Kedikat
Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006 Status: offline
|
I have no problem with any group having equality. Sometimes that equality, can idealogically conflict with others, but idealogy does not have to change everyday reality. In a few cases it can actually be a real change to some things. I had a fellow on my crew that was Muslim. I was fine with him taking his prayer times. And he was fine with tolerating our non Muslim ways. I do take issue of equality being something that forces me or others, to do things they prefer not to, and have no real reason to do. The concept of equality in a complex society of law, can become burdonsome and frictional, if the concept of equality is defined too broadly. It is sort of a problem for the ones who arrived later ( crudely put ). The ones there first, that created and built the society and law, are generally equal in it ( or powerful enough to have made the law and society ). As others arrive, or the formerly silent find voice, they feel unequal. Then it has to be decided, do we broaden our society and laws to make them equal? Do we say they are equal in our society, but sort of outside the norms? Often we need only apply our present laws equally, without bias. Often it is the application of laws, not the word or spirit of them that is unequal. Usually nothing more than simple acceptance of reality provides equality. It is more in heart and mind of the majority, that equality arrives. Equality is freedom to be ones self if it harms no other. Forces no other to do what they wish not to. This does not include the right of someone to not hire on the basis of race. Or things like that. That is not reality, it is idealogy. It does not allow one to presume a gay teacher, is teaching children to be gay. That is just ignorance. One persons equality ( if they know what equality means ) should never intrude on anothers.
|