Proprietrix -> RE: Primal Rewards (5/26/2006 7:58:13 AM)
|
I have a friend who is a female Dominant. She gets into wrestling with her subs. And like you, she believes she should be the winner of each match.I don't agree. She and I have gone round and round about this. (Although I'm unsure why. I personally have no problem with how she does things, but she seems to want to convert me or something.) She actually gets kind of pissy and mad if her sub overpowers her on the mat. Living in a household where wrestling is a pretty normative thing, (teenage son and umpteen friends who are on the team and plan to go "pro"), I have difficulty playing with a guy who wants me to win. It's kind of like "What's the point?" I enjoy the challenge. I enjoy the take-downs and holds, whether he's doing them or I'm doing them. For him to "wimp out" and "let me win" is kind of insulting. Win some. Lose some. Enjoy the game, not the belt. Ok, maybe we take wrestling a bit too seriously in my home. Or maybe it's that when I'm wrestling, I'm not thinking D/s play. (Keeping myself from digressing here.) Even in other types of primal play (if I were to engage in them), I 1) would not want the sub to "give in and let me win" and 2) there probably wouldn't be a reward issued anyway. Because, like I said, it's about the game, not the prize. So hypothetically thinking here... say I'm going to do a rape scene with my sub. I'm going to subdue him, and I don't know, fuck him with X object. (Plunger came to mind, but I didn't want to get off on a safety tangent.) If I win... my prize is his ass. If he wins.. his prize is his lack of victimization. We're not going to set a cookie on the mantle and the winner gets the cookie. The purpose of our role play would have been to enjoy the roleplay. I can't wrap my head around most roleplay anyway though. It feels theatrical and fake to me. Him "letting me win" would make it feel even more so. Maybe I totally read your question wrong. Who knows. At least I tried to answer. lol
|
|
|
|