Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health)


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 4:51:15 PM   
Kittynoir


Posts: 27
Joined: 11/25/2011
Status: offline
Before engaging with any new partner I always like to get an all clear from the sexual health clinic to know for sure I wont be passing any potential STI's from an old partner to a new one, even if I trust the old partners word and loyalty it's always nice to know for sure.
Is there anybody else who practices this religiously as I do, or only once a year, or however the rota maybe? What are your thoughts?


_______________________________
(if this is in the wrong section pls don't delete, just go ahead and move it to the applicable section ty)
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 5:05:53 PM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
Without going into all the gory details of my love life (or lack thereof) I haven't had the need to do it prior to just recently, as there wasn't any searching for a new partner going on. But yes, since I am now in a position to be looking, I did get tested. I would expect the same of any potential partner. If he hasn't been tested, he will be. :) Not that a positive result will necessarily negate the relationship, but to be aware and take adequate precautions if we do choose to move forward. It seems so simple, you know? Who wouldn't do that?

Through course of conversation with my doctor when I was talking to her about it, she told me that in her experience, very few people get tested as a matter of course in between partners, which I found unbelievable. I guess I'm so used to reading posts here on CM, where we are all pretty open and up front about sexual practices and risks and the importance of being tested.

(in reply to Kittynoir)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 8:32:24 PM   
Soyokaze


Posts: 390
Joined: 4/1/2007
Status: offline
I get tested for HIV regularly, and since I have what seems to be a hella thorough endocrinologist I get tested for a bunch of other stuff regularly too. It's pretty rare I'm doing things with people I can't trust and when I do I stick with safe (relatively) stuff.

_____________________________

"When I was a little kid, I wish the first word I ever said was 'quote' so right before I died I could say 'end quote'" -Steven Wright

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 8:39:54 PM   
hausboy


Posts: 2360
Joined: 9/5/2010
Status: offline
Hi Kittynoir--

Before my (now ex) and I became monogamous, we both got tested for a variety of STDs.... just to give us a baseline.  We practiced safer sex for all 14 years that we were together.

The only problem with getting tested--it only tells you the results that apply to the day of the test.  It is possible for some STDs to not appear in the tests as positive even if you are carrying them....and let's face it, some people cheat...so if your partner has sex with someone else, that "clean bill of health" from a few months ago won't mean much.

It's fine as a baseline, but quite honestly, I tried to rely on honesty and good communication, and I still practiced safer sex for the extent of my relationship.

(in reply to Kittynoir)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 9:33:47 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
I've been with Master for over 5 years now but when we first decided to get serious I had a full STD test done at a clinic. I haven't had one since though since we've been monogamous with each other and we're both clean.

Before Master I had std tests done from time to time but not regularly since I didn't really sleep around casually.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to hausboy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/27/2011 9:37:31 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
Better safe than sorry I always say

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 4:23:49 AM   
TheFireWithinMe


Posts: 1672
Joined: 10/3/2011
From: The Depths of Hell
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I've been with Master for over 5 years now but when we first decided to get serious I had a full STD test done at a clinic. I haven't had one since though since we've been monogamous with each other and we're both clean.

Before Master I had std tests done from time to time but not regularly since I didn't really sleep around casually.



Just a question. Not to imply that Kana isn't trustworthy but how did you know absolutely for sure that he was monogamous? You know you can trust him now but personally I would be getting tested regularly just to be sure.

_____________________________

Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags

There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast. ~Author Unknown

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 5:04:32 AM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
Some people you know you can trust. Some people you *hope* you can trust. I imagine Kana is in the first category rather than the latter. (but since I'm not in their relationship, I couldn't begin to guess. She is, so she probably has a better idea than we do on if he can be trusted or not.)

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 5:12:23 AM   
LillyBoPeep


Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline
I imagine, like any other relationship, they worked it out to their own satisfaction. :p
To me, your question reads like "how do you just take him at his word" which... does imply a question of trustworthiness...

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica


(in reply to xxblushesxx)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 7:26:51 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFireWithinMe


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I've been with Master for over 5 years now but when we first decided to get serious I had a full STD test done at a clinic. I haven't had one since though since we've been monogamous with each other and we're both clean.

Before Master I had std tests done from time to time but not regularly since I didn't really sleep around casually.



Just a question. Not to imply that Kana isn't trustworthy but how did you know absolutely for sure that he was monogamous? You know you can trust him now but personally I would be getting tested regularly just to be sure.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

I imagine, like any other relationship, they worked it out to their own satisfaction. :p
To me, your question reads like "how do you just take him at his word" which... does imply a question of trustworthiness...


He came with fresh papers...and we still used protection for almost two years in. At least.

< Message edited by Kana -- 11/28/2011 7:31:53 AM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 8:36:15 AM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
I trust him..simple as that. I've never had a single reason to ever doubt him. If I couldn't trust him I would not even have thought of having a relationship with him let alone even going out on dates with him.

If I even have the slightest doubt in someone I can not bring myself to even want to get to know them even more.




_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 1:47:41 PM   
TheFireWithinMe


Posts: 1672
Joined: 10/3/2011
From: The Depths of Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

I imagine, like any other relationship, they worked it out to their own satisfaction. :p
To me, your question reads like "how do you just take him at his word" which... does imply a question of trustworthiness...


In a way yeah I was but - as I made CLEAR in my post not because I question his trustworthiness but because I was wondering. She didn't know him, not at first anyway and personally no matter how awesome the guy seems I can guarantee that testing will be happening.

ETA: thank you both for answering, I assure you both that no insult was intended, it was pure curiosity.

< Message edited by TheFireWithinMe -- 11/28/2011 1:49:44 PM >


_____________________________

Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags

There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast. ~Author Unknown

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 2:05:18 PM   
Duskypearls


Posts: 3561
Joined: 8/21/2011
Status: offline
While I may not be particularly well-bred, as it were, I am happy to say I do come with papers...very good, clean ones!

(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 2:23:43 PM   
HeatherMcLeather


Posts: 2559
Joined: 5/21/2011
From: The dog house
Status: offline
quote:

Not to imply that Kana isn't trustworthy but how did you know absolutely for sure that he was monogamous?
I don't know, maybe I'm naive, but I just can't imagine Kana lying about something like that, I see him more as the "I'm going to fuck this new bitch and your going to sit there and watch me do it." kind of guy.

With us we know we can trust each other because there is no need to hide it. That's the understanding, if you're going to sleep around you give everybody a head's up, so we're all in the know. I'm the only one who needs permission, the others are free to do what they please, as long as we are kept informed of anything that could impact the rest of us, like the possibility of outside contamination .

We all got tested when we moved in, and will do so again next month just to take into account the possibility of any hidden infections that didn't show up the first time. After that, we won't need to do so again until somebody goes outside the group.


(in reply to TheFireWithinMe)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 4:38:49 PM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
We used protection before both going hand and hand to the clinic. We wanted to be screened at the same time.
I had been tested prior to this because I once got a needle stick but Steve hadn't and so I think he was quite nervous. I was surprised at just how hard it was to get a test at the STD clinic. We had to fill in a questionnaire that asked questions like, have you visited Africa and had sex with an African? or had sex with a man who recently came from or visited Africa? Is your partner bi and if so has he had anal sex? do you have anal sex together? Because we had heard that some people have been refused tests because they were not high risk enough, we just answered yes to them all.

When we got the all clear we celebrated by taking a vile of each others blood and drinking it in a vodka shot.

We are just about to go and be re-done as Steve is now settling in with his new girl and doesn't want ongoing protective sex. I will get tested too for her peace of mind because sexually I would like some involvement.

Edited to say, I would never trust a new partner with all clear papers that had been done before we met. I don't know how many people they have had bareback sex with since the all clear.

< Message edited by MariaB -- 11/28/2011 4:42:31 PM >

(in reply to Duskypearls)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/28/2011 9:49:12 PM   
DaddyStoke


Posts: 3
Joined: 11/16/2011
Status: offline
Testing is a must. It calms you down. Additionally, the reaction of the other party when 'the discussion' is brought up is all too important. Anyone who has a fit about getting tested should be red flagged. Testing is the responsible thing to do.

(in reply to Kittynoir)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 11/29/2011 11:30:13 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
I get tested yearly with my GYN exam. Outside a committed relationship, I use condoms.

(in reply to Kittynoir)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 12/13/2011 4:17:31 PM   
subspacepilot2


Posts: 18
Joined: 7/24/2010
Status: offline
Sorry, certified STI free pretty much is only defined as an intact hymen.

STI testing is complex. (Disease includes signs/symptoms, and many infections transmitted sexually have no signs or symptoms).

Often a clinic will only test for HIV though many such as Planned Parenthood test for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphilis and HIV. I don't know of any who test for Herpes; HPV (Venereal Warts, other than an internal or visible check); Trichomoniasias; Chancroid; BV (Bacterial Vaginosis which is often not considered an STI, but can be) Mycoplasma Genitalium; Lymphogranuloma Venereum, or Molluscum Contagiosum. K9 activity, male or female can indroduce Brucellosis which then can be transmitted human to human. This ignores the odd ones such as a common sheep disease which has caused multiple deaths whereby a male has had sex with a sheep then has had sex with a woman who was pregnant resulting in a few miscarriages.

Additionally there are diseases that can be spread by sexual contact including Hepatitis A, B and C. Hepatitis is generally transmitted fecal/oral, but can be transmitted though common bdsm activity such as rimming, enemas or scat play. Hep B can be transmitted via semen, especially semen/oral. Hepatitis C is not considered an STI by CDC, but bdsm activity that includes abrasion, needles, scarification, or knife play puts it back into the realm of an STI.

I tend to think it wise for anyone that plays with many partners to get Hep A/Hep B innocculated, once done that knocks them out. People who do blood/knife/needle play stand a fairly high risk of contracting Hep C.

Herpes blood testing is not common, and as far as I know there is only one test that differentiates between HSV1 and 2 though the concept of oral siting versus genital siting has become largely irrevelant especially as teens have, to a fair degree, turned to oral sex to avoid pregnancy . Oropharyngeal cancer is spiking probably because of genital transmission of the virulent strains of HPV to the oral cavity via oral sex. Guardasil and the other HPV trivalent or quadrivalent vaccines for HPVwill prevent most of these cancers as well as related as most cervical cancers.

Then there are the latency periods for each disease where not waiting enough time will result in a false negative test when the person soon will be infective. Sadly many clinics really do not, or cannot give good latency periods for HIV. Increased testing efficiency for HIV has reduced the latency period but it is test dependent with some tests reacting within a week or two, and others longer.

Since most HSV transmits without visible lesions, in the absence of HSV blood testing, preferably one that differentiates between HSV-1 and HSV-2, the reality is almost nobody can say: "I"m clean." The most that they can say is "I've never had a visible outbreak that I know of." That is not reassuring since most transmittable outbreaks are not visible. The same goes for HPV and though there are blood tests for HPV I believe that there is no FDA approved blood test. Cervical samples or HPV outbreak (wart) samples are taken and using DNA technology tested to ID the virulent (cancer implicated) strains (or at least the most important strains) . HPV can be present and can be infective with no visible warts.
Therefore anyone who practices oral sex without using fluid barriers such as a dental dam (yuck) is at risk for HSV and HPV transmission as a matter of routine. Condoms help but since HSV can be present on areas not covered or protected by a condom this does not offer immunity.

The bottom line is that with each new partner you take on new risks. Being fluid/fluid free with current or prior partners for 4 weeks and then getting a standard STI screen (HIV; Chlamydia; Gonorrhea; Syphilis) along with a recent internal exam for a woman and a "look-see" for a guy really is about the best that one can do.

If you're poly, or have many partners you will, or already have multiple strains of HPV and you will or have HSV-1 & HSV-2. It's simple and it's a bummer, but its real. The best one can hope for if they want many partners is that they become an asymptomatic carrier of HSV. As mentioned before here, acyclovir can go a long way in preventing (at least for a while) transmission of a known HSV sufferer to one who might not have it, plus the acyclovir usually lessens the size/frequency and duration of a visible HSV lesion.

The safest methodology is to have longer, higher quality relationships with fewer lifetime partners--something that many in the bdsm realm simply are not interested in. Still, I believe that agreeing to be serially monogamous, and going 4-6 weeks without having had fluid/fluid transfer between humans, and then going together to a place like Planned Parenthood, get the results and then go for it. At least HIV, which is always deadly becomes a non-issue, and the major problematic STI's are also defined as a non-issue.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 12/13/2011 4:30:35 PM   
hausboy


Posts: 2360
Joined: 9/5/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subspacepilot2

Sorry, certified STI free pretty much is only defined as an intact hymen.

STI testing is complex. (Disease includes signs/symptoms, and many infections transmitted sexually have no signs or symptoms).

Often a clinic will only test for HIV though many such as Planned Parenthood test for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphilis and HIV. I don't know of any who test for Herpes; HPV (Venereal Warts, other than an internal or visible check); Trichomoniasias; Chancroid; BV (Bacterial Vaginosis which is often not considered an STI, but can be) Mycoplasma Genitalium; Lymphogranuloma Venereum, or Molluscum Contagiosum. K9 activity, male or female can indroduce Brucellosis which then can be transmitted human to human. This ignores the odd ones such as a common sheep disease which has caused multiple deaths whereby a male has had sex with a sheep then has had sex with a woman who was pregnant resulting in a few miscarriages.

Additionally there are diseases that can be spread by sexual contact including Hepatitis A, B and C. Hepatitis is generally transmitted fecal/oral, but can be transmitted though common bdsm activity such as rimming, enemas or scat play. Hep B can be transmitted via semen, especially semen/oral. Hepatitis C is not considered an STI by CDC, but bdsm activity that includes abrasion, needles, scarification, or knife play puts it back into the realm of an STI.

I tend to think it wise for anyone that plays with many partners to get Hep A/Hep B innocculated, once done that knocks them out. People who do blood/knife/needle play stand a fairly high risk of contracting Hep C.

Herpes blood testing is not common, and as far as I know there is only one test that differentiates between HSV1 and 2 though the concept of oral siting versus genital siting has become largely irrevelant especially as teens have, to a fair degree, turned to oral sex to avoid pregnancy . Oropharyngeal cancer is spiking probably because of genital transmission of the virulent strains of HPV to the oral cavity via oral sex. Guardasil and the other HPV trivalent or quadrivalent vaccines for HPVwill prevent most of these cancers as well as related as most cervical cancers.

Then there are the latency periods for each disease where not waiting enough time will result in a false negative test when the person soon will be infective. Sadly many clinics really do not, or cannot give good latency periods for HIV. Increased testing efficiency for HIV has reduced the latency period but it is test dependent with some tests reacting within a week or two, and others longer.

Since most HSV transmits without visible lesions, in the absence of HSV blood testing, preferably one that differentiates between HSV-1 and HSV-2, the reality is almost nobody can say: "I"m clean." The most that they can say is "I've never had a visible outbreak that I know of." That is not reassuring since most transmittable outbreaks are not visible. The same goes for HPV and though there are blood tests for HPV I believe that there is no FDA approved blood test. Cervical samples or HPV outbreak (wart) samples are taken and using DNA technology tested to ID the virulent (cancer implicated) strains (or at least the most important strains) . HPV can be present and can be infective with no visible warts.
Therefore anyone who practices oral sex without using fluid barriers such as a dental dam (yuck) is at risk for HSV and HPV transmission as a matter of routine. Condoms help but since HSV can be present on areas not covered or protected by a condom this does not offer immunity.

The bottom line is that with each new partner you take on new risks. Being fluid/fluid free with current or prior partners for 4 weeks and then getting a standard STI screen (HIV; Chlamydia; Gonorrhea; Syphilis) along with a recent internal exam for a woman and a "look-see" for a guy really is about the best that one can do.

If you're poly, or have many partners you will, or already have multiple strains of HPV and you will or have HSV-1 & HSV-2. It's simple and it's a bummer, but its real. The best one can hope for if they want many partners is that they become an asymptomatic carrier of HSV. As mentioned before here, acyclovir can go a long way in preventing (at least for a while) transmission of a known HSV sufferer to one who might not have it, plus the acyclovir usually lessens the size/frequency and duration of a visible HSV lesion.

The safest methodology is to have longer, higher quality relationships with fewer lifetime partners--something that many in the bdsm realm simply are not interested in. Still, I believe that agreeing to be serially monogamous, and going 4-6 weeks without having had fluid/fluid transfer between humans, and then going together to a place like Planned Parenthood, get the results and then go for it. At least HIV, which is always deadly becomes a non-issue, and the major problematic STI's are also defined as a non-issue.



Hi subspacepilot...I concur with  most of what you said.
just a few things I differ on ... an intact hymen is by no certain means a "certification"--the hymen does not always tear, and so if someone thinks that the hymen is a surefire way to tell, they would be mistaken.

You are incorrect that clinics will only test for HIV.  That is simply not the case, and it varies from clinic to clinic--jurisdiction to jurisdiction.  Different clinics cater to different clientele, have varying levels of local, state, federal and private funding, and offer different services accordingly.  MANY public health clinics do offer much more comprehensive STD testing You simply have to just ask for it--there are some clinics that are strictly funded to do HIV testing, but many public health centers can  and do a lot more. 

There are a number of non-profit women's  and specialized health centers/clinics that provide extremely comprehensive testing a low to no cost--including blood tests, urine tests and pap smears (anal and vaginal)

Lastly--dental dams have improved a lot over the years.  I prefer the ones that are marketed as a sex specific toy as opposed to the medical use ones--they tend to be larger, more play-friendly, and smell/taste better than the standard medical grade dental dams.

< Message edited by hausboy -- 12/13/2011 4:47:43 PM >

(in reply to subspacepilot2)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) - 12/13/2011 4:38:25 PM   
81song


Posts: 293
Joined: 1/22/2005
Status: offline
That was great info there subspacepilot2 and you have a point as to have many people one is with.
I get tested once a year even though I have been with my girlfriend for about 4 years. Even before we had sex we both got tested. It is the times we live in and like someone said it is better to be safe then sorry. You owe it to yourself and others.

(in reply to subspacepilot2)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> certified STI free (a MOT of sexual health) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094