Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


pahunkboy -> Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 5:53:21 AM)

I just had a big fight with a mod of a group of mine..  over file sharing....   he claims it is "old".... and thus "fair use".

Furthermore he thinks it is no big deal.

..even after I explained how brutal IP attorneys are.   He took my name off the group over this-  which is fine with me.  I wont be a party to a "John Doe"  troll copyright lawsuit.

The same poster that is the soar spot- post the complete movie to Ben Hurr, and now this morning some song by   Justin Biebar.

People will do what they want to do- but do not do it on my IP/name.






Aylee -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 6:15:23 AM)

Paramount Home Entertainment and CBS

Although some of the music is under further copyright.




Muttling -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 6:18:15 AM)

It depends on when the copyright was established and whether or not it was renewed.

I'm pretty sure it was published with notice in the early 1970's.   Under the laws from 1964 - 1977, copyright protections are good until 95 years after the publishing date so it will be quite a while before Happy Days is in the public domain due to copyright expiration.

This said, if a number of people begin using it publicly and the owners do not enforce their copyrights it could be voided earlier for that reason.  Thus, copyright holders are generally pretty stiff about enforcing their copyrights on a "use it or loose it" type principle.





pahunkboy -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 6:22:20 AM)

As I say- if others do this-  what-ever.   But I dont want my IP- connected to the management of such a group. 




Termyn8or -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 6:29:17 AM)

If there is  group, the members could be tracked down. The software I use doesn't even require a username. You might remember the post about "them" salting the gnutella network with bogus files. It's like a land mine now. They "share" the bogus files, apparently to me, because there isn't a damn thing other than that they can do about it. There is no server, each computer on the network shares a timeslice of their processing power to make the network work. You have to have the CORRECT version of the software and never accept an upgrade.

Big money people view this as stealing. Public domain is gone. You've seen TV commercials start to use old music extensively, they saw a profit in it and somehow bought the rights to everything in public domain. Consider nothing in public domain, and fair use only covers excerpts, not the whole song/movie/show.

The only safe way to have  blog, site or something like that is to make it members only and by invitation only. It must be secure, or eventually "they" will come. That moderator is not correct when it comes to fair use. If that was so everything on my harddrive is there for fair use. Don't kid yourself, owning a website does not make one a legal expert, and even if it did, the law will be changing as the lobbyists pour in [the money].

I also now have software that can capture right from steaming audio or video. The one program that does audio only was written in 1992 ! Both programs are free. The audio one is called Cooledit, and is a bit tricky to use, but it does work. If you can use it effectively you don't even need a P2P program. Almost everything you can get on P2P is on youtube. In fact some things you can get on youtube have never been shared on P2P.

You probably did the right thing, but if TSHTF they would most likely go after the site owner. Thus the spread of P2P software. In fact I heard that if you have an older version of Napster it might just work. They have found the authors of the later software and forced them to cripple it, that's why the version is so critical.

What's more using the right software to play the files is important. Windows mediaplayer must be setup not to contact the internet. Acquire licenses ? NO. If it requires a license just delete it and find another copy. When in doubt use VLC.

Since they are such pricks I am tempted to sell my collection.

" This harddrive is $250 "
" I can get one for $55 online "
" Not this one ! "

LOL. Actually I saw an ad for a "full" harddrive on craigslist not too long ago. Ummm, I don't think it's wise to sell something like that publicly. I talked with one of my lawyers about patents, and how they are not self enforcing. He told me there are companies that get paid literally, to go shopping. They do nothing but look for patent infringements. I suspect no less is true of the RIAA and MPAA. So watch your ass out there.

T^T




pahunkboy -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 6:39:53 AM)

Hi Term,  it is a yahoo group-  the mod gave me the group to meet local gay guys.    It quickly turned into a  x pic group- 0k- fine--  tho there are many of those a dime a dozen.  

I have had now- the 4th major blow up with this guy-  he has anger/ego issues.   He said he was stepping down from another group- that I own - ....as a way to punish me I guess- because I "dont do shit".  

Yahoo groups were "in" some years ago... but I am past them.... the net evolves.

I kept my groups-  in case I want to get a political message out to many thousands. Tho these guys hate that.    We cant ruin smut.  LOL.

If copyright damages are rendered- they are not dischargable in a bankruptcy.

Not that I have to hand hold every Tom Dick and Harry-  ...but these posts were blatant and more frequent.

In a way I dont care that he got mad....  it is still better then me getting a nasty letter from some attorney.




pahunkboy -> RE: Who owns copyright to "Happy Days"? (4/17/2011 7:54:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Paramount Home Entertainment and CBS

Although some of the music is under further copyright.


Thank you Aylee.    :-)




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625