RE: Online Relationships (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


ThornBlood -> RE: Online Relationships (10/10/2004 11:45:18 PM)


quote:

Just think ladies, it's late at night, and you are cyber subbing to this really handsome guy, and he sends you his photo.......................


Course.. it might be the subbie I'm talkin' to also.




cynnacent1 -> RE: Online Relationships (10/11/2004 5:47:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThornBlood


quote:

Just think ladies, it's late at night, and you are cyber subbing to this really handsome guy, and he sends you his photo.......................


Course.. it might be the subbie I'm talkin' to also.


Yes, of course it may be, good point ThornBlood !

And she sends you her photo.......................


[image]http://www.shearologist.com/what-men-want-1.jpg[/image]




Mercnbeth -> RE: Online Relationships (10/11/2004 10:13:27 AM)

ThornBlood -

My major issue with 'on-liners' isn't intolerance. I understand and appreciate that games and imaginary play are a very important part of some people's lives. I'll even agree it is a great way to be introduced to the lifestyle, and the possibility of experiencing it real time.
No, my issue is having never tasted "pizza" (since you loved that reference so much) on-liners are telling others what's so good or bad about it, and even handing out recipes that must be followed exactly in order to play in their world. Talk about intolerance, I've come in contact with many more people who were thrown out of on-line chat rooms and discussion groups then I've ever met who said they were thrown out of a munch, real time group, party, or club.
There are many reasons and rationalizations for being on-line only. What I am intolerant of is people who 'never tasting it' but are self identified experts giving advise on what it tastes like or even how to make it. To me that's just being intolerant of someone who misrepresents. Of that - I am Guilty!

How convenient to have 'misrepresent' as a politically correct manner of saying someone is a liar!




slaveredflame -> RE: Online Relationships (10/11/2004 10:27:24 AM)

hi
i am 33 male slave seeking Domnate Mistress
i am very submissive and obedient
i prefer to serve as a slave-husband meaning i am being married to my Mistress also i may try to be a a male slave owned by a Master if i find a Master Who want to use me





slaveredflame -> RE: Online Relationships (10/11/2004 10:28:25 AM)

hi
i am 33 male slave seeking Domnate Mistress
i am very submissive and obedient
i prefer to serve as a slave-husband meaning i am being married to my Mistress also i may try to be a a male slave owned by a Master if i find a Master Who want to use me





Mercnbeth -> RE: Online Relationships (10/11/2004 11:01:02 AM)

Suleiman,
Thanks for the lesson. I stopped playing on-line or video games of any kind a long ago when my 7 year old son could kick my ass in any of them. I do remember a period of his "Magic" cards but even after that was described to me 100 times by him, I didn't get it. Interesting enough he was able to sell his 'valuable' cards for a paint-ball gun when he turned 16. Is that the equivalent of going from 'on-line' to real time in the gaming world?

Now, having destroyed way to many brain cells and with approaching senility, I couldn't remember all the rules of any of the role-play games, even if I wanted to play.

quote:

Every group has a certain degree of disdain for other subsets of their same community.


I was completely unaware that D&D was a subset of our community, must have missed that memo.

I don't solicit any respect or need any respect. Like trust, respect is earned. Insisting, "You better respect me!"; is a sure way NOT to be respected. I have a sense of humor, and if something is silly of funny to me, I'll point it our or use it as a reference to make a point. That perspective alone doesn't indicate disrespect or intolerance.

Take a look at the picture below my name. What could be sillier then a grown man and woman walking public streets dressed that way with the woman on the end of a leash held by the man. Funny, ridiculous, offensive, and definitely NOT politically correct in this society. And you know what, if someone walked up and told me that during that day - I'd smile, maybe even laugh, agree with them, and walk on. Why? Two reasons, one, because they don't understand and nothing I could tell them in that confrontation would change them or me. And more important #2 - I wouldn't care, because I DON'T have to justify it to myself. My confidence as to what I am, who I am, allows me to ignore those without that perspective. It's not a manner of respect.

Bub (aka Merc)




Sinergy -> RE: Online Relationships (10/12/2004 8:57:55 PM)

quote:

hi
i am 33 male slave seeking Domnate Mistress
i am very submissive and obedient
i prefer to serve as a slave-husband meaning i am being married to my Mistress also i may try to be a a male slave owned by a Master if i find a Master Who want to use me


Well, since you asked, I would like to break this down.

Domnate is not a word. Dominate is a verb, and as such is not appropriate to use describing a vowel (Mistress). You may want a Mistress to dominate you, but dominate Mistress would be like somebody describing you as a "submit slave." The word you are looking for is the adjective "Dominant" to describe the one you seek.

Secondly, I would recommend that you work on your writing skills as these are the first impression you make on those you are seeking. I suggest you read more, learn about different things, and pay attention to how other people use the English language.

Spend a little time with what you post on-line, because once you post those words cannot be taken back. The maxim I read once was "think twice, post once" to describe sending posts to a web site.

I could comment on the trollish nature of the entire post, but presumably you will be so kind as to also mention your desires on your profile and leave it at that.

Good luck in your search,

Sinergy




Sinergy -> RE: Online Relationships (10/12/2004 9:00:24 PM)

quote:

I was completely unaware that D&D was a subset of our community, must have missed that memo.


It is a pleasure to read your posts, but I felt the need to respond.

And on a more smart-assed, tongue in cheek note...

There are two groups of people.

People who divide people into two groups of people.

People who dont.

Please make a note of this valuable life tip.

Just me, could be wrong, but there you go.

Sinergy




DiamondDiva -> RE: Online Relationships (10/12/2004 9:02:23 PM)

Ewwww @ insidey LOL





stormiKnightBEAR -> RE: Online Relationships (10/14/2004 4:53:52 AM)

ThornBlood,

While this girl agrees with some of what you said, it seems that even in your workplace those fellows
are still going home or to the person they are corresponding with. To this girl, even those that are in the
military corresponding back and forth there is the very really possibility of having been in the relationship
before you left. Not that this girl believes that is always the case.... this girl is not that foolish.

But this girl knows several that are or have been in online "relationships" for years and think
that calling someone Sir or Master or having a invisible collar / ko'lar from those relationships is reality.
This is most likely where this girl splits the sheets, it is not reality. It's words on a computer that come
from someone that most likely you've never seen or will see. This girl's opinion is based on those that
she knows who put more stock in the online than they ever thought of putting into real life.

Just this girl's opinion.

stormi
property of Master Bear




LadyBeckett -> RE: Online Relationships (10/14/2004 6:44:49 AM)

Well, the Kilted Sensei-tion returns! You've been missed, Sinergy. [;)]




controller4you -> RE: Online Relationships (10/16/2004 11:20:17 AM)

If you understand what being submissive really is then yes it CAN be dont in an online relationship. Being submissive means being obedient and truly desiring to serve the one you have chosen to serve. If your told to get up in the morning and kneal in the shower and say your mantra and you DO IT. Then your being obedient. But, if you are ONLY obedient in chat with this person then how is that any different than just doing what your told once a month when you see the Dom?




EStrict -> RE: Online Relationships (10/16/2004 2:51:21 PM)

Honestly, to me online is a lot like phone sex. If you *play along*, you get something out of it, if you don't, you get nothing (unless you are getting paid, then you earn money).

The thing is, the mind is a great thing. You can *think* anything enough for it to be *real* to you,,, but that isn't the same as doing it....




dally -> RE: Online Relationships (11/17/2004 1:46:31 PM)

funny thing i was just browsing through the different threads and came upon this picture you posted on your message......i chatted with THAT dom once! I SWEAR! LOL....he sent me that same exact picture...




dally -> RE: Online Relationships (11/17/2004 1:49:33 PM)

omg cyn i'm still laughing my ass off with that one!




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625