WestBaySlave -> RE: The emotional side of Mastership (3/21/2012 2:06:17 PM)
|
This thread has indeed turned worthwhile! Bita's post was particularly insightful. I think while there is nearly always an emotional side to every long-term relationship, it can be hard to define. Some submissive types really do thrive on cold, less-than-a-dog treatment and seem to be living happy, satisfying lives. That very inhuman treatment is an emotional need. And even in these circumstances, I've never actually seen the D-side of it say "She has no right to feelings." Short of brain death, that's a hard one to do. Now, options or ability to act on said feelings, that's another thing... While most D/s and M/s situations have some type of love ( from what I've seen ), it's not always the defining quality of the relationship. Sometimes it's just something that grows through time and familiarity, and often even if the relationship is a sexual one, it isn't the love of eros in the literal sense. Also, most people need more than love and trust, I've found. We're all a mess of various desires, needs, and wants. Rarely will any one person be able to fulfill every single one for another person, in the exact way they are hoping. And that isn't a "we should all be polyamorous and open" statement. As for myself, I'm strictly monogamous and seek one-on-one connections. I just don't expect whatever man I settle down with to be, in the most literal sense, my everything. Even if I make a man the "god" in my life, there will be feet of clay, and some dissatisfaction at times. There have been dominant men I loved, trusted, and respected, yet I would not be theirs if they wanted, simply because we are not right for each other. Yet, I have submitted to some degree to men who I did not love, respect greatly, or trust fully, as part of the getting to know each other process and feeling each other out as D and s. Yet, I do seek a power exchange that contains both love, trust, and respect much like the OP does. But things have to start somewhere. And, while I don't like to dog-pile the OP, but it is true that "You're all doing it wrong" type of first posts usually set things off on the wrong foot. I think starting with an adversarial tone will win adversaries where friends might have been instead.
|
|
|
|