Moonhead
Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: imperatrixx It's actually true, especially in recent years. This shows a nifty little chart of debt as percentage of GDP since 1945: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms Under all but one Democrat (Obama), percentage went down. It went up in all but 2 of the Republicans listed - Eisenhower and Nixon's first term. Seriously it's like a roller coaster. Red goes up, blue goes down, red goes up, blue goes down. ETA - I actually think it's interesting that people are riding on Obama for national debt. His percentage change (9%) is less than both of Reagan's terms (11.3 and 9.3%), Bush I (13%) and Bush II's second term (20.7%, more than twice Obama's) - compared to recent GOP Presidents, Obama's change in the debt is below average. Why dont you look at it based on where the majority in Congress lies...you know..the ones that actually set the budget? Oh, because it doesnt suit your agenda. More Republicans. I mean, you did spend the whole of last year braying about how the GOP was going to take back the country in November, didn't you?
_____________________________
I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted... (Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)
|