tj444
Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Winterapple And I don't suppose one reason the buyer went along with the recommended vet was because she couldn't imagine that the Romney's would associate with people who would try and sell a drugged up injured horse. She might have heard they what clean living Mormons they are. The horse was injured. The Romney's profited from it's sale, they settled with the buyer out of court. The ethics of selling a injured horse even with full disclosure is dodgy. If she was as ignorant about what happened when the horse left her barn as her apologist would have her be that still doesn't excuse her carelessness about the horses fate. And again if you're old man has a itch to be president you might want to dot every i and cross every t. Her thinking was any quicker than the buyers. And there's another peek at Willard and Ann behind closed doors. Neither of them is especially bright. One of the houses I bought several years ago was misrepresented to me. I sued both the previous owners and the realtor in the lawsuit. I didnt know if the previous owners were aware of the misrepresentation or not but the way lawsuits are done is you sue everyone you can and let a Judge sort out who is responsible and for how much.. According to this article, Ann Romney was dropped from the lawsuit before it was settled out of court.. That would not have happened if there was any wrongdoing on her part.. And the horse was at a horse farm in CA, Ms Romeny lives in Utah.. so she was an absentee owner located far away and likely not aware what was going on with the horse, the trainer, the vet and the buyer.. And from this article, the buyer trusted the trainer (she kept the horse at the trainers farm) and it wasnt trusting the Romney name that she seemed to rely on, imo.. "In 2010, a San Diego woman sued the trainer, his wife and Mrs. Romney for fraud, claiming that the severity of a foot defect in a horse she bought from Mrs. Romney for $125,000 had been concealed. The case raised questions about whether the Ebelings, who acted as sales agents, intentionally covered up the animal's condition, and if so, whether Mrs. Romney, a largely absentee owner, knew. Lawyers for Mrs. Romney and the Ebelings argued that the buyer was aware of the defect, a condition disclosed by a veterinarian who conducted a prepurchase exam, and denied any effort to deceive her. They pointed out that she continued to ride the horse, named Super Hit, for more than a year after the purchase in 2008. Last September, on the eve of a jury trial, Mrs. Romney was dropped from the lawsuit before it was settled out of court, according to the Romney campaign." http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/us/in-rarefied-sport-a-view-of-the-romneys-world-637804/
_____________________________
As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”
|