willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kalikshama Thanks, but that wasn't it. I'm thinking of a proper short story where the use of statistics had led to giving one person the sole vote in a national election. Got it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_(short_story) In the future, the United States has converted to an "electronic democracy" where the computer Multivac selects a single person to answer a number of questions. Multivac will then use the answers and other data to determine what the results of an election would be, avoiding the need for an actual election to be held. The story centers around Norman Muller, the man chosen as "Voter of the Year" in 2008. Although the law requires him to accept the dubious honour, he is not sure that he wants the responsibility of representing the entire electorate, worrying that the result will be unfavorable and he will be blamed. However, after 'voting', he is very proud that the citizens of the United States had, through him, "exercised once again their free, untrammeled franchise" - a statement that is somewhat ironic as the citizens didn't actually get to vote. The idea of a computer predicting whom the electorate would vote for instead of actually holding an election was probably inspired by the UNIVAC I's correct prediction of the result of the 1952 election. I started with Stephen King, then Bradbury, then Heinlein, but it was Asimov :) So y'all don't think I'm completely off topic, I started thinking about the consequences of the stock market picking the winner, and was reminded of this. One step closer with the "Americans Elect" getting candidates on the ballot. Very easy to nominate a candidate who will be a spoiler to one of the major party candidates, ensuring the election of the other one. Fraudulent signatures had better be prosecuted and examples made, or representative democracy is in big trouble.
_____________________________
Hear the lark and harken to the barking of the dogfox, gone to ground.
|