99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


kalikshama -> 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 8:20:15 AM)

New research examining parabens found in cancerous human breast tissue points the finger at antiperspirants and other cosmetics for increasing your risk of breast cancer.

The research, which is also reviewed in an editorial published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology, looked at where breast tumors were appearing, and determined that higher concentrations of parabens were found in the upper quadrants of the breast and axillary area, where antiperspirants are usually appliedii.

Parabens are chemicals that serve as preservatives in antiperspirants and many cosmetics, as well as sun lotions. Previous studies have shown that all parabens have estrogenic activity in human breast cancer cells.

Another component of antiperspirants, aluminum chloride, has been found to act similarly to the way oncogenes work to provide molecular transformations in cancer cells. According to the authors of the editorial review, the research shows "signals of concern that such compounds are not as safe as previously generally considered, and further research is warranted."

Furthermore:

"The data from this latest study, the most extensive examination of parabens in human breast so far published, confirms previous work and raises a number of questions on the entire parabens, personal care product and human health debate, particularly relating to the source and toxicological significance of the paraben esters."

Ninety-nine Percent of Breast Cancer Tissue Samples Contain Parabens

The featured study by Barr et.al. discovered one or more paraben esters in 99 percent of the 160 tissue samples collected from 40 mastectomiesiii. In 60 percent of the samples, all five paraben esters were present. There were no correlations between paraben concentrations and age, length of breast feeding, tumor location, or tumor estrogen receptor content. The median values in nanograms per tissue for the five chemicals were:
n-propylparaben 16.8
methylparaben 16.6
n-butylparaben 5.8
ethylparaben 3.4
isobutylparaben 2.1

While antiperspirants are a common source of parabens, the authors note that the source of the parabens cannot be established, and that 7 of the 40 patients reportedly never used deodorants or antiperspirants in their lifetime. What this tells us is that parabens, regardless of the source, can bioaccumulate in breast tissue.

And the sources are many. Parabens can be found in a wide variety of personal care products, cosmetics, as well as drugs. That said, it appears the dermal route is the most significant form of exposure. In the featured editorial, Philip Harvey and David Everett explain why:

"... [T]he dermal route of exposure is considered more plausible when intact esters are detected, and other authors reporting human exposures and body fluid concentrations of paraben esters consider cosmetics of some form or another as the likely sources... This is because the metabolic esterase activity of the gut and liver (relevant to oral exposure) is considered to greatly exceed that of the skin, and oral exposures would result in rapid liver metabolism of the esters to produce the common metabolite p-hydroxybenzoic acid... Paraben esters typically used in cosmetics pass through human skin in vitro/ex vivo, and Ishiwatrai et.al. (2007) has shown persistence of unmetabolized methylparaben in the skin"

Safety of Parabens has NEVER Been Established...

As incredible as it sounds, despite the fact that parabens are used in such a wide variety of products, the toxicology of these chemicals has barely been investigated. There is a complete lack of modern toxicology studies on these ingredients, and according to the featured review, not a single study on the chemicals' carcinogenity follow acceptable regulatory standard carcinogenity study protocols.

The authors point out that one rat study from 1956 is still used as "the pivotal evaluation upon which human safety is judged!"

"This may be acceptable for certain chemicals for which there is limited human exposure but not for chemicals such as parabens for which such a large population is exposed, and which show significant tissue concentrations," they write.

Furthermore, virtually all toxicology studies are based on the oral route of exposure, which means that risk assessment, according to Harvey and Everett, is "largely based on assumption, opinion and the technical regulatory instrument of GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe)."

The Estrogenic Activity of Parabens

Estrogens, whether synthetic or natural are a primary risk factor for breast cancer. Approximately 20 different studies have established that parabens have estrogenic activity, which makes them relevant when it comes to estrogen-sensitive cancers. A common excuse used to defend the absence of toxicological studies is that parabens are weak in terms of potency. For example, propylparaben and butylparaben are approximately 30,000 and 10,000 less potent than estradiol, respectively.

"However, estradiol occurs in breast tissue in the pictogram per gram of tissue range... but the results reported by Barr et.al. [the featured study] show tissue concentrations of parabens, in the worst cases, in the microgram per gram of breast tissue range, which is one million-fold higher than that of estradiol. Clearly, the magnitude of exposure would seem to more than compensate for the reduction in potency," Harvey and Everett write.

But that's not all. A 2011 study reported that methylparaben promotes cell cycling and makes human breast cells more resistant to apoptosis, which, according to the authors can provide the molecular basis for malignant tumor proliferation. Harvey and Everett also cite another study from 2007, which found that propylparaben and butylparaben cause detectable DNA damage.

Rise in Breast Cancer Likely Linked to Chemical Exposures

Harvey and Everett point out that the hypothesis that chemicals in personal care products might be harmful to your health and contribute to breast cancer has a basis in two key observations:

1. Breast cancer rates have increased in recent decades, which correlates with many lifestyle factors that have undergone significant change during that same time, such as diet, obesity, and use of personal care products containing untested chemicals

2. Tumors are disproportionately located in the upper, outer quadrant of the breast, and more tumors are found in the left breast than the right, suggesting it may be related to products applied topically to those areas (most people are right-handed, which could make you a bit more heavy-handed when applying products under your left arm than your right)

In my view, one of the key observations by Harvey and Everett is that:

"The tenet that there "is no evidence that personal care products (antiperspirants or deodorants) are related to breast cancer" is technically correct, but only because studies have not been conducted to investigate any relationships. Such arguments provide false assurance by masking the inadequacies of empirical evidence and knowledge."

Aluminum—Another Cancer-Promoting Ingredient in Antiperspirants

Antiperspirants work by clogging, closing, or blocking the pores that release sweat under your arms—with the active ingredient being aluminum. (If you are using a deodorant-only product it is unlikely to contain aluminum but might contain other chemicals that could be a concern, such as parabens.) Not only does this block one of your body's routes for detoxification (releasing toxins via your underarm sweat), but it raises concerns about where these metals are going once you roll them (or spray them) on.

Like parabens, aluminum salts can also mimic estrogen, and, just like the featured study, previous research has shown that aluminum is also absorbed and deposited into breast tissueiv. The researchers suggested raised levels of aluminum could even be used as a biomarker for identification of women at increased risk of developing breast cancer.

Aluminum salts can account for 25 percent of the volume of some antiperspirants, and a review of the common sources of aluminum exposure for humans found that antiperspirant use can significantly increase the amount of aluminum absorbed by your body. According to the review, after a single underarm application of antiperspirant, about .012 percent of the aluminum may be absorbedv. This may not sound like much until you multiply it by one or more times a day for a lifetime, which adds up to massive exposure to aluminum—a poison that is not supposed to be in your body, and may be more toxic than mercury. Aside from vaccinations, your antiperspirant may be your largest source of exposure to this poisonous metal!

Be Cautious with Natural Deodorants, Too

There are many brands of chemical-free, aluminum-free deodorants on the market, and many of these are safe alternatives. "Crystal" deodorant stones, which are a popular natural deodorant alternative often used by health-conscious shoppers looking to avoid aluminum, often claim to be aluminum-free, but some actually contain a different type of compound known as an alum, the most common form being potassium alum, also known as potassium aluminum sulfate.

Potassium Alum or Ammonium Alum are natural mineral salts made up of molecules that are too large to be absorbed by your skin. They form a protective layer on your skin that inhibits the growth of odor-causing bacteria. These deodorants are recommended by many cancer treatment centers, but while this may be a better alternative to most antiperspirants and deodorants on the market, it is not completely aluminum-free. Also remember to check the remaining ingredients, keeping a watchful eye out for parabens.

For the last few decades I have not used antiperspirants or deodorants--even natural ones. I noticed that they would cause a yellow stain in the armpit of my shirts. At first I thought the stain was due to my sweat but I quickly realized it was the chemicals in the antiperspirants. I routinely substitute soap and water in my armpits and that seems to work. Although last year I noticed that if I sunbathe my axilla regularly, the UV light actually sterilized my armpits in addition to raising my levels of vitamin D. There is no odor even without using soap and water. Essentially you tan your armpits. The effect is not long lasting and the bacteria repopulate in a day or so unless you expose your armpits to sunlight.

What Can You Do to Prevent Breast Cancer?

Aside from skin cancer, breast cancer is the most common cancer among U.S. women. Unfortunately, while the American Cancer Society widely encourages women to get mammograms, they do not do nearly enough to spread the word about the many ways women can help prevent breast cancer in the first place. The following lifestyle strategies will help to lower your risk of breast cancer:

- Radically reduce your sugar/fructose intake. Normalizing your insulin levels by avoiding sugar and fructose is one of the most powerful physical actions you can take to lower your risk of cancer. Unfortunately, very few oncologists appreciate or apply this knowledge today. The Cancer Centers of America is one of the few exceptions, where strict dietary measures are included in their cancer treatment program. Fructose is especially dangerous, as research shows it actually speeds up cancer growth.
Optimize your vitamin D level. Ideally it should be over 50 ng/ml, but levels from 70-100 ng/ml will radically reduce your cancer risk. Safe sun exposure is the most effective way to increase your levels, followed by safe tanning beds and then oral vitamin D3 supplementation as a last resort if no other option is available.

- Maintain a healthy body weight. This will come naturally when you begin eating right for your nutritional type and exercising using high-intensity burst-type activities, which are part of my Peak Fitness program. It's important to lose excess weight because estrogen is produced in fat tissue.

- Get plenty of high quality animal-based omega-3 fats, such as those from krill oil. Omega-3 deficiency is a common underlying factor for cancer.

- Avoid drinking alcohol, or limit your drinks to one a day for women.

- Breastfeed exclusively for up to six months. Research shows this will reduce your breast cancer risk.

- Watch out for excessive iron levels. This is actually very common once women stop menstruating. The extra iron actually works as a powerful oxidant, increasing free radicals and raising your risk of cancer. So if you are a post-menopausal woman or have breast cancer you will certainly want to have your Ferritin level drawn. Ferritin is the iron transport protein and should not be above 80. If it is elevated you can simply donate your blood to reduce it.

References:
i Journal of Applied Toxicology January 12, 2012: 32(3); 219-232
ii Journal of Applied Toxicology February 1, 2012: 32(5); 305-309
iii Journal of Applied Toxicology January 12, 2012: 32(3); 219-232
iv Journal of Applied Toxicology April 2011: 31(3):262-9.
v Pharmacology and Toxicology April 2001: 88(4):159-67




kalikshama -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 8:31:39 AM)

I attempted to avoid aluminum in deodorants, but did not find any of the aluminum-free products effective. Because of my chemical sensitivities, I must avoid artificial fragrance, so have been using Almay Fragrance Free. This was widely available in Florida, but not in Massachusetts, so I've been getting it from Amazon. Before that I tried I think Secret "Unscented" which did in fact contain fragrance >_< so I returned it.

After reading the article, I was happy to see that this Almay does not contain parabens.




sophia37 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 11:42:29 AM)

Don't men use deodorant? Altho I have heard of breast cancer in men, its pretty uncommon. So why would women's deo be different than men's deo brands? I just cant understand why deodorant only affects women.




kalikshama -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 2:04:58 PM)

Good question. I'm assuming it's related to the different ways male and female bodies use estrogen and testosterone.

(links to authoritative sources within article)

http://thegoodhuman.com/2007/06/21/what-are-parabens-and-why-should-you-avoid-them/

Parabens can mimic the hormone estrogen, which is known to play a role in the development of breast cancers. Researchers have found parabens in breast tumors and believe there is a relationship between parabens and tumors. And in the July 2002 issue of the Archives of Toxicology, Dr. S. Oishi of the Department of Toxicology, Tokyo Metropolitan Research Laboratory of Public Health reported that exposure of newborn male mammals to butylparaben “adversely affects the secretion of testosterone and the function of the male reproductive system.” If a causal link between a chemical and cancer is not enough to avoid a product that can easily be avoided, I don’t know what is. There are a lot of other reports available all over the internet, but most of them are all related to reproductive health in some way or another.

The jury is still out on how and why parabens might affect development and growth of both babies and adults. But I decided a while ago to get rid of any products that have it and replace them with products that don’t. There is no harm being more careful with this kind of stuff – remember, things that were deemed safe in the past then came back to haunt us all when we were told that they actually caused all sorts of diseases. And when there are safe alternatives available, I would rather not take the chance that I or future generations develop strange reproductive problems from using a product that was avoidable in the first place.




Tantriqu -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 2:25:43 PM)

Everybody calm the f down.
Old news, disproved/downgraded lots of times.
Remember it's dose [concentration x amount over time], and parabens are only mildly active.
Also from Critical Reviews in Toxicology:

A Review of the Endocrine Activity of Parabens and Implications for Potential Risks to Human Health:
"it is biologically implausible that parabens could increase the risk of any estrogen-mediated endpoint, including effects on the male reproductive tract or breast cancer"





kalikshama -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 2:40:27 PM)

My posts above also links to an article in NCBI which has a different conclusion. I prefer to (calmly) err on the side of caution.




Duskypearls -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 4:18:58 PM)

I wonder if one of the reasons why breast cancer from chemicals/toxins occurrs more frequently in women than men is because most of that stuff is stored in fat, and women's breasts are made up mostly of fat.




littlewonder -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 4:41:10 PM)

I think I'll take my chances with my deodorants. I have a feeling Master wouldn't come within an inch of me without. [:D]




kitkat105 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 6:23:29 PM)

Parabens are not just found in deordorants, either. It's found in a lot of haircare and cosmetic products. Think shampoo, body wash, soap, mascara, liquid foundation...

People shouldn't underestimate the genetic componenent to breast cancer. I think it is a much higher risk factor than anything you put on the outside of your skin. Think mother, sisters, grandmother, aunties. Also remember, some genetic cancers are in the same 'familial' groups as others (ie. son's of women with breast cancer may develop pancreatic or prostate cancers).

Be sensible with what you put in or on your body. Monthly self breast checks. Mammograms when you can get them.





littlewonder -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 7:12:30 PM)

It seems most people I've known with breast cancer, it was genetic. Usually their mother or grandmother or other family member had it. I've been lucky in that regard in that it doesn't run in my family. Unlucky that just about everything else does.




kitkat105 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/3/2012 10:01:30 PM)

And I have also looked after men who have breast cancer resulting in radical mastectomies with axillary clearences. So gender doesn't always play a role.




outhere69 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/4/2012 4:24:23 PM)

To prove that it's causal (not coincidental) they'd need to sample breast tissue from non-cancer patients to provide a control. Gonna be hard to persuade folks to volunteer for that!

I've seen that women have a much higher incidence simply due to our hormones

As an aside, I always take things like this with a grain of salt, since there have been so many reports of single studies with inadequate controls. Remember how aluminum was supposed to be the cause of Alzheimer's? Tons of folks went out and bought enamel, copper, and stainless steel cookware.




Iamsemisweet -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/4/2012 8:57:26 PM)

My sister got breast cancer. Neither my mother, my grandmothers, my aunts, or my cousins have had it. She is convinced that she got it because she was exposed to a lot of agricultural chemicals when she was young.

My point is that genetics are not the only component.




kitkat105 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/4/2012 9:21:07 PM)

Oh I know that. But there is a very strong genetic predisposition towards certain cancers (pancreatic, bowel, breast, ovarian, prostate, come to mind).

The air we breath is also carcinogenic, but that doesn't mean we all get lung cancer either.




outhere69 -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/5/2012 3:42:44 PM)

Iamsemisweet--

I've wondered about ag chemicals too. My mother was in a cluster of 5 women with breast cancer, all with children, all relatively young (30s), all in the same ag township. We used to have the crop dusters overfly the house, spraying all the while. If it rained hard enough, most people's fields flooded, which also washed the pesticides into the wells.

This was back in the '60s, and my mother is the only survivor.




Iamsemisweet -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/5/2012 5:14:08 PM)

It wouldn't surprise me at all if ag chemicals caused my sister's cancer. They used to spray DDT (and god knows what else) around like water on my grandparent's ranch. No joke.




MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/9/2012 12:39:57 AM)

100% of breast cancer also contained this everyday chemical:

Hydrogen Hydroxide.

Facts without context are less than useless. From one of the articles mentioned (Journal of Applied Toxicology January 12, 2012)

"No correlations were found between paraben concentrations and age of patient (37–91 years), length of breast feeding (0–23 months), tumour location or tumour oestrogen receptor content."

Emphasis mine.




MercTech -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/10/2012 9:33:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Duskypearls

I wonder if one of the reasons why breast cancer from chemicals/toxins occurrs more frequently in women than men is because most of that stuff is stored in fat, and women's breasts are made up mostly of fat.


Now I'm thinking.... breast cancer in woman, prostate cancer in men.

Whereas prostate cancer can be directly linked to certain chemical exposures, it isn't always the case.
I have to wonder if breast cancer isn't similar with a direct link to certain lipid soluble toxins but not always the cause.

Just ruminating... time to go google and see if anyone has actually looked at that.




Muttling -> RE: 99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical (NOT Aluminum) (6/10/2012 6:21:36 PM)

Be cautious about the jumps you make on materials that were simply detected in breast tissue. Breasts are largely made of fat tissues and these tissues accumulate a variety of organic compounds (not organic as nature stuff, but organic as being molecules made of complex rings of carbon atoms.) A single and very tiny exposure to dioxin (which everyone over 30 has been exposed to) is likely to show up in breast tissue, but not be at a harmful level.

NOW......

While simple detections aren't that important in breast tissue, exposure to organic contaminants will often concentrate in the breasts and breast tissue is a good way to evaluate exposure to a LOT of contaminants. IMO, this is the reason why breast cancer is the most prevalent form of cancer.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875