Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The Nature of the Lie


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Nature of the Lie Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Nature of the Lie - 12/3/2011 9:38:29 PM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline
After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is?

Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie.

To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth.

Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything.

Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt.

Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist.


From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie.

Your thoughts?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/3/2011 9:42:59 PM   
ilearn


Posts: 23
Joined: 12/5/2007
Status: offline
I always play a game with all my dates, called spot the lie. It is a popular game.
You make 4 statements.

One of them is an obvious lie, the other are things about you.

1) I love the color red.
2) I am grey and balding.
3) I was the pilot on the original mission to moon.
4) Heather Locklear is my favorite actress.


It is a nice game and the obvious lie is easy to spot. The other one is not.

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/3/2011 9:52:14 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
I got the popcorn and the tequila for this one!

~snatches some truffles from Lucy and settles in

Btw, OP, I agree with you.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/3/2011 9:55:31 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ilearn

I always play a game with all my dates, called spot the lie. It is a popular game.
You make 4 statements.

One of them is an obvious lie, the other are things about you.

1) I love the color red.
2) I am grey and balding.
3) I was the pilot on the original mission to moon.
4) Heather Locklear is my favorite actress.


It is a nice game and the obvious lie is easy to spot. The other one is not.


The other one is also obvious. So, did you wear a red flower on your way to the moon? And ditch the combover, its unbecoming of an astronaut.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to ilearn)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 1:38:33 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
I'm guessing this is in reference to the other thread you posted where you decided to change a key phrase to emphasize a point.  I'm not a participant on that thread, but I did read it. 

This is just My opinion, of course, but I didn't find your original to be intellectually honest.  You revealed what you were doing by post three, but it really should have been contained in the opening post.  In a sense, you did specifically intend to deceive, and then chose to label it satire.  A disclaimer would have been much more appropriate.  It also would have allowed your topic to be discussed, rather than the method that you presented it with.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 2:05:43 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha

After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is?

Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie.

To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth.

Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything.

Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt.

Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist.


From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie.

Your thoughts?


Just to pile on LP's post, this is no more than a cover up for your deception in that thread. Satire is only such when it is clear that its satire, either presented by a known satirist or made clear that it is satire, either explicitly or being so over the top it can not be mistaken for anything else.


And of course your first example is just silly. In that context "Blows" means "bad" and has nothing to do with forced movement of air. No one who speaks colloquial English would interpret in any other way.

Irony is also clear to the listener or it is pointless.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 4:45:05 AM   
SpanishMatMaster


Posts: 967
Joined: 9/28/2011
Status: offline
Maybe I should remark that the lie depends on what you THINK that it is true.

You have a colleague, who told you "If my wife asks, I am in the bar" but you know that he is going to visit his lover. You agree. Later, without your knowledge, he finds out that her lover is herself enjoying a BBC and goes to the bar. The wife calls the colleague: "Where is my husband?" The answer "In the bar" is still a lie, even if the man is actually indeed in the bar, because the person who says it thinks otherwise.


_____________________________

Humanist (therefore Atheist), intelligent, cultivated and very humble :)
If I don't answer you, maybe I "hid" you: PM me if you want.
“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, pause and reflect.” (Mark Twain)

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 5:10:17 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
There's posters in this thread SpanishHat doesn't have on ignore?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to SpanishMatMaster)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 7:19:26 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster

Maybe I should remark that the lie depends on what you THINK that it is true.

You have a colleague, who told you "If my wife asks, I am in the bar" but you know that he is going to visit his lover. You agree. Later, without your knowledge, he finds out that her lover is herself enjoying a BBC and goes to the bar. The wife calls the colleague: "Where is my husband?" The answer "In the bar" is still a lie, even if the man is actually indeed in the bar, because the person who says it thinks otherwise.



A lie of ommission, but not what BS (pun intended) was talking about.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to SpanishMatMaster)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 7:23:46 AM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm guessing this is in reference to the other thread you posted where you decided to change a key phrase to emphasize a point.  I'm not a participant on that thread, but I did read it. 

This is just My opinion, of course, but I didn't find your original to be intellectually honest.  You revealed what you were doing by post three, but it really should have been contained in the opening post.  In a sense, you did specifically intend to deceive, and then chose to label it satire.  A disclaimer would have been much more appropriate.  It also would have allowed your topic to be discussed, rather than the method that you presented it with.



I didn't want to get in the middle of that mess either, but LadyPact just stated exactly my feelings on that thread. It was misleading. Intentionally so.
If you tell me my house is on fire, and I begin throwing my best things out in my yard to save them (breaking some in the process) telling me you were just kidding five minutes later isn't going to make me feel any better. And yes, it is still a lie.

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 8:21:25 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha

After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is?

Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie.

To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth.

Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything.

Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt.

Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist.


From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie.

Your thoughts?


My thoughts are who in their right mind would want to go to a Kenny G concert?

And I've actually met the guy in a social setting and his personality matches his music.

But more to the point, I don't know whether you are just trying to be sarcastic or don't realize that The Onion is comedy.

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 8:33:39 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha

After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is?

Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie.

To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth.

Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything.

Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt.

Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist.


From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie.

Your thoughts?


My thoughts are who in their right mind would want to go to a Kenny G concert?

And I've actually met the guy in a social setting and his personality matches his music.

But more to the point, I don't know whether you are just trying to be sarcastic or don't realize that The Onion is comedy.



Then you better reread the whole thing because you obviously missed the point. Kenny G personality matches his music? Sharp by a half tone?

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:28:47 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha

After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is?

Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie.

To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth.

Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything.

Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt.

Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist.


From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie.

Your thoughts?



Though the term means something very specific, unfortunately it`s become diluted and/or made meaningless from abuse.

I`ll go with something that can be proven,backed up and independently verified by multiple sources.

And if you`re calling someone a liar,you best be able to prove it under the same standard as above,otherwise you`re just another chump abusing the term.


Here on the boards,most people post honestly and can back up what they say or they don`t say it.They don`t want to be known as a bullshiter.

We go by the unwritten code of honor that`s backed up (usually)by not wanting to be (embarrassed by being) known as dis-honest.

For some people tho,bullshiting is part of the deal and there seems to be no shame about it.They use an Orwell-like term "fair and balanced" to describe it.








_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:46:10 AM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster

Maybe I should remark that the lie depends on what you THINK that it is true.

You have a colleague, who told you "If my wife asks, I am in the bar" but you know that he is going to visit his lover. You agree. Later, without your knowledge, he finds out that her lover is herself enjoying a BBC and goes to the bar. The wife calls the colleague: "Where is my husband?" The answer "In the bar" is still a lie, even if the man is actually indeed in the bar, because the person who says it thinks otherwise.



That seems to fit the definition above. You stated something with disregard for the truth with the intent the other person would believe it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
This is just My opinion, of course, but I didn't find your original to be intellectually honest. You revealed what you were doing by post three, but it really should have been contained in the opening post. In a sense, you did specifically intend to deceive, and then chose to label it satire.


quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx
It was misleading. Intentionally so.


Really? I actually intended people to believe in a ridiculous cartoon scenario in which Michelle Bachmann came out forcefully against interracial marriage? Is there anyone in the entire universe whom would believe such would ever be said by a legitimate candidate for President? And what about the fact that, if one were to take it as true, they'd also have to believe that interracial marriage "is not the law of the land?" I actually intended to trick people into believing that interracial marriage was illegal all over again?

For those of you that actually believed my post was true (presumably acting on this revelation by cancelling their interracial marriage plans or donating to Bachmann's campaign) my bad. I probably should have used the word "interplanetary" instead of "interracial," but then people would have accused me of intentionally inciting anxiety about space aliens ruining the sanctity of marriage.

(in reply to SpanishMatMaster)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:49:38 AM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
I'm sorry it wasn't received by all in the way you intended it to.
I suggest from now on being VERY FORWARD with the fact that you are changing text to make a point. That way we're all on the same page and can discuss the merits of your thoughts.
I actually agreed with a lot of what you said. It was the execution itself that was flawed.

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:55:35 AM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

I'm sorry it wasn't received by all in the way you intended it to.
I suggest from now on being VERY FORWARD with the fact that you are changing text to make a point. That way we're all on the same page and can discuss the merits of your thoughts.
I actually agreed with a lot of what you said. It was the execution itself that was flawed.



Point taken.

I actually feel a little sorry for those whom were duped into believing that Bachmann actually said those ridiculous things. After all, no one who actually got the intent of the post would be so hypocritical to claim it was a lie; only those who were actually duped into believing it as true would do so.

(in reply to xxblushesxx)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:56:59 AM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
I never said it was a lie. It was misleading though.

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 9:59:19 AM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

I never said it was a lie. It was misleading though.


Misleading implies it was believable to begin with.

(in reply to xxblushesxx)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 10:04:18 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Don`t sweat it Sam,everyone knew what you meant .



Coincidentally and ironically,the ones mostly calling you a liar are our worst and most shameless offenders.



So bad in fact that to be insulted by them is to be complimented.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/4/2011 10:11:45 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to BanthaSamantha)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The Nature of the Lie - 12/4/2011 12:22:57 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
This really isn't a Politics and Religion debate.  The thread it's based on was. 

In reply to xxblushesxx you said

quote:

ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha
Point taken.

I actually feel a little sorry for those whom were duped into believing that Bachmann actually said those ridiculous things. After all, no one who actually got the intent of the post would be so hypocritical to claim it was a lie; only those who were actually duped into believing it as true would do so.

I don't believe the above to be true, either.  I got the intent of the post, don't believe Myself to be a hypocrite, and still say it was untrue.  The premise that nobody would believe it doesn't change the bottom line.  You intentionally misquoted what the woman said on what you believed was your poetic license to do so to illustrate your point.

Here is My question for you.  If you decide that you have another point to illustrate, is it just as acceptable for you to go back and find one of My past statements, and change a few words around so you can come up with something that I didn't say?  Does plausibility of whatever you changed My statement to change the fact that your version isn't what I actually said?


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Nature of the Lie Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109