Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 12:10:07 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I am not meaning that Obama is trying to be aloof, I am of the opinion that he is aloof, totally aloof, and I am by far not the only one making that observation. Critics in his own party openly and loudly resent him for that character flaw, its not something people anticipated when they worked so hard to get him elected. I personally like it though, I like that he is failing to implement the far left agenda on account of it.

The bigger issue for me is the contrasting portrayals between him and Mr Bush



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to MissAsylum)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 12:31:20 PM   
MissAsylum


Posts: 1863
Joined: 1/9/2009
Status: offline 		That's more than fair.

I would hope that no president would try to fully go along with the game plan of extremes of either side.
Results would be disastrous no matter which way it would go.


_____________________________

I hate when I'm wearing my apple bottom jeans, but i can't find my boots with the fur.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 2:02:09 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I see your point

In many of these threads only the men are capable of addressing posts "with more than bullshit partisan snarks"

Do us all a favor and us know when you and lucy are finally manly enough to address us without the bullshit snarks yourself okay

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

When you can man up and address the other threads with more than bullshit partisan snarks, then we can discuss the merits of Eisenhower.



Sanity, Eat. Dirt.


Ah, thank you hlen. If someone doesnt repost what the.. ahem... say... then I wont see it. and only the .. ahem.... can take my comment about a single person owning up to their partisan lies and denials when faced with proof from many sources and turn it into a man vs woman battle.

any wonder why i have the ... ahem.... on ignore?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 11/26/2011 2:03:20 PM >

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 2:07:44 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

The bigger issue for me is the contrasting portrayals between him and Mr Bush





W the inept treasonous imbecile, and Obama, the man who sent a whole fuckwad of terrorists on the el Al flight to Allah?

What comparisons or contrasts are possible between apples and oranges?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 4:39:23 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline 		Nato need to stop getting it wrong with these air attacks. Boots on the ground is the only answer, cheney and rumsfeld felt you only needed to carry out air strikes, but that is proving ineffective.

As for Obama taking time off to play golf, when he does this, let me know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJvRUL81ZU8

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 5:01:48 PM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		NATO is just a codename to USA in these matters. It should be clear to everybody. 

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 5:08:56 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I see your point

In many of these threads only the men are capable of addressing posts "with more than bullshit partisan snarks"

Do us all a favor and us know when you and lucy are finally manly enough to address us without the bullshit snarks yourself okay

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

When you can man up and address the other threads with more than bullshit partisan snarks, then we can discuss the merits of Eisenhower.



Sanity, Eat. Dirt.


Ah, thank you hlen. If someone doesnt repost what the.. ahem... say... then I wont see it. and only the .. ahem.... can take my comment about a single person owning up to their partisan lies and denials when faced with proof from many sources and turn it into a man vs woman battle.

any wonder why i have the ... ahem.... on ignore?

Sorry Tazz I wrongly assumed you had seen it,but his lie about you and then him implying that he was the only "man" on the board was so laughable that I thought you would be along to deal with it:)
My bad.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 5:14:48 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

Thats because he is an ... ahem... and doesnt understand what my initial post was about.

more .. ahem... spin

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 5:17:55 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

NATO is just a codename to USA in these matters. It should be clear to everybody. 



Its not a codename to all the dead of other nations, halfwit.

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 5:33:48 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I hate to be the one to break it to you but you totally fail to understand what I wrote or "implied" luce

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Sorry Tazz I wrongly assumed you had seen it,but his lie about you and then him implying that he was the only "man" on the board was so laughable that I thought you would be along to deal with it:)
My bad.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 6:26:47 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline 		Actually other than forward observers of some type, the best play book startegy out there is almost all air based attacks when fighting an insurgency or rebels that are in rural areas. Good intelligence is mandatory, and then with drones or cruise you can do most of the rest. Very few operations would require boots on the ground, and those would be surgical special ops missions.

Not sure about all the bickering, but the US did make a fuck up with what happened, especially since the day before there were talks with the Pakistani militart and improving communication and coordination to prevent this type of things from occuring.

Actually, the US has been stomping all over their sovereignty for several years now, along with a few other countries. Now do not get me wrong, I am all behind hitting the enemy where ever they are, but the State dept needs to work something out, or Pakistan needs to be held accountable for harboring terrorist and enemies of the US.

As far as a President playing golf, that is just partisan BS because all of the presidents need down time.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Nato need to stop getting it wrong with these air attacks. Boots on the ground is the only answer, cheney and rumsfeld felt you only needed to carry out air strikes, but that is proving ineffective.

As for Obama taking time off to play golf, when he does this, let me know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJvRUL81ZU8



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 6:32:53 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline 		"Actually other than forward observers of some type, the best play book startegy out there is almost all air based attacks when fighting an insurgency or rebels that are in rural areas. Good intelligence is mandatory, and then with drones or cruise you can do most of the rest"

We will have to differ Orion, so far this strategy hasnt worked. If anything, before Obamas troop surge, the allies were on the point of losing out to the Taliban.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:11:54 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I was playing off of taz implying that the feminine gender is wholly incapable of posting on topic, and without snark

Where have you disproven taz's gender slam on this thread, lucy?


Oh my! What an intellectual tour de force!

Sanity's breathtakingly in(s)ane misinterpretations of the comments of two individual women are sufficient grounds for damning the entire feminine gender.

Such erudition! Such astonishingly profound powers of analysis and logic! Such a compelling irrefutable argument! Why isn't Sanity a Nobel Prize Laureate?

Puh-leeeeaze, can someone give the man a frock and heels. NOW!

_____________________________



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:15:58 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I was just joking at first, but... its becoming apparent that there could be something to taz's little anti-fem admonition






< Message edited by Sanity -- 11/26/2011 7:17:15 PM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:20:16 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I was playing off of taz implying that the feminine gender is wholly incapable of posting on topic, and without snark

Where have you disproven taz's gender slam on this thread, lucy?


Oh my! What an intellectual tour de force!

Sanity's breathtakingly in(s)ane misinterpretations of the comments of two individual women are sufficient grounds for damning the entire feminine gender.

Such erudition! Such astonishingly profound powers of analysis and logic! Such a compelling irrefutable argument! Why isn't Sanity a Nobel Prize Laureate?

Puh-leeeeaze, can someone give the man a frock and heels. NOW!

most CDs I know have more testicular fortitude than he will ever have



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:25:14 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

"Actually other than forward observers of some type, the best play book startegy out there is almost all air based attacks when fighting an insurgency or rebels that are in rural areas. Good intelligence is mandatory, and then with drones or cruise you can do most of the rest"

We will have to differ Orion, so far this strategy hasnt worked. If anything, before Obamas troop surge, the allies were on the point of losing out to the Taliban.

It's worth adding (IMHO) Polite, that the tactics of air attacks are regarded with contempt by Afghani people. They see such attacks as cowardly, an unfair fight. Add the element of nationalism - the air crews and planes are foreign, their victims are Afghani - and you have a recipe for disaster.

If the overall aim is to win "the hearts and minds of the people" - the critical objective upon which the success or failure of a counter-insurgency campaign swings - it's hard to think of a method more likely to produce the opposite effect with Afghanis, short of putting the entire peasantry up against a wall and shooting them.

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:26:16 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Just to set the record straight. pops has avoided me on many threads lately. posting things he insists are true, then running away when its proven they are not.... and he could have saved himself the embarrassment if he had not gone the snark route in those threads and simply fact checked himself before posting.

lies are bs.

being snarky in posts containing lies is stupid.

running from a thread, not admitting you made a mistake.. an action of a boy... not a man.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:27:27 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
To many, that depends entirely on whether the president has a D or an R by his name, hence the premise of the thread (at least before the usual trolls went for their usual derail).

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

As far as a President playing golf, that is just partisan BS because all of the presidents need down time.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:29:36 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline 		It is because of bad intel. The tribal chiefs have to be pulled in to get the intel. Even the soviets thought boots on the grounds was the way to go, and see what that got them. Putting more troops there doesn't do much other than secure an area somewhat, and the insurgents just move to another area and now have a target for hit and run, and ambush attacks.

Good intel and unmanned strikes reduce our casualties, increase effectiveness of not know where we are going to hit, and if actually done surgically with good intel, reduces agitation of the locals. The problem is the good intel at the moment.

It is not so much my opinion, but a tactical guide written several years ago by a retired Admiral. Would have to do some searching to find it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

"Actually other than forward observers of some type, the best play book startegy out there is almost all air based attacks when fighting an insurgency or rebels that are in rural areas. Good intelligence is mandatory, and then with drones or cruise you can do most of the rest"

We will have to differ Orion, so far this strategy hasnt worked. If anything, before Obamas troop surge, the allies were on the point of losing out to the Taliban.



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack - 11/26/2011 7:35:45 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I was playing off of taz implying that the feminine gender is wholly incapable of posting on topic, and without snark

Where have you disproven taz's gender slam on this thread, lucy?


Oh my! What an intellectual tour de force!

Sanity's breathtakingly in(s)ane misinterpretations of the comments of two individual women are sufficient grounds for damning the entire feminine gender.

Such erudition! Such astonishingly profound powers of analysis and logic! Such a compelling irrefutable argument! Why isn't Sanity a Nobel Prize Laureate?

Puh-leeeeaze, can someone give the man a frock and heels. NOW!

most CDs I know have more testicular fortitude than he will ever have



That's my experience too, Lucy. I do hope that I haven't given the impression that I was denigrating CDs. That wasn't my intention at all. As someone said, it takes balls for a male to wear a frock.

Rather, given that we know the location of most male brains, I was hoping that the boost in testicular fortitude might give rise to a desperately-needed boost to Sanity's lamentable powers of intellectual analysis and discourse - eternal optimist that I am!

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 11/26/2011 7:45:24 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 24 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in NATO Attack Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105