farglebargle
Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005 From: Albany, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle I already have provided reproducible, experimental evidence that the soul is -- in accordance with Christian dogma-- indivisible. Was there any question about the process? You haven't provided bupkis as far as evidence is concerned. And whether or not the soul is divisible is not at issue. The claim (and if I'm wrong about this, I'll welcome correction from any Catholics here) is that a new life begins at conception. Nothing about the soul there. Having life does not equate to having a human soul. In fact, as I recall, there was some time back a ways the notion that the embyo possessed a "vegetative soul," the fetus an "animal soul," and only later did it acquire a human soul, when it had developed enough to be a suitable vessel for God to pop one in. All rather fanciful stuff in my view, but it has the dubious advantage of making more sense than what you're peddling. K. "whether or not the soul is divisible is not at issue", is a really weird way of saying "is the entire premise behind the thread". "New Life"? There is no "New Life" The egg is alive. The sperm is alive. Life is a CONTINUUM. And since no-one questions cutting out cancer ( which is also alive ) then the ENTIRE FUCKING ISSUE IS WHAT MAKES THAT TISSUE SPECIAL. And if it's not a soul which makes it special, what the fuck does? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
_____________________________
It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show. ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים
|