quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69

Does a Financial Mistress need to be physically stronger than her slave in order to dominate him and make him pay tribute to her or is it just about mind control?

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69

Does a Financial Mistress need to be physically stronger than her slave in order to dominate him and make him pay tribute to her or is it just about mind control?

Spidey,

Would that question be better phrased as something like, "How do femdoms get past the fact that women are generally physically weaker than men, in order to feel their sense of dominance over them?"

That, in fact, was a question that I myself asked, once. I used to wonder about such things myself. Very fundamental things like that, that is. (Though, your own question brings in the more specific subjects of financial dommes and tributes - and I admit I don't really understand why.)

The bottom line is that I can't see where you're coming from here. I can't fathom what it is that you want to find out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69

Does a Financial Mistress need to be physically stronger than her slave in order to dominate him and make him pay tribute to her or is it just about mind control?

Spidey,

Would that question be better phrased as something like, "How do femdoms get past the fact that women are generally physically weaker than men, in order to feel their sense of dominance over them?"

That, in fact, was a question that I myself asked, once. I used to wonder about such things myself. Very fundamental things like that, that is. (Though, your own question brings in the more specific subjects of financial dommes and tributes - and I admit I don't really understand why.)

The bottom line is that I can't see where you're coming from here. I can't fathom what it is that you want to find out.

No. They would see the word "physically" and then say i have a fetish for getting my butt kicked by fetish women and that I've started the same thread again.

I wanted to know that do Financial Mistresses use mind control to dominate their slaves and make them pay tributes or they have to be physically stronger than them. That's all I wanted to know.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Spidey,

I have just an inkling that you might be making one of the most fundamental errors of all. This is that it isn't so much about her ability to dominate you as your ability and desire to submit to her.


Yeah, you're right. That didn't cross my mind.

(in reply to PeonForHer)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta



I think it was an ignorant question. FinDom is its own thing. If the Domme has to physically subdue the sub/slave to get the money, it falls into the extortion and takedown fantasies. If the Domme has to mentally manipulate the sub/slave to get the money, it is more of a blackmail or mental domination thing. The FinSub fetish is its own and focused on the transaction and what follows that rather than how the situation is established. Mostly the FinDom/me say "I know exactly what to do with your money, paypiggie" and the FinSub says "oh thank gawd where have you been all my life" and hands over the dough, then the FinDom/me says "Is that the best you can do, pig?" and the Finsub says "No GOddess, sorry Goddess" and forks more money over. The FinSub enjoys handing over his wallet and cums a little in his pants everytime he gives the FinDom/me money, and vice-versa, the FinDom/me enjoys taking it. The only "should" about FinDomination is that everyone has their own little twisted fun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69



Yeah, you're right. That didn't cross my mind.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69



Yeah, you're right. That didn't cross my mind.

For me, anyway, the ramifications of realising that took quite a lot of dealing with, I recall.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta

I think it was an ignorant question. FinDom is its own thing. If the Domme has to physically subdue the sub/slave to get the money, it falls into the extortion and takedown fantasies. If the Domme has to mentally manipulate the sub/slave to get the money, it is more of a blackmail or mental domination thing. The FinSub fetish is its own and focused on the transaction and what follows that rather than how the situation is established. Mostly the FinDom/me say "I know exactly what to do with your money, paypiggie" and the FinSub says "oh thank gawd where have you been all my life" and hands over the dough, then the FinDom/me says "Is that the best you can do, pig?" and the Finsub says "No GOddess, sorry Goddess" and forks more money over. The FinSub enjoys handing over his wallet and cums a little in his pants everytime he gives the FinDom/me money, and vice-versa, the FinDom/me enjoys taking it. The only "should" about FinDomination is that everyone has their own little twisted fun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus
You werent too quick on the uptake back then, were you, Darling?

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69

Good answer. This is what you should have said in the first place instead of verbally attacking me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus
You werent too quick on the uptake back then, were you, Darling?

No, I wasn't really, I suppose. But, in fairness to myself, communication was difficult. Most people weren't too quick on the uptake in grasping what I was asking, either. ;-)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

You werent too quick on the uptake back then, were you, Darling? You made up for it, anyway.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FriendlyMuppet

We scientists here at the Financial Domination Academy just completed a quantitative analysis involving fudiciary response algorithms and determined that using the following formula:

f(x)=a_0+∑_(n=1)^∞▒(a_n cos⁡〖nπx/L〗+b_n sin⁡〖nπx/L〗 )

Where x = length of service to the dominatrix, a = experience of the dominant in extracting income from said submissive, and L = an additive expression of how long the service has been in place, specifically determining whether or not the submissive has figured out said dominant is or is not full of shit, using the following equation for determination:

(1+x)^n=1+nx/1!+(n(n-1) x^2)/2!+⋯

Of course if n approaches infinity, meaning slave has paid more money than he or she can afford, then you might have to include Placque’s Constant. For that, we’d have to use quantum expressions involving Schroedinger’s Cat, and you know how much that cat gets annoyed when its not fed. Plus, who can ever tell if he’s really in or not in the box anyway?

Now, if Schroedinger's Cat is not yet annoyed, then all you have to do is then weigh the said dominant versus the said submissive, and if the number approaches +- 3.217 ohms, then the dominant does not have be stronger. If it does not approach said number, then she does.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Well, all men are wankers, arent they? And i couldnt be asexual with you for giant champagne diamonds, its not how it works, is it? You either come across like a person, or you dont.