Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
This is an offshoot of a thread in the Ask a Mistress forum, that I didn't want to hijack, but wanted to see some feedback on, from everyone. A boy was asking advice about dressing up for a fetish party and what to wear. In part of his post, he said that the club he'd be attending had a strict dress code of "either formal wear, full uniform, leather, latex, vinyl ONLY. NO exceptions." I asked if anyone took issue with this kind of dress code for a lifestyle event. One of the Mistresses replied it wasn't a lifestyle event so much as maybe a private club event. Now, a private club, I wouldn't have this issue with. (In fact, if someone took issue, my answer would be to simply not join - not go.) But if it were a lifestyle event, open to the general lifestyle population, I would take issue with such a dress code. (Especially since I am a big time pajama fetishist.) It seems a bit too restrictive based on wardrobes. Right off the top of my head, I notice that it leaves no room for those dressed in rubber or PVC. It also leaves no room for age players that dress in diapers or little girl/boy garb, or for "comfort fetishists" that enjoy cotton, fleece, velvet, and the softer materials (unless done in the context of formal or uniform wear). It leaves no room for humiliation dress-up, such as a slave forced to wear a clown suit. Or furries. Or any costuming that doesn't fall under "formal or uniform" (such as pirates and religious robes). And of course the thought crossed my mind of people who are simply unable to dress up to the standards of the dress code. Folks may have disabilities or ailments that prevent wearing corse, tight materials (inflammatory psoriasis comes to mind). Or maybe one's size is an issue. Or finances simply don't permit extravagent wardrobes. Should all of these people not be permitted in? Now, I come back to, if it's a private club, then sure. I have no problem with private clubs/venues/groups setting any rules they want. I'm all for exclusionary groups. And if an exclusionary group wants to boot people at the door for having a mole on their arm, more power to them. I personally have been denied access to one group I knew I would fit in very well. The group had the same basic beliefs, principles, and ideals. But they didn't allow parents. Disappointing, but... Their right. Their choice. But what about general "lifestyle events" that aren't private clubs, or who advertise their events as "open to all lifestylists/fetishists" or simply don't mention any type of exclusionary rule or private membership? Should they be permitted to set an exclusionary dress code? Does it even make sense for a group of people who end up half naked by the end of the evening to even have a dress code? This is an issue I could easily play Devil's Advocate on, and argue from either side. I could, without a blink, adocate for or against either side of the coin. I'm just curious how others feel about it.
_____________________________
IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).
|