quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

What bullshit in this thread. Every idiot leftie here was drooling in anticipation of something to nail her with. DK must be so disappointed there isnt a fucking thing to take her down on with on "troopergate".

LMAO I dont even think DK has posted to this clusterfuck

SOCK PUPPET ALERT< LMAOOOOOOOOO I knew one was gonna turn up
where has ANYONE here in this thread " drooled" over anticipation of the emails, dont be a liar
Put up or shut up,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.

quote:

Miss Coulters premise isnt that leftists are demonic. In her book she shows how mobs act demonic, and how leftists act like mobs (as in these continual frenzied attacks against Sarah Palin).

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.

You are too insignificant to hurt anyones feelings, dear.

Correct definition. Note the words for purposes of deception. Never happened.

and a more complete definition is that the nature of the deception is to show support/agreement for another post. Never happened.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

awwwwwwwwww someone hurt your widdle feelings ???
i used sockpuppets term....
I said THIS thread for a reason
you go thru the 30 million threads and check..lazy git
Id like some proof please
Im english, I use the english definition A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community.

You are too insignificant to hurt anyones feelings, dear.

Correct definition. Note the words for purposes of deception. Never happened.

and a more complete definition is that the nature of the deception is to show support/agreement for another post. Never happened.

Apparently Im not, otherwise you wouldnt be so petulant and snarky
Using two identities, one for crossing TOS violations is not deception?
really?

why are your sockpuppets threads always nastier than your threads????
not deceptive?
in your case you are too easy to catch out

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

Every idiot leftie

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Since no one else is posting anything on topic...


From Newsbusters:

quote:


NBC Most Excited by Palin’s E-Mail, Yet Fails to Dig Up Any ‘Bombshells’


Much of the media made fools of themselves with their excited obsession over the release of Sarah Palin’s gubernatorial e-mails, but NBC News went the furthest, sending, as did CNN, reporters to Juneau as the network uniquely led its Friday night newscast by hyping the non-news as a major event. “On the broadcast tonight,” anchor Lester Holt heralded, “mail call. Thousands of pages of e-mail from Sarah Palin's time as Governor. What we're learning about her tonight.”


Following a story from “national investigative correspondent” Michael Isikoff in which “MSNBC.com investigative reporter” Bill Dedman had the gall to complain “we waited longer for these records than Sarah Palin was Governor, almost a thousand days,” NBC’s David Gregory recognized, in an understatement: “As Mike and his team are finding, not a lot of bombshells here.”

ABC also got into the act, but didn’t send any on-air personnel to Juneau. On Saturday’s World News, however, John Berman trumpeted his big discovery proving Palin’s hypocrisy: “While these days Palin is criticizing parts of Michelle Obama’s national battle against obesity...she once e-mailed an aide asking for ‘low carb foods...just don’t want the kids to have too much sugar/white carb stuff.’” That should pretty much discredit her.




CBS showed the best news judgment, not mentioning the Palin e-mails on Friday or Saturday’s CBS Evening News.


Isikoff’s find – Palin once praised something candidate Barack Obama said: “Among the e-mails, this exchange from Palin to an aide written a few weeks before she was picked by McCain, praising then-candidate Obama’s energy policy speech. ‘He gave a great speech this morning in Michigan – mentioned Alaska,’ adding, ‘we need to take advantage of this and write a statement saying he's right on.’ Then in a later e-mail telling an aide, ‘he did say ‘yay’ to our gas line. Pretty cool. Wrong candidate.’ Palin later became one of Obama's fiercest critics on energy policy.”


Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2011/06/13/nbc-most-excited-palin-s-e-mail-yet-fails-dig-any-bombshells#ixzz1PBGtIQTZ

This point was made by me on page three

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yet another ad hominum

Who is ron

And I support my assertions well enough

Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums

Because they have no real on topic arguments

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Yet another ad hominum

Who is ron

And I support my assertions well enough

Fun fact is that for the most part, the only assertions that leftists have to support are these constant ad hominums

Because they have no real on topic arguments

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Stop while you are ahead, because Ron posted a few threads in which you could not support your assertions, I am sure there are many many many more such posts... In fact many times when you bash people for being leftists it it because you have no evidence of what you say.

You didn't support your assertion that "leftists can't participate in logical, rational discussions" at all!