|
Arturas -> RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republicans "Take Women To Dinner. They Buy Women Diamon (3/18/2012 10:00:18 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SpiritedRadiance
quote:
ORIGINAL: Arturas
You being a past abused spouse does not mean GOP men are abusing their spouses and so therefore are actually in a "war with women" even though they do things that show they have high esteem for them and care about them, as Rush and I previously explained, by marrying them Doesnt count because Gay marriage is still mostly illegal and the GOP doesnt believe in it.. so Marrying doesnt mean they esteem them it ust means its the only current legal and religiously acceptable option, raising families with them Doesnt count..because Last I checked Men cant pop out babies there for to follow ones religion, they must fuck and pop out children with women, taking them to dinner doesnt countusually believing that buying dinner means they get laid therefor possibly getting their partner pregnant and doing as their religion tells them and opening doors for them, and purchasing them gifts as Rush explained.
This insult you have for me, and I can only speak for me and not Rush, is therefore completely unjustified and I question why it was necessary to bring your past personal marrage failure followed by an attempt to group me and other GOP men in with your abusive spouse and then follow that up with a personal attack on me, especially into a political discussion, in order to prove GOP men are in a "war with women".
Are you instead in a "war against men"? That would explain much.
Im have a strong hatred for misogynists...
My absuive Ex bought me jewelry.. He also gave me the gift of 40 stitches one time.. I was just so lucky [8|]
He would buy me gifts after he beat me, he would be extra sweet and hold open doors after he beat me... He would go out of his way to be kind... After he beat me
Its classic abusive behavior.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Arturas
this is a free country and you get to pick what company you work for
Sorry Aint to free when you have mouths to feed, some times you have to take any job available when theres a 9% country wide unemployment rate and your kids are hungry
I'm not sure what this has to do with men who do these things for the right reason. I do not understand why my actions and outlook as well as most of the men is judged by you and perhaps others here based on past abuse by the men you picked in the past. You have the freedom to pick a man like me and others who do not have hidden and selfish motives for being manly or you can pick the bad boy who abuses you later down the road. Your choice it was, not mine.
On the other point, having to take the only job available to keep from starving is still a freedom. You are free to take it or not. If you are offered one, then you are not required to take it but you can and are free to stay there until something better comes around. I'm not sure what else you think you are entitled to but regardless you do not have right to control what you employer offers except by getting another job, when it is available. This is life.
P.S. If down the road you might work at a new job and it offeres paid contraceptives or whatever but drops dental for you and your children to help pay for it then you are free to decide which is better for you and your children, nobody mandates what choice you have here and nobody mandates you pay the higher premium for both coverages but likely gives you a choice and then you make the choice. That is freedom and the right to life, liberty and the pursuit (not given or entitled to) of happiness as you define happiness.
|
|
|
|
