Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/5/2011 9:02:23 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

HillWilliam,

I'm not arguing that there isn't any sea level rise.  I'm arguing against sternskippers belief that a "couple of feet of sea level rise" in the particular instance he cited has much to do with the current global warming/climate change, AGW etc, arguments.

In other words, his example was more about the lowering of the ground level, than it was the rising of the sea levels.

Firm


No.

You`re arguing that you don`t give a fuck.

That`s an important point.

BTW,I have the conduct and tone troll blocked.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/5/2011 9:10:19 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

HillWilliam,

I'm not arguing that there isn't any sea level rise.  I'm arguing against sternskippers belief that a "couple of feet of sea level rise" in the particular instance he cited has much to do with the current global warming/climate change, AGW etc, arguments.

In other words, his example was more about the lowering of the ground level, than it was the rising of the sea levels.

Firm


No.

You`re arguing that you don`t give a fuck.

That`s an important point.

BTW,I have the conduct and tone troll blocked.

I gotta quit let'n ya read my mind, Owner.  I'm not even sure why I post, since you already know everything that I'm going to say, and whither the dark parts of my soul they originated.

Or maybe your just wrong, and I mean what I mean?

Naahhh, can't be that.  You're too darn smart for me!

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/5/2011 9:23:53 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ahh, geez, stern ... you posted in an AGW thread, claim massive sea level rise in support, and when you get called on the facts write more shit in a single post than I could write in a week .... or even even interested in reading.

Give it up man, and just admit you screwed the pooch, and it's over.


I knew you never had a card in your deck. Thanks for proving it.
Not one fact  or even a defense of your faulty claims.
THAT is what this thread reflects.



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 2:27:42 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Yup, and you too. What do I mean ? ASK.

T^T

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 6:21:18 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Yup, and you too. What do I mean ? ASK.


Yawn... It's not ScinceFriday yet termy



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 6:47:39 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

Not one fact  or even a defense of your faulty claims.

What "faulty claim" would that be, Stern? 

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 7:21:11 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

What "faulty claim" would that be, Stern?
Firm


Your grandiose sinking land google... you know the one that NOAA discounted as a very small contributory factor to sea levels.
Dude you had your chance and decided to speak superfluously about all this flizzem flazzem that goes into your judging people's posts and making the inane suggestion that this thread had something to do with the liberal/con thing.
   I gave you your chance. I merely came back because often termy has something sort of funny to say at the end of a thread.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 8:04:20 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline


Unless scientists use term like "will" instead of could,folks of Firm`s ilk are going to play word games.

But if I asked Firm or Pop to run down range and put up new targets for my rifle practice saying I "might" shoot them,but don`t worry,do you think a words like "might or could" would have a slightly different meaning?

Damm straight they will.

If I said shooting out their guts with both loads of 00 shootgun pellets,...."could"...... die from it.Does anyone think they would play word games, then?

Damm straight they would NOT.

Unless the willfully ignorant sees the cross-hairs on them personally,they aren`t going to be serious.I`ve pointed this out a few times.

I imagine Firm or Pops or anyone playing dumb, would listen to the weatherman when he says wave highs "might" reach 6 to 8 feet, declaring a small craft advisory.

Terms like could,might,possibly, "should" be enough to warn off anyone from going boating.

Not for dummies,though.




< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/6/2011 8:06:47 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 10:51:54 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The difference now is that we are adding millions of tons of carbon to the atmosphere unaturally... It comes from vaporizing fossil fuels.

Unh... just for your information:

Sulfate aerosols, which result from burning coal, biomass, and volcanic eruptions, tend to cool the Earth. ~NASA: Global Climate Change

More CO2 hijinks:
    The data from shallow ice cores, such as those from Siple, Antarctica, are widely used as a proof of man-made increase of CO2 content in the global atmosphere, notably by IPCC... The problem with Siple data (and with other shallow cores) is that the CO2 concentration found in pre-industrial ice from a depth of 68 meters (i.e. above the depth of clathrate formation) was "too high"... the CO2 concentration was 328 ppmv, not about 290 ppmv, as needed by man-made warming hypothesis...

    An ad hoc assumption, not supported by any factual evidence, solved the problem: the average age of air was arbitrary decreed to be exactly 83 years younger than the ice in which it was trapped. The "corrected" ice data were then smoothly aligned with the Mauna Loa record, and reproduced in countless publications as a famous "Siple curve". Only thirteen years later, in 1993, glaciologists attempted to prove experimentally the "age assumption", but they failed.

    The basis of most of the IPCC conclusions on anthropogenic causes and on projections of climatic change is the assumption of low level of CO2 in the pre-industrial atmosphere. This assumption, based on glaciological studies, is false.
From the Predicting the Predictable Department: Sourcewatch doesn't like the author of the above.

K.


To the paper of JAWOROWSKI: For years he emphasizes only the difficulties of these studies, formulates the underlying assumptions which sometimcs are only partly fulfilled and criticizes the work performed hitherto in an unscrupulous manner. He does this without any appreciation for the development of expertise in this field over several decades. Thus he extrapolates from contamination problems in improvised pioneering experiments in the late sixties to more recent (1992) similar experiments on the Greenland ice cap for which special equipment was developed.

Some of his statements are drastically wrong from the physical point of view, e.g. the statement that CO2 at 70 m depth in the ice begins to change into solid clathrates. Another example concerns the gas-occlusion process in firn and young ice. This process has been studied in detail theoretically and experimentally. The theory of diffusion of gases in firn and the occlusion at the firn-ice transition has been confirmed impressively by the detection of a gravitational enrichment of the heavier gases and of the heavier isotopes of a gas. This enrichment depends, in the first instance, on the depth of the firn-ice transition. It enables the reconstruction of the history of gas enclosure depth during the last glacial-interglacial cycle. But JAWOROWSKI maintains that the age of the ice and that of the occluded gases are the same and shifts the CO2 increase revealed from studies of the SIPLE core which in the uppermost part overlaps convincingly with the atmospheric measurements by ca. 100 years back in time (assuming identical ages for the ice and the gases in the ice). Why should there be such a drastic increase of CO2 and of CH4 in the middle of the 19th century?


The vaporization of any solid, results in CO2 entering the atmosphere as of carbon is the base of matter. The question is how much and from what source ? The answer is that a much more CO2 is being introduced into the atmosphere as a result of continued industry's and consumer energy needs and the burning of same.

EIA: The combustion of coal, however, adds a significant amount of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere per unit of heat energy, more than does the combustion of other fossil fuels.


< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/6/2011 11:03:47 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 11:10:06 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

What "faulty claim" would that be, Stern?
Firm


Your grandiose sinking land google... you know the one that NOAA discounted as a very small contributory factor to sea levels.
Dude you had your chance and decided to speak superfluously about all this flizzem flazzem that goes into your judging people's posts and making the inane suggestion that this thread had something to do with the liberal/con thing.
  I gave you your chance. I merely came back because often termy has something sort of funny to say at the end of a thread.


My "grandiose sinking land google" ...

Gee, interesting.

So, let me get this right ... in your world, when you make a claim that is proven misleading at best, and a lie at worst, and someone calls you out on it .... they are the ones that are practicing "flizzem flazzem" et al?

Geez, Stern, all you had to do was say ... "hey, you're right, perhaps I failed to mention that part ... but other evidence still says the oceans are rising ..." and then we might have had an interesting conversation.

But, instead, you continue to bullshit, deflect, and accuse in an attempt to transfer the onus of being mistaken onto anyone else. 

I call horseshit.  All this does is make you look petty, small-minded, weak and not adult enough to hold a discussion.

I'm done with you on this subject.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 11:14:18 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Unless scientists use term like "will" instead of could,folks of Firm`s ilk are going to play word games.

But if I asked Firm or Pop to run down range and put up new targets for my rifle practice saying I "might" shoot them,but don`t worry,do you think a words like "might or could" would have a slightly different meaning?

Damm straight they will.

If I said shooting out their guts with both loads of 00 shootgun pellets,...."could"...... die from it.Does anyone think they would play word games, then?

Damm straight they would NOT.

Unless the willfully ignorant sees the cross-hairs on them personally,they aren`t going to be serious.I`ve pointed this out a few times.

I imagine Firm or Pops or anyone playing dumb, would listen to the weatherman when he says wave highs "might" reach 6 to 8 feet, declaring a small craft advisory.

Terms like could,might,possibly, "should" be enough to warn off anyone from going boating.

Not for dummies,though.

In scientific lingo, everything is a probability.  But that probability is generally given a weight, average, or percentage, and the reasons and methodology are given and explained.

Therefore anyone can review the material, and make a rational decision of the weight of the probability.

In general conversation, that isn't the case.

So, when a general media article summarizes a "scientific report", they do not include any of the methodology, math and caveats, therefore there is no realistic way to give any creditable weight to such a general media report.

Go fish, Owner.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 11:23:39 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
If a doctor told Firm or Pops that transfusing blood from say, that homeless guy in the ally next door,"might" cause him or a family member to "possibly" get the same diseases the homeless guy has,Firm or Pops would point a finger and chastise the Dr. for <hick accent>,use`n dem damm weasel words a`gin,like "might/could" ,try`n to fool us...."

"Well doctor saw-bones,we`ll take the damm transfusion and t`hell with ya`ll! You and your elitists school`n and high-falutin education don`t impress me none".





Should we wait for the slowest and most willfully ignorant and incurious to be swayed, before we act?


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/6/2011 11:25:32 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 12:10:41 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


I didn't quote any of your post because, why bother? A list of some of the arguments I've seen people make - without a shred of support - would curl the hair on a brass pig. Maybe you're right, but if you want to be taken seriously do the work.

K.






< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/6/2011 12:13:11 PM >

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 12:57:38 PM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

.............................


I just wanted to congratulate you; I've never before considered a man "shrill".  "Rabid", yes... and that could certainly apply in this case, too, but "shrill" is a first.  

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 1:00:16 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

If a doctor told Firm or Pops that transfusing blood from say, that homeless guy in the ally next door,"might" cause him or a family member to "possibly" get the same diseases the homeless guy has,Firm or Pops would point a finger and chastise the Dr. for <hick accent>,use`n dem damm weasel words a`gin,like "might/could" ,try`n to fool us...."

"Well doctor saw-bones,we`ll take the damm transfusion and t`hell with ya`ll! You and your elitists school`n and high-falutin education don`t impress me none".

Should we wait for the slowest and most willfully ignorant and incurious to be swayed, before we act?

You are confusing many things, Owner, and I don't have the patience to educate you in detail.  And it would likely be impossible at your age, and with your ideological stance, anyway (read: closed minded).

However, you are now delving into "risks", and not an argument about the sea's rising or the dangers of transfusion.

Let me ask you a question: can you put a price on a life?  If so, what is it?  If not, why not?

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 1:08:12 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Let me ask you a question: can you put a price on a life? If so, what is it?


Of course. Insurance companies do it all the time.

http://stats.org/stories/2011/value_statistical_life_jun27_11.html

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 1:21:03 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Let me ask you a question: can you put a price on a life?

Yes, but it will vary depending on the costs involved in the method you use to kill them.

K.






< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/6/2011 1:28:06 PM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 1:23:47 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

So, let me get this right ... in your world, when you make a claim that is proven misleading at best, and a lie at worst, and someone calls you out on it .... they are the ones that are practicing "flizzem flazzem" et al?


Please quote me correctly and stop lying... I told YOU your throwing a basically insignificant factor as significant and then patently refusing to demonstrate there was any was flizzem flazzem ... YOUR flizzem flazzem.
   I submit to you that it's misleading when you start talking about right and left political ideologies and trying to derail the conversation instead of SIMPLY ANSWERING a question.

quote:

Geez, Stern, all you had to do was say ... "hey, you're right, perhaps I failed to mention that part ... but other evidence still says the oceans are rising ..." and then we might have had an interesting conversation.


You what? I'm going to be charitable and pet you on this one cause i want to wrap this shit up ... So here ya go..

quote:

As far as the "rising ocean" level along where you live (Massachusetts?), does the concept of "post-glacial rebound" (sometimes now called "glacial isostatic adjustment" to take into account places where the rebound is negative) mean anything to you?  Perhaps, the problem is more about how the earth is sinking, than it is about how the sea is rising, for your friends along the coast?


You know, you point out a statistically insignificant, but still present feature to rising sea levels. However, the scientists here in Gloucester at the several NOAA facilities have said in past meetings here with the fishing community, that's basically not an important factor given the difference in terms of overall contribution it adds is in the vicinity of 6 centimeters in 100 years, as opposed to .3 meters in the last 20.
Does that work better for you?
It'll have to, it's all you are going to get.


< Message edited by SternSkipper -- 7/6/2011 1:24:35 PM >


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 3:01:32 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

You know, you point out a statistically insignificant, but still present feature to rising sea levels. However, the scientists here in Gloucester at the several NOAA facilities have said in past meetings here with the fishing community, that's basically not an important factor given the difference in terms of overall contribution it adds is in the vicinity of 6 centimeters in 100 years, as opposed to .3 meters in the last 20.
Does that work better for you?
It'll have to, it's all you are going to get.

So, you are claiming that global warming has caused a sea level rise along the Massachusetts coast of .3 meters in the last 20 years? That's 0.98 feet.  About a foot? (11.8 inches)

Well, why then, my friend, did you claim it has risen 2 feet in post 42?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

You know those friends you told me about? If it rises much more than the 2 feet it's risen since I got here, your friends will have waterfront property and you can roll up your fucking pants legs and dig clams on Route 95 when you come to visit.

So, which is it? Two feet or 0.98 of a foot?

Or do you wish to admit that you engaged in a bit of hyperbole for dramatic effect?

And then tried to go all postal on me for pointing it out?

Really done this time. 

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought - 7/6/2011 3:30:10 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Could you hold that target a little higher and to the right,Firm?





It`s "possible",that I "might" miss it.<locks and loads>


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Warming ocean could melt ice faster than thought Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109