aromanholiday
Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011 Status: offline
|
"A man's a man Is Herr Brecht's contention But that is something that anyone might mention, So Herr Brecht appends this item to the bill: that you can do with a human being what you will. "You can take a man apart like an automobile And it's a process he won't even feel. "You can look at a fellow One man to another and politely but firmly tell him, Brother, get used to this world as it is And let rot that fish you planned to boil in your private pot "You now will see the ground beneath your feet Melt away like sleet. "And please don't miss the moral of the case: That this world is a dangerous place." ------------ I'm essentially saying I'm in agreement with Mike Sojurner. With the right techniques and knowledge, anything that a human being is, thinks, or does can be changed. Not all masters or mistresses have this such skills and knowledge, obviously, or want it. Should he or she try? If we're really talking about a master-slave relationship consensually entered into, and not a dom-sub one masquerading as a master-slave relationship, then that's entirely up to the owner of the slave, I would think. I place no moral weight upon this one way or the other. "How much has your Master or Mistress changed who you are? Have any of those changes been to the core of who you are as a person or just some behaviors if any? Would you want to be changed at the core of who you are?" I don't mean to sound critical here, but I am having trouble answering these questions. The word "core" is stopping me. A "core" of a human being is one of those emotionally-laden but highly vague words that is very difficult to pin down even though we all imagine we know what it means. What you might consider part of your core might be something I consider part of my false surface personality which has no bearing on who I really am. And vice-versa, most certainly! Can you define this term a bit more specifically? I can say a little about this. Each of my masters has changed me in fundamental ways. Behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, habits, physical appearance, even personality traits have been changed. To date, however, (and I believe this is an important point to consider if we want to avoid rolling off the hysterical emotional edge when discussing such a laden term such as "cores,"--you are doing fine, btw, I'm speaking of what I expect to see posting after you) the thing that has changed my personal core identity the most has been life circumstances which were not consciously caused by any human being. People are part of their environments and they are sensitive to them. That sensitivity causes changes, sometimes profound ones. So, should I try to sue life or charge it with criminal negligence for successfully and most nonconsensually changing my core self? ;-) Of course not, but I'm certain some pontificating moralists who are not very deep in the thinking department will probably say so about masters. It would be very nice to be proven wrong about this, but in this place... well, let's just say I'm not holding my breath. Here's the question that interests me: Why should someone consciously and deliberately entering into a master-slave relationship as a slave think that it is immoral for their master and owner, the one they have supposedly given all of themselves to, to effect changes in them similar to what plain old life brings about?
_____________________________
"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?" My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.
|