quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Male subs, what do you think of this scenario:
A woman who you find decently attractive uses you as nothing more than a sexual toy for her pleasure. She wants no emotional connection with you and plans to disgard you, but only after having a good time with you -- perhaps even sharing you with a few of her equally good looking friends.  You are used as an instrument of pleasure and not hurt; however, you don't get to request any pleasure for yourself.

Female subs - Same question?

A group of sorority girls in a college who have to kidnap a popular guy and use him suggestively, sensually and playfully as part of a stunt may have men lining up for the chance.  A group of frat boys looking to do the same might have trouble finding a willing participant.

I'm a femdom who loves to objectify men.  I generally only do it within the context of a relationship, but I'd be interested in exploring it with men who didn't mind no strings attached; however, I think the *fantasy* of it is more appealing to men than the reality of it.  Especially if he finds himself getting emotionally involved.

Akasha

quote:

Male subs, what do you think of this scenario:
A woman who you find decently attractive uses you as nothing more than a sexual toy for her pleasure. She wants no emotional connection with you and plans to disgard you, but only after having a good time with you -- perhaps even sharing you with a few of her equally good looking friends.  You are used as an instrument of pleasure and not hurt; however, you don't get to request any pleasure for yourself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsIncognito

I think the examples you've given are bound to skew the responses. No, I don't want to be used by a bunch of frat boys (please, I have better things to do) but I have had sessions with dominant men knowing full well I was nothing more than a play thing to be used as they saw fit then sent home. No emotional attachment. No strings. No expectations. And it was pretty damn hot. I wouldn't do it with just anyone, but with the right person it can be a mind blowing experience. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Male subs, what do you think of this scenario:
A woman who you find decently attractive uses you as nothing more than a sexual toy for her pleasure. She wants no emotional connection with you and plans to disgard you, but only after having a good time with you -- perhaps even sharing you with a few of her equally good looking friends.  You are used as an instrument of pleasure and not hurt; however, you don't get to request any pleasure for yourself.

Female subs - Same question?

A group of sorority girls in a college who have to kidnap a popular guy and use him suggestively, sensually and playfully as part of a stunt may have men lining up for the chance.  A group of frat boys looking to do the same might have trouble finding a willing participant.

I'm a femdom who loves to objectify men.  I generally only do it within the context of a relationship, but I'd be interested in exploring it with men who didn't mind no strings attached; however, I think the *fantasy* of it is more appealing to men than the reality of it.  Especially if he finds himself getting emotionally involved.

Akasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: jezabelKH

personal case study1: a boy displeased Master and myself, he was very furry, his punishment was to be shaved from head to toe. so i shaved him from head to toe and ended up with about 2 feet of hair on the floor. the rest of the night he was an object for my sheer amusement. he did not object, actually he rather got excited about it.

personal case study 2: a girl displeased Master and myself and she was a member of O/our house. her punishment was to loose all of her hair on her head. she objected, pleaded for her vanity, the hair came off anyway. the rest of the night she was placed in her usual cage. all we heard all night long was objections. she seemed to have a real hard time mentally handeling the objectification of being chattel.

i guess guys are just built a little tougher than girls, or maybe they are more withdrawn from their vanity and feelings. who knows?

quote:

ORIGINAL: jezabelKH

quote:


Akasha,

let me preface this with "when Master alows me to Top boy's or girls".

i have found that submissive and slave boy's are easier to objectify than submissive and slave girls. why is this? because i am female? because there are not enough women willing to Top or Dominate boys? hmmm.....i really don't have an answer but a therory...... in my humble opinion submissive and slave boy's are willing to generally accept any type of attention, for it is better than no attention at all.

...or maybe they are more withdrawn from their vanity and feelings. Who knows?

jezabel {KH}

Yes, and you are quite right.  We don't know.  I am just wondering why you think that males need and appreciate more attention than females, because I've known people of both genders who were very needy. 

But it IS an interesting theory that fem subs and male subs DO look at objectification in different ways.  I would think that this wouldn't be true...and maybe it is for some and not for others.  I think the jury is still out on that one.  It would be nice to hear what other fem subs think about this.

I used to moderate a pony play group years ago.  Now to my way of thinking, pony play (animal role-playing) is mostly about objectification (e.g. placing a human in a lower caste).   I became friends with one pony girl, and I asked her quite candidly if she felt objectified and humiliated.  Her answer was "no" and that she felt very proud to be a pony.  I'm not sure if males and females have a different view of animal role-play and what particular gratification each gets from that experience.  Maybe she always admired horses and didn't consider the role as less than human.


< Message edited by iliv2servher -- 6/6/2006 2:32:34 PM >

_____________________________

Dating sucks!

(in reply to jezabelKH)