath Me during. [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
1.621094