NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kat321 quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou LOL. What exactly is so crazy, there are a couple school districts experimenting with this. The beginning of the concept is http://www.khanacademy.org/. Bill Gates seems to like it. Of course it's not developed fully, but the future is coming, it's a superior method. Anyway, go educate yourself. You can start at www.khanacademy.org The Kahn Academy is a wonderful idea.... as a tutoring agent for students not keeping up in class or for adults who need to gain certain skills for job retention or promotion. Gates has not advocated the program replace all schooling, nor has any district supplanted their curriculum for complete online coursework- his or anyone's. The districts that do have online programs largely allow them for students who do not succeed in traditional classrooms or as charters, and the programs are overseen by teachers who the students communicate with regularly. In fact, the 'best' online programs (those in which students had the highest achievement levels) were courses in which immediate feedback was provided by instructors attached to the programs. Videos alone don't work as an online teaching method, and produce the poorest results of all online teaching programs. By the way, current research in online K-12 learning indicates that the programs, at best, produces results equivalent to the classroom.... not superior to. Gates is throwing money at almost everything in secondary education (largely leaving K-8 out in the cold). Just because he throws money at it does not mean it is working. In fact, the research done by his own people has been rather mixed on how productive his funded initiatives have been. I give him credit for trying, but the public needs to realize that just because Gates funds it doesn't mean it works or ever will. I never said replace all teachers, or schools entirely. I think people are reading what they want to read. Well, I did add the down with the SCHOOLS chant, but that was obviously a joke. At least it should have obviously been a joke. I'm not for more of the same though, and in that sense, I don't want more "schools" humping the old models. The idea is kids can watch and or read at home, then go to school for questions, answers, additional explanation. Instead of teachers spending time, repeating very basic information in the 50 minutes alotted to them. So, instead of a teacher explaining plate tectonics in class, he'd simply say learn plate tectonics on the website (watch videos explaining it, by various teachers, and read the book section), then when they show up in class the next day they simply ask questions they are confused about, rather than going over the whole thing in class, which is a waste of time for a teacher and most students, IMO. So, instead of the teacher spending 40 minutes going over stuff that is already in a video, or book, and spending 10 minutes answering questions, now they could spend 50 minutes. Thus it's better in my opinion. And yes, some could learn exclusively from the videos/book, but I never said there would be no school or real teachers. It would be cheaper, IMO, because each teacher could now spend more time per student helping them get over "humps". So, instead of hiring more teachers to increase the one on one teacher to student time, it would increase without additional cost because the teachers would not be spending time simply repeating the book or video. And for some kids the videos would be enough to get most concepts. Why make them sit through a class if they are already proficient? So, they can study something else or have less school days possibly. Anyway, My point is more money, is not always the answer, nor is simply forcing kids to sit in a desk the answer, using the same tired teacher at a blackboard model simply repeating for the most part what is in the book, which was my experience of "school" for a very large part.
|