Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits Toronto AA groups - thestar.com


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits Toronto AA groups - thestar.com Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 8:59:56 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I felt attacked because you took the one quote out of context of the whole. I never ever said that atonement was wrong, but I did say that it was a Christian principle. It is a Christian principle to take moral inventory, too. I am not saying that it is wrong or not a good idea to look at where one is in their life and take stock, but the wording of that step is very much based on Christianity.

It might be a good idea if you not take a small snippet out of someone's rather larger overall point to make your own, and just make your own point in the future.

< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 6/11/2011 9:00:57 AM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 2:20:12 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
I must say that I am rather taken aback at the pages and pages of julia being chastised for saying "AA is poppycock" while she repeatedly patiently explains that was she said was that she believes "powerlessness is poppycock." As I said page 2 of this thread, I believe powerlessness is bullshit.

As for whether I'd recommend AA to someone, it would depend on the person. I'd recommend Smart Recovery or Rational Recovery to someone cognitively inclined like myself.

I left my housemate 19 days ago. A week earlier, three days off a binge she was hallucinating. It was pretty freaky, because she sounded so rational, but she was seeing and hearing things that weren't there. I explained to her and her sister that delerium tremens was potentially life threatening, but they chose to treat it at home. She's still paying the bill from the last time she was in detox. After detox, she went to a few meetings, had a little therapy and went to church, which clearly didn't work for her.

Do I think she's powerless? No, I think she is deluded, self indulgent and lacks coping skills. I think she would benefit from the discipline of 90 meetings in 90 days. She liked the AA meetings in Vero Beach County, FL, and I can only guess what she had against the meetings further south in Broward County FL.

After the hallucinations, she was sober for a week or two, but when she moved for our former house into her sister's condo, she left behind her 18 year old cat to starve to death. (Her intent had been to return to feed her until her ex returned today, but she started drinking and stopped being responsible.) Fortunately for Miss Kitty, after I was unable to reach D by phone, I surmised she was drinking again and dispatched our ex neighbor and my ex to feed Miss Kitty and keep an eye out for my housemate's ex's return.

She was very good at surrounding herself with enablers - me, her employers, her friends - all helped her escape the consequences of drinking. She's missed 10 weeks of work due to drinking in the past 19 months yet after the second to last episode, still had a job once she "gets better."

I loved my sober housemate so much and was shocked the first time she came home drunk with the police on her trail. I wish I'd let them take her away that night, and would have if her sister had briefed me ahead of time. Two days ago, I called her sister to say "I'm concerned about D" for what must surely be the last time, as I am now 1,500 miles away. Her sister always knows, but ignores it until forced to acknowledge it.

Well, I can tell from how I feel that I need to do lots of processing about this! My own alcohol consumption ceased to be a problem in 1999, now I just need to learn not to pick alcoholics.


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 6:53:50 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
I'd like to examine the relationship between addiction and the substance/behaviour of choice in a little more detail. Several people have distinguished between powerlessness over addiction and powerlessness over substance/behaviour of choice. While this distinction may work well for individuals, at a wider level it may fail to withstand scrutiny.

The thing we call addiction has many manifestations - drinking drugging gambling are the better known ones. Lately it has become recognised that other areas such as sex or eating can also be addiction-forming. Certainly the 12 Steps (and other recovery management) approaches have been applied to many areas beyond the original field of alcoholism. In this view, addiction is now believed to have behavioural manifestations as well as abusing one's substance of choice.

In this view, from a 12 Step perspective, one would have to say that behavioural addicts are powerless over their behaviour of choice. Yet this makes little sense to me. I don't believe that choice is ever absent when behavioural options are assessed. So I'm unable to accept that 'behavioural addicts' are powerless over their behaviour of choice.

Looking at this another way, the treatment for all addictions under a 12 Steps approach is identical - follow the Steps. So the treatment for behavioural and substance addictions is identical. It follows that the underlying conditions are identical, just the symptoms (substance/behaviour of choice) vary. If this is valid, then it follows that the powerlessness is over the 'disease' of addiction, not the symptom or substance/behaviour of choice.

This might seem a little removed from the day-to-day struggles of those in recovery. The last thing I want to do is devalue any of that. If it works for an individual then it's great by me for that individual. But there is a very serious issue involved here.

Ultimately what is at stake here is the very concept of addiction as a disease.



< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/11/2011 6:56:30 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 7:36:01 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I felt attacked because you took the one quote out of context of the whole. I never ever said that atonement was wrong, but I did say that it was a Christian principle. It is a Christian principle to take moral inventory, too. I am not saying that it is wrong or not a good idea to look at where one is in their life and take stock, but the wording of that step is very much based on Christianity.

It might be a good idea if you not take a small snippet out of someone's rather larger overall point to make your own, and just make your own point in the future.


I took one quote and responded to one quote because my personal experience as seen from inside the rooms offered a different explaination that yours did.
I am not discounting yours.
I just have no experience with that particular idea within Christianity; it was not a part of church where I grew up and I went to weekly services and sunday school when I was younger.

This makes you no less wrong than it makes me "right".
Our experiences are simply different and our perceptions and opinions are likewise so.

Again, no offence toward you was intended.

Edit: missing N

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 7:50:04 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Ultimately what is at stake here is the very concept of addiction


Yeah. Well, see, denying there's any addiction isn't very useful in seeking a solution.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 8:48:01 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I just have no experience with that particular idea within Christianity; it was not a part of church where I grew up and I went to weekly services and sunday school when I was younger.


It was very much part of every denomination of Christianity I ever encountered, with the exception of Unity Church

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 9:09:50 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
no. religion doesn't belong anywhere because its bullshit. there is no higher power of any description. if you believe in one you are delusional.

hannah lynn

_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 9:13:31 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

I just have no experience with that particular idea within Christianity; it was not a part of church where I grew up and I went to weekly services and sunday school when I was younger.


It was very much part of every denomination of Christianity I ever encountered, with the exception of Unity Church


Baptism as a baby through confirmation, all through the high school years, I grew up in a Congregational church that was primarily UCC affiliated, with the added affliations of Baptist and UU added as it is an ecumenical church.

Again, Julia, I was just pointing out that my experience was different than yours, not that mine was right or yours was "wrong".
I am sorry you percieved it that way.

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 9:21:30 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Again, Julia, I was just pointing out that my experience was different than yours, not that mine was right or yours was "wrong".
I am sorry you percieved it that way.


No biggie, perhaps I feel slightly defensive because I feel as though I have offended people which was never my intention...

I am not the type of person that goes around crapping on other people's belief systems.... and I feel like I did that unwittingly on this thread, which to me is about treating a disease.

Lastly, I am a little sensitive about this issue because I was raised in an area with a high ratio of born again evangelicals (not my parents) and I studied with them, and I hear echoes of it in the 12 steps, and on a personal level I did everything I could to reprogram my own mind away from that mode of thinking about the world, especially any sort of philosophy of powerlessness. I think when I used when I was younger I felt powerless, and at other times when I have been anxious/depressed, I have felt powerless... but since I reprogrammed my mind to believe I have infinite power over my life, how I think, etc, I haven't been depressed since. It has nothing to do with "god" and everything to do with me.... in fact I suppose in my spiritual outlook, any god would want me to feel powerful inside of myself, to meet challenges, and to cope with adversity...

Like I said, it is my personal world view, and I know many others do not share it, and it isn't helpful to them... AA is, and I think if that is so it speaks to people's cultural expectations via their own upbringing and cultural experiences.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 9:51:19 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

no. religion doesn't belong anywhere because its bullshit. there is no higher power of any description. if you believe in one you are delusional.

hannah lynn


Bless your heart.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/11/2011 11:36:23 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
If you felt attacked by Me, julia, I'll be more than happy to apologize.  That wasn't My intent. 

I probably should apologize for confusing the issue here, too.  This thread was about AA, not NA.  If I was the first one to include a program that *is* different, in some cases where it seems to boil down to the difference between a word (addiction rather than alcohol) I'll apologize for that, too.  From what I know, that's part of why NA became it's own program to begin with.  That "alcohol" didn't encompass all additions and a new organization was formed.  Still based on the same premise, but not *just* focused on alcohol.

I've had problems all along with this five percent thing.  My reason for this is, if it really is an anonymous program that is all over the world, a sample of less than two thousand just doesn't cut it for Me.  There's no good way to debate it.  How do you compare such a random sampling to, what I honestly believe encompasses millions over a century?  Are we only considering five years to be a success rate?  What about folks who relapse at two years and then stay sober for twenty?  Are we counting the folks who get exposure to a program in jail who really aren't ready to get their act together until five years down the road?  There are just too many variables for Me.  Pretty much the same as when we try to talk of any group that we don't really know the whole story about when we try to track numbers.

I've heard a lot about the concept of powerlessness on this thread.  I know how it's been explained to Me on occasion.  Have you ever dealt with someone who is blind, stinking drunk/high?  How much power do they really have over themselves when they are puking their guts up because they have ingested so much alcohol that their own body is rejecting the substance due to alcohol poisoning?  Ever try to reason with them?  It doesn't work.  Once they are on a roll, there is no stopping, saying they've had enough, or any other thing.  Chemistry tells us that they don't have control over their body or their mind. 

Years ago, when I volunteered with DV, we had a gal who was a member of NA.  She had to get a special exception from the rules of the safe house because she was a treasurer of a late night meeting that happened twice a week and she also attended regional meetings once a month.  It was a long drive and we talked about a lot of things.  I heard all about program Nazis, thirteenth steppers, and a bunch of other things that are too much for this thread.  It was eye opening to say the least.

For that five percent (if that's really what it is) it's working for them.  That's enough for Me.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 12:46:47 AM   
LinnaeaBorealis


Posts: 8595
Joined: 10/5/2008
From: Insanity & beyond
Status: offline
I also don't remember being told that I would continue to be powerless, just that I was powerless over the alcohol & because of that powerlessness my life had become unmanageable. That's all true!! But by staying sober & taking what I wanted & leaving the rest, I became a powerful woman. I have overcome much in my life since getting sober & I've done it all without the aid of alcohol. They taught me that there is no problem so great that a drink won't make it worse. And they taught me to have power over that as well as other aspects of my life.

And the statistics: I have no idea where those statistics have been derived from, it's just the statistic that I have heard over the years of my sobriety. And it's no more & no less among AA members than among people who found sobriety in other ways.

Nobody can really explain why I stayed sober all these years & my cousin & my uncle have not been able to. I don't know how or why & I don't question it. I'm not going to over-intellectualize this thing because for all I know, it's just fucking magic!!

Quite frankly, I think this has been a pretty good debate & exchange of ideas.

< Message edited by LinnaeaBorealis -- 6/12/2011 1:17:57 AM >


_____________________________

Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack in everything
That's how the light gets in
~~L. Cohen

Just one of the yahoo's

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 1:15:04 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
----> Tweaky: (I wish CM's software didn't translate the "at" symbol as 4 asterisks) I differentiate addiction and compulsive behavior. I think the word "addiction" has been misused for years to mean things which have nothing to do with physical dependency combined with psychological dependency. One can be physically dependent on nasal spray to keep the sinuses open, but not need them psychologically. Conversely, one can have the compulsion to gamble without having any physical withdrawal symptoms upon abrupt cessation.

That's why professionals in the Pain Management field differentiate between physical dependency, addiction, and pseudo-addiction.

Saying one is "addicted" to ice cream, or fucking, or nose-picking, is a gross misuse of the word, IMO.

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 1:22:23 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Ultimately what is at stake here is the very concept of addiction


Yeah. Well, see, denying there's any addiction isn't very useful in seeking a solution.

You may or may not be correct in that assertion. But, as no one has yet "den[ied] there's any addiction", it seems pretty irrelevant at this point.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/12/2011 1:44:25 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 4:14:24 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

----> Tweaky: (I wish CM's software didn't translate the "at" symbol as 4 asterisks) I differentiate addiction and compulsive behavior. I think the word "addiction" has been misused for years to mean things which have nothing to do with physical dependency combined with psychological dependency. One can be physically dependent on nasal spray to keep the sinuses open, but not need them psychologically. Conversely, one can have the compulsion to gamble without having any physical withdrawal symptoms upon abrupt cessation.

That's why professionals in the Pain Management field differentiate between physical dependency, addiction, and pseudo-addiction.

Saying one is "addicted" to ice cream, or fucking, or nose-picking, is a gross misuse of the word, IMO.


Yes. Pertinent points. The difference between say, a full blown heroin habit and addiction to shopping is more than the difference between a healthy obsession and an unhealthy one. Or even a legal one and an illegal one. Or one caused by prohibition/social stigma and one caused by consumerism/social approval and status. So, the question of where does one draw the boundaries around addiction becomes a contentious with one with lots of diverse views.

In addition to the points outlined in your post, I feel there are at least two more points that require serious consideration. The first is that of social function/dysfunction. For instance, nicotine addiction is a serious often lethal addiction that is legal, and one that currently doesn't impair social functioning greatly (while health lasts). Most drug addictions don't necessarily impair social function, and class here plays an important role in maintaining social function. Nicotine addiction is demonstrably more lethal and more destructive than illegal addictions yet is rarely viewed with the same urgency.

The second is whether it's more productive to view addiction as a learned behaviour, as a disease or from another viewpoint. This is probably the issue at the very heart of this thread. The position adopted on this point influences whether addiction remains a lifelong threat or a bad period in one's life that one can, with the right guidance and sufficient commitment, put behind oneself. It also has a large influence on the position adopted in relation to drug law relaxation and prohibition.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/12/2011 4:17:16 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 5:41:49 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

I've heard a lot about the concept of powerlessness on this thread.  I know how it's been explained to Me on occasion.  Have you ever dealt with someone who is blind, stinking drunk/high?  How much power do they really have over themselves


My ex D, every freaking Sunday. He thinks he's not an alcoholic because he doesn't drink during the week . He disregards my position that if one drinks to the point of blacking out every week, one has a problem.

Thanks for the interesting reframe, LadyPact. I've been referring to the power the sober person has. I agree that once someone starts drinking, it can be like an avalanche. Or as Stephen King eloquently put it in "Tommyknockers" - being in the tornado.

But when I think of the "we" in this statement:

quote:

We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.


I am referring to a sober person faced with the choice of drinking or not drinking. For me, the Addictive Voice/Beast concept of Rational Recovery was more useful that AA's 12 Steps:

http://rational.org/index.php?id=59

We call your desire for the pleasure of alcohol and other drugs the Beast®. The Beast of Booze, or the Beast of Buzz, is ruthless in getting what it wants because it is about survival. It cannot speak, it cannot see, it has no arms or legs, and it has no intelligence of its own.

The Beast is utterly powerless to act on its own. Instead, it uses your thoughts and intelligence, sees through your eyes, creates strong feelings, and persuades you to use your hands, arms, and legs in order to obtain its favorite substance. It must appeal to you to get alcohol or drugs into your bloodstream.

Although your beast brain has no language ability, it uses your language and thinking centers to get what it wants. It is an animal mentality that can talk in your head. For example, if you wisely decide that drinking is bad for you, and that you will stop, you will soon hear that old, familiar voice telling you why you should continue drinking. You may even imagine a picture of what you want to drink. That is your Addictive Voice, the sole cause of addiction, expressing the Beast's demand for alcohol/drugs. Addictive Voice is to Beast as bark is to dog.

There are two parties to your addiction - you and your Beast, “I” and “it.“ You can easily recognize your Addictive Voice using the following definition:

Any thinking, imagery, or feeling that supports or suggests the possible future use of alcohol or drugs -- ever.

AVRT (Addictive Voice Recognition Technique) allows you to become acutely aware of Beast activity and dissociate from it so it can no longer instigate action. Then you may confidently decide you’ll never drink again, and feel the grand relief of knowing your addiction is finally over.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 7:02:55 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I also don't remember being told that I would continue to be powerless, just that I was powerless over the alcohol & because of that powerlessness my life had become unmanageable. That's all true!


Many groups also read this at every meeting:

If we are painstaking about this phase of our development,
1. We will be amazed before we are half way through.
2. We are going to know a new freedom and a new happiness.
3. We will not regret the past nor wish to shut the door on it.
4. We will comprehend the word serenity and we will know peace.
5. No matter how far down the scale we have gone, we will see how our experience can benefit others.
6. That feeling of uselessness and self-pity will disappear.
7. We will lose interest in selfish things and gain interest in our fellows.
8. Self-seeking will slip away.
9. Our whole attitude and outlook upon life will change.
10. Fear of people and of economic insecurity will leave us.
11. We will intuitively know how to handle situations which used to baffle us.
12. We will suddenly realize that God is doing for us what we could not do for ourselves (in the sense of spiritual awakening).

Are these extravagant promises? We think not. They are being fulfilled among us, sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. They will always materialize if we work for them.


Not exactly a disempowering affirmation.

(in reply to LinnaeaBorealis)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 7:51:17 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

----> Tweaky: (I wish CM's software didn't translate the "at" symbol as 4 asterisks) I differentiate addiction and compulsive behavior. I think the word "addiction" has been misused for years to mean things which have nothing to do with physical dependency combined with psychological dependency. One can be physically dependent on nasal spray to keep the sinuses open, but not need them psychologically. Conversely, one can have the compulsion to gamble without having any physical withdrawal symptoms upon abrupt cessation.

That's why professionals in the Pain Management field differentiate between physical dependency, addiction, and pseudo-addiction.

Saying one is "addicted" to ice cream, or fucking, or nose-picking, is a gross misuse of the word, IMO.



Those who specialize in the field of addictions will say it is what the action does to the brain chemistry that is addictive. In other words, gambling or sex or shopping will trigger certain neurochemicals within the person engaging in that behavior and they will experience a "high". In order to stimulate that same chemical reaction, they will engage in the behavior compulsively, to experience that high as much and as often as possible. They will trade everything for it, and that is what the addiction is....

Now, perhaps the term addiction does not sit well with you, but having a sibling that has a food addiction, for a time a gambling addiction, and now has a shopping addiction... I would say his behavior is typical of other addictions I have seen, and just as destructive... including isolating him from loved ones.

Just my experience.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 7:53:17 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

If you felt attacked by Me, julia, I'll be more than happy to apologize.  That wasn't My intent. 


Not at all LP, I just felt a little like I may have offended certain people who have responded to this thread, which was not my intention

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits T... - 6/12/2011 9:21:11 AM   
eihwaz


Posts: 367
Joined: 10/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Again as I understand it, after going through the 12 Steps, one ends up with a realisation that one has a choice over one's substance of choice...

To me one of the core points of this discussion is whether the choice available post-12 Steps is also available at Step 1 or not. If it is - then the disease model is, it seems to me, somewhat compromised. If it isn't, then where does the choice post 12-Steps come from?

According to Twelve Step philosophy, the alcoholic does not have such a choice at Step One:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alcoholics Anonymous, Fourth Edition, page 24
The fact is that most alcoholics, for reasons yet obscure, have lost the power of choice in drink.  Our so-called will power becomes practically nonexistent.  We are unable, at certain times, to bring into our consciousness with sufficient force the memory of the suffering and humiliation of even a week or a month ago.  We are without defense against the first drink.


In Twelve Step recovery, one acquires choice via a "spiritual transformation" or "spiritual awakening" as a result of practicing the Steps.  AA adopted the idea of a "spiritual transformation" as a cure for alcoholism from Carl Jung:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alcoholics Anonymous, Fourth Edition, pages 26-27
[Dr. Jung said to his alcoholic patient]: "You have the mind of a chronic alcoholic.  I have never seen one single case recover where that state of mind existed to the extent that it does in you."  Our friend felt as though the gates of hell had closed on him with a clang.

He said to the doctor, "Is there no exception?"

"Yes," replied the doctor, "there is.  Exceptions to cases such as yours have been occurring since early times.  Here and there, one in a while, alcoholics have had what are called vital spiritual experiences.  To me, these occurrences are phenomena.  They appear to be in the nature of huge emotional deplacements and rearrangements.  Ideas, emotions, and attitudes where were once the guiding forces of the lives of these men are suddenly cast to one side, and a completely new set of conceptions and motives begins to dominate them.  In fact, I have been trying to produce some such emotional rearrangement within you..."


Correspondence between Bill W. and Jung at Sacred Connections: The History of Alcoholics Anonymous, C.G. Jung/Bill W. Letters -- Spiritus contra Spiritum

The nature of the AA "spiritual experience" was also informed, directly and indirectly, by the ideas of William James.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alcholics Anonymous, Fourth Edition, Appendix II
[M]any alcoholics have ... concluded that in order to recover they must acquire an immediate and overwhelming "God-consciousness" followed at once by a vast change in feeling and outlook.

[Sudden] transformations, though frequent, are by no means the rule.  Most of our experiences are what the psychologist William James calls the "educational variety" because they develop slowly over a period of time.


As far as what AA considers a "spiritual transformation" to be:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, "Step Twelve," pages 106-107
Maybe there are as many definitions of spiritual awakening as there are people who have had them.  But certainly each genuine one has something in common with all the others.  And these things which they have in common are not too hard to understand.  When a man or a woman has a spiritual awakening, the most important meaning of it is that he has now become able to do, feel, and believe that which he could not do before on his unaided strength and resources alone.  He has been granted a gift which amounts to a new state of consciousness and being.  He has been set on a path which tells him he is really going somewhere, that life is not a dead end, not something to be endured or mastered.  In a very real sense he has been transformed because he has laid hold of a source of strength which, in one way or another, he had hitherto denied himself.  He finds himself in possession of a degree of honest, tolerance, unselfishness, peace of mind, and love of which he had thought himself quite incapable.  What he has received is a free gift, and yet usually, at least in some small part, he has made himself ready to receive it.

AA's manner of making ready to receive this gifts lies in the practice of the Twelve Steps in our program.


For AA sources, see Cyber Recovery Forums: AA Big Book and 12 Step Sources

quote:

ORIGINAL tweakabelle
I suppose it could be said that it's a little unfair to hold AA responsible for the activities of adherents such as Watters. My feeling is that if AA accepted its low success rate, it could no longer maintain its insistence on being the only way, and people like Watters would have to move aside...

I'm not aware that AA insists on being the only way.  As I suggested in an earlier post, the implicit endorsement of AA as such by government, in addition to raising church-state issues, is problematic for AA as well.  For example, AA states that the only requirement for membership is a desire to stop drinking;  conversely, it's not the desire to avoid prison time.

ETA: AA's description of "spiritual awakening"

< Message edited by eihwaz -- 6/12/2011 9:54:45 AM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Does religion belong at AA? Fight over God splits Toronto AA groups - thestar.com Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125