Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over constitutionality of health care mandate


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over constitutionality of health care mandate Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 6:40:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

QED.  And the logic and fact contained therein was?



That you're evidently not tall enough for this ride.


LOL.  I am taller than you, Napoleon. And I am in possession of some pretty obvious and well known facts that you convieniently ignored in your ratpoison republican off topic non sequitur regarding Obama, which was instantly destroyed by simple fact, that it ain't Obamcare, he has nothing to do with it.      

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 6:44:05 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

DefiantBadGirl, It's not to late. If you don't like living in the United States you can always move. I hear that Cuba has a wonderful health care system.

If you can't have a discussion with the grownups, go watch the talk shows. Or perhaps the cartoons.

The average person in the U.S. has a net worth of $47,000. The average person in OMG Socialist Canada has a net worth of $97,000.

Guess why.





It hasn't been stolen yet?

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 7:06:50 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
And that, Yachtie, is the difference between doing this with the private sector verses national health care.

In Canada, it hasn't been stolen yet.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 7:06:53 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

DefiantBadGirl, It's not to late. If you don't like living in the United States you can always move. I hear that Cuba has a wonderful health care system.

If you can't have a discussion with the grownups, go watch the talk shows. Or perhaps the cartoons.

The average person in the U.S. has a net worth of $47,000. The average person in OMG Socialist Canada has a net worth of $97,000.

Guess why.





It hasn't been stolen yet?

Who are the main thieves? Big Pharma and the Health care/legal industry?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 7:27:43 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
And the solution is Universal Medicare. The US Congress says, "We're paying X for that drug, take it or leave it". Instant savings.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 7:29:50 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Here's the thing. If the USSC tosses the ACA, then they also say that the DRUG CONTROL ACT is also wrong. Which means a lot of people are going to be hurt. Prisons might have to close. Prison guards on unemployment. There's a LOT of money on the table here. So the USSC is trapped.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 7:50:27 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

Chief Justice Roberts is many thing but a fool isn't one. His court is going to punt this for 2+ years by invoking the law saying courts can't litigate on a tax until someone has paid it. Then around 2017 or 2018 SCOTUS will up hold the law if anyone bothers appealing all the way again.


Actually, they signaled the first day, Monday, that this is not the case. No punt. They are deciding this here and now and they allowed three days of arguments signalling how serious this issue is.



_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 8:41:57 AM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
The mandate is the centerpiece of this entire bill and, ironically, provides the insurance industry with some sort of stability.

If the mandate gets struck down and the rest of the bill is allowed to stand, then it will wreak havoc on the entire health care system and will completely destroy insurance providers within a couple of years. After all, if an individual cannot be denied coverage based on a certain pre-existing condition, then why would this person get insurance in the first place? Remember, there would be no penalty to pay if they choose to remain uninsured. Under this situation many people will choose to sign up for insurance coverage once there is an accident, once they get sick, or diagnosed with a complication, etc. This will lead to a scenario where insurance provider output income (money paid via claims) exceeds input income (money received via premiums), bankrupting them in the process.

This could be an even better scenario for the socialists since the system will be destroyed quicker without the mandate, where they can attempt to enact a socialist scheme once it breaks down. On the other hand, if the entire bill gets struck down, then every single person reading this will never see a single payer system in their lifetimes.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 8:55:46 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
If they strike down the mandate, it will lead us on a quicker path to Universal Healthcare, which of course, is the inevitable (since it is the only workable) path.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:05:58 AM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The average person in the U.S. has a net worth of $47,000. The average person in OMG Socialist Canada has a net worth of $97,000.



That doesn't sound right. Where did you get these numbers?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:25:27 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: provfivetine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The average person in the U.S. has a net worth of $47,000. The average person in OMG Socialist Canada has a net worth of $97,000.



That doesn't sound right. Where did you get these numbers?

quote:

The average person in the U.S. has a net worth of $47,000. The average person in OMG Socialist Canada has a net worth of $97,000.


Old numbers...here are more up to date ones.

As reported in the December/January 2012 issue of Money Sense, Canada’s average median citizen's net worth has topped the United states.

A Credit Suisse 2011 Global Report found that Canadians are now officially wealthier than Americans. The median net-worth per adult in Canada is $89,014 US, but in America, it's $52,752 US.

The median amount represents an individual with a net worth in the middle range relative to the rest of the country. However, if you look at the average net worth per adult in the two countries, you will find very different results. The average net worth of Canadians in general is $245,455 US, and in the United States, the average net worth for citizens is $248,395 US.

The reason the average figures are so much higher than the median figures is that the average figures are skewed by the extremely wealthy. The United States has 32% of the world's billionaires, so this fact alone significantly raises the overall net worth of America.


http://lsminsurance.ca/life-insurance-canada/2011/12/canadas-net-worth-tops-the-united-states

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 3/28/2012 9:26:03 AM >

(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:39:38 AM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Old numbers...here are more up to date ones.

As reported in the December/January 2012 issue of Money Sense, Canada’s average median citizen's net worth has topped the United states.

A Credit Suisse 2011 Global Report found that Canadians are now officially wealthier than Americans. The median net-worth per adult in Canada is $89,014 US, but in America, it's $52,752 US.

The median amount represents an individual with a net worth in the middle range relative to the rest of the country. However, if you look at the average net worth per adult in the two countries, you will find very different results. The average net worth of Canadians in general is $245,455 US, and in the United States, the average net worth for citizens is $248,395 US.

The reason the average figures are so much higher than the median figures is that the average figures are skewed by the extremely wealthy. The United States has 32% of the world's billionaires, so this fact alone significantly raises the overall net worth of America.


http://lsminsurance.ca/life-insurance-canada/2011/12/canadas-net-worth-tops-the-united-states


"Average median" is a strange way of measurement. There could be some statistical gimmickry at play here. I'd be interested reading up on this survey's research method (the official survey link is broken, unfortunately).

I'm not sure if the US does surveys per-adult median income. Most of those surveys, to my knowledge, calculate median household income. It would be interesting to see other studies, because this doesn't seem right.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:40:37 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Since the article both addresses that, gives other figures, and explains why, I can't imagine how your question isn't answered.

(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:47:29 AM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Since the article both addresses that, gives other figures, and explains why, I can't imagine how your question isn't answered.


It barely addresses it, though I'm sure the real survey does. Research method is very important in these types of studies, and the linked article does not elaborate on such matters. Plus the real source is what's salient, not the third party relaying tidbits.

< Message edited by provfivetine -- 3/28/2012 9:49:54 AM >

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:49:51 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Research away.

In the meantime, the problem is you just don't like what the research shows.

We'll talk again when you've got research to share.


(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:57:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Average median is perfectly acceptable since we do not know the data is symmetrical. (in fact when dealing with such clusters as household income (cuz we would ask in a range) median average would be the only acceptable number.

Average mean would be acceptable for an even number of values reasonably distributed.  Like school grades, with discrete values. 

Don't pretend to have math skills, please.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 9:57:45 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir
FR
Yeah, it MUST be selfishness. It couldn't possibly be because the feds are overstepping their boundaries again
What the government can GIVE you, they can TAKE AWAY from you.

So if the government provided someone without heathcare insurance ...healthcare services...that,would be worse that getting no care at all?
Please explain how healing someone is evil or bad government or not good somehow?


You know damn well this legislation isn't about health care services directly. It's about paying for health care services.

quote:

Oh, no, it's not. They all involved commerce. There was no doubt that was what regulated was commerce. And here you're regulating somebody who isn't covered.

By the way, I don't agree with you that the relevant market here is health care. You're not regulating health care. You're regulating insurance. It's the insurance market that you're addressing and you're saying that some people who are not in it must be in it and that's — that's difference from regulating in any manner commerce that already exists out there. - Justice Scalia



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 10:02:01 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: provfivetine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Old numbers...here are more up to date ones.

As reported in the December/January 2012 issue of Money Sense, Canada’s average median citizen's net worth has topped the United states.

A Credit Suisse 2011 Global Report found that Canadians are now officially wealthier than Americans. The median net-worth per adult in Canada is $89,014 US, but in America, it's $52,752 US.

The median amount represents an individual with a net worth in the middle range relative to the rest of the country. However, if you look at the average net worth per adult in the two countries, you will find very different results. The average net worth of Canadians in general is $245,455 US, and in the United States, the average net worth for citizens is $248,395 US.

The reason the average figures are so much higher than the median figures is that the average figures are skewed by the extremely wealthy. The United States has 32% of the world's billionaires, so this fact alone significantly raises the overall net worth of America.


http://lsminsurance.ca/life-insurance-canada/2011/12/canadas-net-worth-tops-the-united-states


"Average median" is a strange way of measurement. There could be some statistical gimmickry at play here. I'd be interested reading up on this survey's research method (the official survey link is broken, unfortunately).

I'm not sure if the US does surveys per-adult median income. Most of those surveys, to my knowledge, calculate median household income. It would be interesting to see other studies, because this doesn't seem right.

Translation: It goes against your pre concieved notions, therefore it must be untrue. Am I close?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 10:08:05 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Going by past threads, research has never been his "thing."

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over cons... - 3/28/2012 10:12:12 AM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Research away.

In the meantime, the problem is you just don't like what the research shows.

We'll talk again when you've got research to share.



Ah. Was mixing up your first post on average with the clarification on median. Good thing I'm not in stats class. Coffee time for me.

Anyways, the real study is here.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: MSNBC: Supreme Court expresses skepticism over constitutionality of health care mandate Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094