RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves

RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 6:31:21 PM)
Summersub... you are mistaken on a few things. LadyPact can speak for herself, but I do have to say something to you. Someone having a job is a sign of a few things, most of the time. Had you been around more often in your time here, you would know more about the women in which you speak. You have said that most of us want a man that makes more money than we do. Where are you getting that? Most said they want him able to take care of himself and not to be a drain upon us. It is a sign of adulthood to be self sustaining. If we don't care for a man not working... so be it. That isn't proof of a domina wanting her share and his too. To act as if we are all wanting something inappropriate and are all wanting something unreasonable is in itself unreasonable. There are some here that wish to live on the backs of men... some are professionals and really are professionals and deserve what they get for what they do and supply... some are demanding women thinking their pussy or the hope for a scent of it will bring them a bunch of worms with wallets. If you don't like one or the other, you are fully capable as an adult to walk away. To sit and bitch about it and talk as if all domina's are this or that... is a whine most of the time. Some of us simply want an adult and to work together on anything financial and we will walk away from someone that cannot or will not hold his own. It is up to you on how you are perceived here. Watch how you say things if it matters to you.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 6:57:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GreedyTop quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie quote: ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery well that wouldnt be me. i would leave the house spotless. i can cook, scrub floors, water plants and wash Your car if You wish. i would also be pleased to do hoovering and washing up dishes as well as making beds. what more could a Woman ask for kevin A stock 64 Mustang. I'd rather have a 71 Challenger, myself.. but I certainly wouldnt sniff at that Mustang! ;) I'll trade my 64 and your 71 for Pamela any day.

Iamsemisweet -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:05:44 PM)
Would you sleep in your own apartment that you paid for? Because that would be the only thing that makes this a good deal. I had a couple of vanilla boyfriends try to become my "house husband", while I worked my ass off at a demanding job. Fuck that. I like a nice lifestyle, good vacations, a well funded retirement. I can do it for me, I can't and I won't do it for two. Unless the woman is working full time and running a farm, and has several kids, it just would not be worth it. Freeloaders are so unattractive. quote: ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery i would also willing sleep in a tent if the Lady required that or sleep in a shed, a cage etc, as regards the rest i would cook for Her so i can only assume that the 7 or so hours weekly spent on cooking costing electricity i know would not be a problem to Her in the way of paying for it, if it was She would i trust always kick me out kevin

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:13:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery no . if someone agrees to accept me under their roof they make provisions. it s part of the deal. they are under no obligation to accept but if they do they know what i offer and what i dont kevin Kevin...let's be somewhat clear here. They have tits....pussy's, they smell better than we do, and they dress nicer (even on a bad day). You can't win this argument. (Even if you're right). Why? Because..... They have tits....pussy's, they smell better than we do, and they dress nicer (even on a bad day). (And if you're over 40....they have {a lot} more hair). (You lose....STFU.....you lose). Deal with it. JJ

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:16:36 PM)
[sm=Groaner.gif]

hausboy -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:32:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: summersub This thread is getting old but I do want to respond to some things including the last poster, Nanako. No I don't list my sexual interests first or really at all so I wonder what you read or read into my profile. You are right I don't post a picture, I guess thats why I don't get many replies. I am not going to be posting a picture anytime soon on the internet. I don't think I am whiny and if I am at least I am not as ignorant as the people who are denying that most dominant women want a man who makes more than they do. Especially Lady Pact who first said the OP was thinking with his dick, then said in the same post she wants someone well rounded and btw that includes someone with a job and then after all of this someone points out a thread where she said she would never ever date anyone who doesn't have a job. So I am sticking to my position that most women want a man with money and for sure LadyPact does and she said as much when she said she didn't have to financially support a man to get laid. The way I read that is men have to support women to get laid. Sorry if brining this up repeatedly is being whiny. The only thing I agree with is that people are taken out of context on these message boards, including the fact that I never once mentioned anything about being supported or being a live in and being supported and I don't think the OP did but it was somehow morphed into this thread that he expected to be supported. summersub: I respectfully must disagree. I think it's a fairly safe assumption that most Americans (I do not know how it translates to other cultures) would prefer to have more money than less. I've never heard someone complain that they make too much money and it's a problem for them. Your statement that dominant women want men who make more than them is completely unfounded, and I've seen quite a few different configurations of couples. I would argue that most dominant women who are pursuing a relationship, also want financial stability. Being unemployed is not a character flaw--esp. in these economic times. But someone who has never worked because they can't keep a job, keep getting fired, have a drug/alcohol problem etc. is a red flag for anyone seeking a relationship--not just Dommes. My ex-wife (and Domme) made more money than me for likely our entire 14 year relationship. It was never an issue, not once. I'm back in the dating circle now, and generally, women want someone who is employed (or seeking employment..or has a history of employment) because it does imply reliability, responsibility and stability. And from the personal ads I've read, the guys see chronic unemployment (not related to a disability) as a red flag too.

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:42:26 PM)
You know, I am going to go out on a limb here. I am disabled. I am not on disability, but that could change in the next four years as I have just lost the next six years of planned income from a private source. I am still not seeking a man to support me and am not seeking the tax payers dime for as long as I can hold out. I am not changing one damn thing in how I decide what I want or what I want. Which is... money or not, job or not... whatever... a man that fits me. Now that is no easy thing to find because of who and what I am... because of my health, my son, my teeth and now... my lack of income. Men judge me all the time. They don't see what I did with my life, what my jobs were... they are all in the past so to speak. We keep hearing that women want men to take care of them, support them, give to them all that is financial and how awful it is for them to have reasonable expectations. What about the men? I have had men disrespect me, think I made bad choices somewhere to have landed where I am and because I can't keep up with the Jones' any longer. They write me... wow, you are intelligent and seem so real and then I tell them a bit more than I readily share in my profile and those suckers are running for the hills! lol So the next time you guys decide to get on women because of this money thing... come see me and let's see if you can hang. ROFL

hausboy -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:55:34 PM)
Hey Lockit Thanks for sharing this. I hope you don't think that's what I was implying--what we earn is certainly NOT an indication of what we are worth as people. the folks that are red flags for me due to employment issues are those who can't seem to hang onto to a job for more than a few months at a time.... and not due to health reasons. I believe it's not uncommon for someone to get fired....but if a woman (or man) seems to get fired from almost every job, that tells me there's something else going on.

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 7:58:43 PM)
Oh Housboy... I wasn't responding to you! I am sorry! You just reminded me of something with something you said and I thought... what the hell... lets call their cards! They don't want to be wanted for their precious money or to be expected to have a job or some substance... so... how about a domina that won't take your money and doesn't want it, but has none and nothing now? lol You are a sweetheart!

hausboy -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 8:09:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit Oh Housboy... I wasn't responding to you! I am sorry! You just reminded me of something with something you said and I thought... what the hell... lets call their cards! They don't want to be wanted for their precious money or to be expected to have a job or some substance... so... how about a domina that won't take your money and doesn't want it, but has none and nothing now? lol You are a sweetheart! or my personal favorite: (I've seen it on a profile here) the one who wants to live in your house,not work a paid job, eat your food, not contribute to the expenses, and wants all of THEIR fantasies fulfilled. but they will be your complete slave. why wouldn't you want them around?!!

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 8:12:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hausboy quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit Oh Housboy... I wasn't responding to you! I am sorry! You just reminded me of something with something you said and I thought... what the hell... lets call their cards! They don't want to be wanted for their precious money or to be expected to have a job or some substance... so... how about a domina that won't take your money and doesn't want it, but has none and nothing now? lol You are a sweetheart! or my personal favorite: (I've seen it on a profile here) the one who wants to live in your house,not work a paid job, eat your food, not contribute to the expenses, and wants all of THEIR fantasies fulfilled. but they will be your complete slave. why wouldn't you want them around?!! LOL... at least I have a bit more going for me! This place is paid for, thankfully because I planned well and it has everything we could need if you don't mind a mobile home! Come on boys... one classy Jerry Springerish domina just for you! Come and get me! hehehehehe

LadyPact -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/5/2011 8:12:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: summersub This thread is getting old but I do want to respond to some things including the last poster, Nanako. No I don't list my sexual interests first or really at all so I wonder what you read or read into my profile. You are right I don't post a picture, I guess thats why I don't get many replies. I am not going to be posting a picture anytime soon on the internet. I don't think I am whiny and if I am at least I am not as ignorant as the people who are denying that most dominant women want a man who makes more than they do. Especially Lady Pact who first said the OP was thinking with his dick, then said in the same post she wants someone well rounded and btw that includes someone with a job and then after all of this someone points out a thread where she said she would never ever date anyone who doesn't have a job. So I am sticking to my position that most women want a man with money and for sure LadyPact does and she said as much when she said she didn't have to financially support a man to get laid. The way I read that is men have to support women to get laid. Sorry if brining this up repeatedly is being whiny. The only thing I agree with is that people are taken out of context on these message boards, including the fact that I never once mentioned anything about being supported or being a live in and being supported and I don't think the OP did but it was somehow morphed into this thread that he expected to be supported. Excuse Me, dear, but that isn't what I said here. My first comment on this thread was that I don't think with My (proverbial) dick. I didn't accuse the OP of thinking with one. It was a simple statement that I do not. Like most women, I can get dick any day of the week, so I don't have to chase it. I happen to be 42 (almost 43) years old. It isn't that often that a man close to My age can get My attention who isn't self supporting in some way. To Me, it speaks to his character. My boys really are men. If they can't be that, I don't want them.

lobodomslavery -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 1:30:46 AM)
i would be open to serving a Dominant Couple regardless of who was more Dominant but not a man alone. its just me. im not attracted to men. its nothing to do with sex, i dont want to have sex with anyone man or Woman but i just want to serve Women domestically is that so incredible that a guy will offer his services no strings attached kevin

SadisticMs2 -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 6:40:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery i would be open to serving a Dominant Couple regardless of who was more Dominant but not a man alone. its just me. im not attracted to men. its nothing to do with sex, i dont want to have sex with anyone man or Woman but i just want to serve Women domestically is that so incredible that a guy will offer his services no strings attached kevin Really, it's not all that incredible. Someone pays your living expenses....you futz around all day dragging out a couple hours of work and pretend it takes you all week, then expect them to find that incredible and wonderful.

AneNoz -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 7:47:34 AM)
It is the duty of the owner to provide for all needs of a slave. If an owner is not in a position financially to do thus then they are in no position to have a slave. This is simply as it is and should be. Does one not provide for the needs of one's dogs and horses and other chattels? It is, as well, also the right of the owner to derive economic benefit from the skills of the slave. If a slave gives not the benefit of its skills and abilities and the fruits thereof, they are not a slave, but merely one who plays at the role. This, as before, as well, is simply as it is and as it should be. Does one not exploit one's varied assets and possessions for their economic potentials? The mundane talents and skills of My Beloveds have been employed, at times of my choosing, by associates and friends of myself. Any compensation for these duties is for myself as a matter of course, just as if one were to hire from me a horse for the day. My Beloveds belong to me and as such their labours and the fruits thereof are belonging also to me should I choose that their duties include service in that manner. Be at peace Aneka

Lockit -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 7:58:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AneNoz It is the duty of the owner to provide for all needs of a slave. If an owner is not in a position financially to do thus then they are in no position to have a slave. This is simply as it is and should be. Does one not provide for the needs of one's dogs and horses and other chattels? It is, as well, also the right of the owner to derive economic benefit from the skills of the slave. If a slave gives not the benefit of its skills and abilities and the fruits thereof, they are not a slave, but merely one who plays at the role. This, as before, as well, is simply as it is and as it should be. Does one not exploit one's varied assets and possessions for their economic potentials? The mundane talents and skills of My Beloveds have been employed, at times of my choosing, by associates and friends of myself. Any compensation for these duties is for myself as a matter of course, just as if one were to hire from me a horse for the day. My Beloveds belong to me and as such their labours and the fruits thereof are belonging also to me should I choose that their duties include service in that manner. Be at peace Aneka You say be at peace after a statement on how owners must do things? Really clueless in that! How about you do it your way and call it good, because personally I think that was the longest shit I have read in a while and that is saying something.

AneNoz -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 8:06:46 AM)
This is because you but play at ownership. Be at peace Aneka

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 8:11:16 AM)
Bless your heart.

AneNoz -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 8:13:27 AM)
The blessings of my Goddess as well upon you. Be at peace Aneka

Nanako -> RE: Big difference between master and mistresses looking for slaves (9/6/2011 8:28:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery its just me. im not attracted to men. ..... but i just want to serve Women domestically is that so incredible that a guy will offer his services no strings attached kevin well then there are bloody strings attached [:@] Whether or not you sincerely want physical sexual contact, you're determine to only serve someone you find attractive, because you get off on it. That implies that to get your service, someone has to be attractive to you and stay that way. there's also the string of them having to spend time with you and make you feel good for doing it. If you sincerely want to serve someone with "no strings attached", you'll arrange with them to let yourself in the back door quietly, clean the house while they're at work, and be gone before they return. There's no need for you to ever have contact with them. And thus, their looks or gender are entirely irrelevant except to you getting your rocks off.

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875