RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman

RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

dink22 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:32:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men... That just makes no sense at all! It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it. Vulnerable men... now that is just funny! Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote.

MissAsylum -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:32:11 PM)
I just like seeing the ill informed dance. and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section. i knew you couldn't resist me. lol quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer FR I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter?

PeonForHer -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:32:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Twenty9male I think men are the victims when it comes to sex, all the money it costs, yet no one to stand up for them. If there were no worker base there would be no customers But there might be a lot more rapists.

Twenty9male -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:33:05 PM)
Might be might not be

MissAsylum -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:34:44 PM)
No, that is the end of your story. If you weren't engaging in selective reading- it explains what sexual acts it is referring to. You know, "as used in this section". and people with common sense, abide by the law. quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: MissAsylum sex worker is the correct term. such as strippers who get naked for money (and the good ones at least) don't do sex on the side. yes, i work in the sex industry, and i have no qualms about it. so do people who sell sex toys, but i guess they aren't prostitutes- despite the fact that they give indirect pleasure for money. i don't spread my legs, widen my hand, or open my mouth for anybody other than my partner. and since you need a refresher on what prostitution is: "Prostitution consists of knowingly engaging in or offering to engage in a sexual act for hire. As used in this section "sexual act" means sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, masturbation of another, anal intercourse or the causing of penetration to any extent and with any object of the genital or anal opening of another, whether or not there is any emission. Whoever commits prostitution is guilty of a petty misdemeanor, unless such crime is a second or subsequent conviction, in which case such person is guilty of a misdemeanor." http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/prostitution/ I do none of that. Right. "Knowingly engaging in or offering to engage in a sexual act for hire." That's what you do. I need no refresher course. Often it will involve intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio or masturbation, but even if it doesn't, the common understanding of prostitution is that it is sex for money. People engaging in it, very commonly, try to find technicalities to say it's not prostitution. And those may work with the courts who are constricted by the literal definition of the law. But they don't work with common sense among common people. Everybody sees what it is: sex for money. End of story.

Lockit -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:34:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men... That just makes no sense at all! It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it. Vulnerable men... now that is just funny! Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote. Obviously, you didn't get what I wrote.

MissAsylum -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:35:59 PM)
Obviously, you didn't see that she was not talking to you. quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men... That just makes no sense at all! It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it. Vulnerable men... now that is just funny! Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote. Obviously, you didn't get what I wrote.

PeonForHer -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:37:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissAsylum I just like seeing the ill informed dance. and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section. i knew you couldn't resist me. lol quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer FR I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter? Sigh, Well, I'll stand by my words. It seems to me that what these debates boil down to - aside from legal matters, that is - is a covert disparaging of prostitution, no matter what each side says. One side wants to defend against the insult, the other wants the first to own the insult. Do people really, really believe that there's nothing wrong with prostitution? I mean, have they hoovered every last vestige of that old Victorian morality out of their systems?

dink22 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:38:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit ROFL... Vulnerable men being taken advantage of???? So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want? Helpless, vulnerable men... That just makes no sense at all! It's more like men helping themselves to what they want and being willing to fork over some dough for it. Stop blaming the women... if there were no customer base, the women wouldn't be doing it. Vulnerable men... now that is just funny! Obviously, you haven't read what I wrote. Obviously, you didn't get what I wrote. How can I?? You didn't read what I wrote. Try. Where did I say ANYTHING that could prompt a statement like, "So vulnerable they cannot resist paying someone to give them something they want?" HUH??? Where did you get that??? What are you on?!

MissAsylum -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:41:58 PM)
What i think is wrong with prostitution....many people aren't doing it in a safe manner and violence has happened- off the top of my head. other than that- hey, we all got a job to do. quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: MissAsylum I just like seeing the ill informed dance. and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section. i knew you couldn't resist me. lol quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer FR I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter? Sigh, Well, I'll stand by my words. It seems to me that what these debates boil down to - aside from legal matters, that is - is a covert disparaging of prostitution, no matter what each side says. One side wants to defend against the insult, the other wants the first to own the insult. Do people really, really believe that there's nothing wrong with prostitution? I mean, have they hoovered every last vestige of that old Victorian morality out of their systems?

Lockit -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:42:38 PM)
dink22, what are you on? I wasn't even responding to you.

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:42:50 PM)
Jesus Fried Chicken - no shame in Pro Dommes. Provided they are really Pro Dommes that really deliver. People get scammed all the time by other people. I have great respect for all "true" Pro Dommes out there...compared to the internet scammers pretending to be. (figure out the difference yet?)....

dink22 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:44:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit dink22, what are you on? I wasn't even responding to you. You're right. I apologize.

dink22 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:51:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: MissAsylum I just like seeing the ill informed dance. and i do believe I saw your luscious abs in my "users who have recently search for your profile" section. i knew you couldn't resist me. lol quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer FR I was just thinking: if everyone is in agreement (as it appears) with the propositions that a) there's nothing wrong with being a prostitute and b) there's nothing wrong with giving sexual favours (howsoever defined) in return for money - then why, exactly, are people arguing about the matter? Sigh, Well, I'll stand by my words. It seems to me that what these debates boil down to - aside from legal matters, that is - is a covert disparaging of prostitution, no matter what each side says. One side wants to defend against the insult, the other wants the first to own the insult. Do people really, really believe that there's nothing wrong with prostitution? I mean, have they hoovered every last vestige of that old Victorian morality out of their systems? I actually don't find any problem with prostitution --AT ALL-- as long as it is understood as such. I think it should be legal. It just bothers me when a supposedly "dominant" woman is "looking" for someone, then money comes into the picture. Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real?

Lockit -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 5:53:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit dink22, what are you on? I wasn't even responding to you. You're right. I apologize. Thank you. I've been known to make a few mistakes here on the boards myself and that was kind of you.

PeonForHer -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 6:04:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 I actually don't find any problem with prostitution --AT ALL-- as long as it is understood as such. I think it should be legal. It just bothers me when a supposedly "dominant" woman is "looking" for someone, then money comes into the picture. Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real? I'm beginning to believe that the problem we have with this kind of argument (and it occurs very, very frequently on these boards) is that women hate to be called 'money-grabbers' about as much as men hate to be called 'do-me subs', 'wankers', or similar. If you bring the aspect of money-grabbing onto these boards, you'll be talking about one type of woman to a different type. The second type, the non-money grabbers, are always going to feel tarred by the same brush (rightly or wrongly). It's a different world and they don't deserve to have it shoved at them.

LadyPact -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 6:24:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real? Do you even have a clue of how many Dominant females on this thread do not engage in pro sessions, financial, or any of the other stuff that you are railing about?

dink22 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 6:59:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real? Do you even have a clue of how many Dominant females on this thread do not engage in pro sessions, financial, or any of the other stuff that you are railing about? Actually, you're quite right. There ARE dominant females here. REAL ones, who want a REAL relationship and/or live the lifestyle for real. And I see my original comments, while driven by my experience, may have had the tendency to paint ALL supposed "dominant females" with the same brush, which was kind of insulting. I assure you that was not my intention, LadyPact. If what I said was offensive to either you, or Lockit, who I know are the real deal, I am sorry.

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 7:19:41 PM)
dink22, If my experiences with sub/slave women had been limited to only CM or online LD stuff. I'd be saying and thinking a lot of negative things about subs/slaves in general. Just like you have not so good things to say about many of these so called Dommes. Seriously, this online (LD) madness is exceptionally/radically different compared to world outside the room where the computer is at. Also, yeah there are some negative snarky remarks which get dished out on the message boards here. Probally other places. This comes with the territory of engaging in group conversations with a bunch of strangers... even more so with the diverse personalities, views and opinions.

MissAsylum -> RE: Just got rejected by a dominant woman (5/16/2012 7:49:44 PM)
Something I have to point out to you here: what is real to some, is not real to others. That term is very subjective. quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: dink22 Is the femdom thing THAT hopeless?? Is nothing about it real? Do you even have a clue of how many Dominant females on this thread do not engage in pro sessions, financial, or any of the other stuff that you are railing about? Actually, you're quite right. There ARE dominant females here. REAL ones, who want a REAL relationship and/or live the lifestyle for real. And I see my original comments, while driven by my experience, may have had the tendency to paint ALL supposed "dominant females" with the same brush, which was kind of insulting. I assure you that was not my intention, LadyPact. If what I said was offensive to either you, or Lockit, who I know are the real deal, I am sorry.

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 [7] 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875