'Lamestream media' defends Palin (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/17/2011 10:21:36 PM)

I agree that the book goes overboard and should get trashed.

http://news.yahoo.com/lamestream-media-defends-palin-093100032.html

They kicked her around, victimized her, tried to destroy her. But all of a sudden, the lamestream media is coming to Sarah Palin’s defense.

Faced with a barrage of negative portrayals — a much-hyped investigative book, a Levi Johnston memoir and a new movie — Palin is finding support in the unlikeliest of places.

Film reviewers have slammed the British documentary “Sarah Palin: You Betcha!” Newspapers have refused to run comic-strip excerpts of Joe McGinniss’s rumor-mongering tome “The Rogue.” Johnston’s accusations have been consigned to the gossip pages. And none other than The New York Times has angrily taken Palin’s side in a brutal takedown of the McGinniss book.

Reviewer Janet Maslin called “The Rogue” a work of “caustic, unsubstantiated gossip,” accusing its author, who rented a house next door to the Palins for a time, of sloppiness, attention seeking and a lack of neighborliness.

“‘The Rogue’ is too busy being nasty to be lucid,” Maslin concludes, describing its many accusations as “indefensibly reckless.”




farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/17/2011 10:32:40 PM)

I didn't see Janet Maslin use her review to refute any of the claims made by McGinniss...




Hillwilliam -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/17/2011 10:40:13 PM)

When the ACLU came out in support of Rush when he had his problems facing charges for "Doctor Shopping" I didn't think it could get wierder.

This might be wierder.




Owner59 -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/17/2011 10:43:23 PM)

If the work was questionable then it should be questioned.




Hillwilliam -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/17/2011 10:45:56 PM)

ABSOLUTELY. Just because a lie is about someone you happen to not like doesn't make it less of a lie.




Arpig -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 12:49:25 AM)

The last line of the article pretty much sums it up for me:
quote:

“Sometimes trash is trash,” he said, “and you have to call it for what it is no matter who it comes from or who it’s about.”





farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 7:40:26 AM)

Again, she calls it trash, but doesn't provide any evidence that it's factually incorrect.




Owner59 -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 8:56:18 AM)

The "jornalist`s" primary job is credibility and getting the story right.And with ease.


If he/she can`t do that straight off,right away,they aren`t doing their jobs.

It isn`t up to us (or the Palins in this case)to prove them wrong.

They,have the burden of proof.

It`s the author who must be convincing and have their homework done.

This is trash-abloid-sexy-story-meaningless-bullshit.

There`s just nothing there cept some guy who claims he did her years ago.Big fuck`n whoop.

This book was meant to harm and demean and make money from salacious ~sheck-schay~ rumors.

This time,with this "author",she is being victimized.With this "book",that isn`t a hard argument to make.





farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 9:10:27 AM)


quote:

There`s just nothing there cept some guy who claims he did her years ago.Big fuck`n whoop.


Weeeeelll... Iffn she didn't advocate abstinence, maybe it wouldn't be noteworthy. But given her public stance, pre-marital interracial sex is something to consider when evaluating her credibility.




Owner59 -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 9:20:24 AM)

Blah blah blah, Farg.

Trash by any other name still stinks.





DarkSteven -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 9:50:49 AM)

They're not defending Palin as much as journalistic integrity.




Owner59 -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 9:53:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

They're not defending Palin as much as journalistic integrity.



This.

My "bias" is toward sun-light and credibilty.




Lucylastic -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 11:19:29 AM)

I have every expectation that I will read those books with as much gusto and interest as I read her books.
which is NONE.
I have no desire to fill my brain with "her" bad or "self indulgent"




Hillwilliam -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 11:20:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

There`s just nothing there cept some guy who claims he did her years ago.Big fuck`n whoop.


Weeeeelll... Iffn she didn't advocate abstinence, maybe it wouldn't be noteworthy. But given her public stance, pre-marital interracial sex is something to consider when evaluating her credibility.

Not to be nitpicky but why does it matter if pre marital sex is interracial or not?




farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 11:39:45 AM)

The NYT defending journalistic integrity?

Hold on... Let me stop laughing first and then I'll get to a response to that...

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

They're not defending Palin as much as journalistic integrity.





farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 11:40:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

There`s just nothing there cept some guy who claims he did her years ago.Big fuck`n whoop.


Weeeeelll... Iffn she didn't advocate abstinence, maybe it wouldn't be noteworthy. But given her public stance, pre-marital interracial sex is something to consider when evaluating her credibility.

Not to be nitpicky but why does it matter if pre marital sex is interracial or not?


It does if you promote yourself to a base of racist rednecks...




farglebargle -> RE: 'Lamestream media' defends Palin (9/18/2011 11:42:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

They're not defending Palin as much as journalistic integrity.



This.

My "bias" is toward sun-light and credibilty.


Fine. Let's hear a credible explanation of how someone goes into labor in Texas, and then hops a few airline segments back to Buttfuck, Alaska in order to deliver a baby...

Personally, until I see some birth certificates, I don't buy the story...




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875