RE: George Zimmerman Update... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Edwynn -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 12:18:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Thank you for trying to encourage civility.

Sorry misdirected this post it was suppossed to be directed to LadyPact



But anyway, I think you are trying to get it through my thick head that you are not claiming that Martin had no right to defend himself.

We disagree on details, maybe.



No I am tring to get it through to you that both were convenced that they were only defending themselves.


Pardon me for being 'old school' here, but back in the day an attacker did not have the 'right' of self defense.

Back in the day, when I finally figured out that running wasn't going to do me any good (I was too slow), I brought the situation to the fore when being pursued (fun neighborhood, that was). Martin might or might not have undertaken the same recourse.

We don't know exactly what transpired other than that it was clearly Zimmerman who caused the confrontation, regardless of who made the first move or spoke the first word (once Zimmerman had closed and confined the situation to being within striking distance), and that the person who was being pursued in that instance is now dead.

Even IF we wish to assume that Martin initiated a response to someone whom any normal person would consider as intending harm by his actions, as Zimmerman was, I would have been shot at least ten times, and thousands of kids defending themselves would be shot on a daily basis by such 'standards' of "attackers' right of self defense" being proposed here.






lovmuffin -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 12:55:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

It was for the consumption of hanity viewers.....the mouth-breathers......that`s it.


And as you can see from the general reaction......no one bought it .....if anything....folks have lost any possible sympathy for George.



And trying this case in the media after all the whining about the media is a bit more than disingenuous.



And if helping George`s case was the purpose......chulk up another fail for team-zim.




You and all the others and anti gun types as well who rushed to judgment didn't buy it because you don't want to. If TM hadn't punched Zimmy in the nose we wouldn't be having this discussion. TM was culpable in his death. Save it for when Zimmy walks, you can scream about it then.




SilverMark -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 1:07:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

It was for the consumption of hanity viewers.....the mouth-breathers......that`s it.


And as you can see from the general reaction......no one bought it .....if anything....folks have lost any possible sympathy for George.



And trying this case in the media after all the whining about the media is a bit more than disingenuous.



And if helping George`s case was the purpose......chulk up another fail for team-zim.




You and all the others and anti gun types as well who rushed to judgment didn't buy it because you don't want to. If TM hadn't punched Zimmy in the nose we wouldn't be having this discussion. TM was culpable in his death. Save it for when Zimmy walks, you can scream about it then.

Had Z not been a vigilante bent on violence, he wouldn't have been punched either!....CUlpability will be proven, but I doubt you will care for the outcome.




lovmuffin -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 1:36:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark



Had Z not been a vigilante bent on violence, he wouldn't have been punched either!....CUlpability will be proven, but I doubt you will care for the outcome.



And once again you are making that up. You don't know that as much as you could say that every neighborhood watch guy out there is a vigilante. You don't know he was bent on violence. He was trying to keep the neighbors from getting their houses burglarized, nothing more nothing less and then this unfortunate freak of nature event happened.




Edwynn -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:10:17 PM)


Getting too close to the edge of a cliff and then falling over it is not a freak of nature event, it is a result of simple stupidity.

Following and pursuing someone when you have no authority to do so and have been specifically advised against it and know full well that the police are on the way is not a freak of nature event, it is simple stupidity.







SilverMark -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:15:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark



Had Z not been a vigilante bent on violence, he wouldn't have been punched either!....CUlpability will be proven, but I doubt you will care for the outcome.


That whole carrying a gun thing, as a community watch person, negates your argument....sorry...

And once again you are making that up. You don't know that as much as you could say that every neighborhood watch guy out there is a vigilante. You don't know he was bent on violence. He was trying to keep the neighbors from getting their houses burglarized, nothing more nothing less and then this unfortunate freak of nature event happened.





BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:25:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

So what good does it if we do not improve?

All I've been trying to say is either, invoke change or shut the fuck up. You champions for the cause, what differnence have you made in your neighborhood?




Thugs stay away from my house and ajoining property thats what difference I have helped make.




BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:33:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
LOL!  Two people ATTACKED you?  NOW I see why you keep referring to Martin's defense as an "attack".  And actually I DID give you an alternate meaning.  Just because it doesn't suit your claims doesn't mean it wasn't there.  Also, what we have is Martin's girlfriend's paraphrasing of what Martin said...not his exact words.  He may have said something like, "I can't run any more."  Or, when he said that he may have thought he had lost Zimmerman and didn't NEED to run any more.  But the fact that DeeDee said Martin was talking real low...like he was in hiding...and the fact that in one of Zimmerman's first statements to the police he said he saw Martin emerge from the shrubs is a pretty good indication that he was hiding and so said he wasn't going to run because that would expose his location to Zimmerman again.


So suddenly Dee Dee's memory of what happened which was previously sacred truth is dubious when it hurts your conclusion. If this is to be trown out so is everything else she said.




BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:39:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Thank you for trying to encourage civility.

Sorry misdirected this post it was suppossed to be directed to LadyPact



But anyway, I think you are trying to get it through my thick head that you are not claiming that Martin had no right to defend himself.

We disagree on details, maybe.



No I am tring to get it through to you that both were convenced that they were only defending themselves.


Pardon me for being 'old school' here, but back in the day an attacker did not have the 'right' of self defense.

Back in the day, when I finally figured out that running wasn't going to do me any good (I was too slow), I brought the situation to the fore when being pursued (fun neighborhood, that was). Martin might or might not have undertaken the same recourse.

We don't know exactly what transpired other than that it was clearly Zimmerman who caused the confrontation, regardless of who made the first move or spoke the first word (once Zimmerman had closed and confined the situation to being within striking distance), and that the person who was being pursued in that instance is now dead.

Even IF we wish to assume that Martin initiated a response to someone whom any normal person would consider as intending harm by his actions, as Zimmerman was, I would have been shot at least ten times, and thousands of kids defending themselves would be shot on a daily basis by such 'standards' of "attackers' right of self defense" being proposed here.




Wrong again Zimmerman had the police on the way to do the confrontating he was observing so they both had the right to defend themselves. Keep in mind that they each had half the story if they had all the info we have it would never have happened.




BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:41:51 PM)

quote:

advised against it and know full well that the police are on the way is not a freak of nature event, it is simple stupidity.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


Getting too close to the edge of a cliff and then falling over it is not a freak of nature event, it is a result of simple stupidity.

Following and pursuing someone when you have no authority to do so and have been specifically advised against it and know full well that the police are on the way is not a freak of nature event, it is simple stupidity.





Just following not pursuing, just when did Zimmerman state he was going to detain Martin.




BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 2:44:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark



Had Z not been a vigilante bent on violence, he wouldn't have been punched either!....CUlpability will be proven, but I doubt you will care for the outcome.


That whole carrying a gun thing, as a community watch person, negates your argument....sorry...

And once again you are making that up. You don't know that as much as you could say that every neighborhood watch guy out there is a vigilante. You don't know he was bent on violence. He was trying to keep the neighbors from getting their houses burglarized, nothing more nothing less and then this unfortunate freak of nature event happened.



Sorry Mark but he was on his way back from the store. If you are going to carry you carry all the time so your argument that he was violating rules by carring is invalid




Edwynn -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 3:38:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


Just following not pursuing, just when did Zimmerman state he was going to detain Martin.


Just so we have this straight; if someone did not state that he was going to rob you or assault you before he robbed or assaulted you, then he didn't rob or assault you even if he robbed or assaulted you, if he did not proclaim such intention beforehand.

Got it.

The confrontation would not have taken place had not Zimmerman flouted the proper authorities and pursued, simple as that.






mnottertail -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 3:41:20 PM)

Eh, bullshit.  pure unadulterated bullshit.  I own more guns than any of you, and alot of you combined even.   I rarely am involved in shootouts at the local Tedeschi's, or Red Owl.

Sorry, real people rarely carry for shit like that, unless they are pure paranoid, god complexers.   Cuz people aint that worth shooting in the grocery store. 




Owner59 -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:38:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

It was for the consumption of hanity viewers.....the mouth-breathers......that`s it.


And as you can see from the general reaction......no one bought it .....if anything....folks have lost any possible sympathy for George.



And trying this case in the media after all the whining about the media is a bit more than disingenuous.



And if helping George`s case was the purpose......chulk up another fail for team-zim.




You and all the others and anti gun types as well who rushed to judgment didn't buy it because you don't want to. If TM hadn't punched Zimmy in the nose we wouldn't be having this discussion. TM was culpable in his death. Save it for when Zimmy walks, you can scream about it then.


Thanks for pointing out that this is political and idiological for you and your ilk and not about the merrits of this case.

Martin`s mom could give two shit about the gun debate.

If stupid George stayed in his car or if stupid george had listened to police or if stupid george hadn`t of been play cops-n-robers......we wouldn't be having this discussion.

And I`m not anti-gun.

I`m anti-stupid-people-with-guns.






LookieNoNookie -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:40:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
I'm anti-stupid-people-with-guns.


Good luck with that.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:42:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Eh, bullshit.  pure unadulterated bullshit.  I own more guns than any of you, and alot of you combined even.   I rarely am involved in shootouts at the local Tedeschi's, or Red Owl.

Sorry, real people rarely carry for shit like that, unless they are pure paranoid, god complexers.   Cuz people aint that worth shooting in the grocery store. 


I have 175 Billion guns.

Do you have that many?

(I actually don't tell the public about 30% of my guns...you do the numbers).




LookieNoNookie -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:44:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-07-19/news/os-george-zimmerman-interview-react-20120719_1_trayvon-martin-special-prosecutor-angela-corey-george-zimmerman

There's a lot in there, but among other things there's the fact that Zimmerman is now on the record with TWO different versions of why he exited his truck. In his report to SPD, he claims he left to get the street name, but on Hannity, he claims he left to get a house number.




I got out of my car 7 times yesterday.

2 of them were for 11 different reasons.

(4 of those 11 I question myself).




LadyPact -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:45:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Eh, bullshit.  pure unadulterated bullshit.  I own more guns than any of you, and alot of you combined even.   I rarely am involved in shootouts at the local Tedeschi's, or Red Owl.

Sorry, real people rarely carry for shit like that, unless they are pure paranoid, god complexers.   Cuz people aint that worth shooting in the grocery store. 

Ummmm.... He kind of does.

The only person around here who might have come close would have been MP when he was in charge of the armory.






Owner59 -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 4:46:27 PM)

Well......one is being delt with right now, in Florida.


Another jack-ass in Texas, won`t breath free air till he`s an old man.


You were saying?


The SYG laws are not get of of jail for free cards for stupid people.


Do you really think George`s foxnoose interview was smart?


Stupid and smart don`t mean the same things BTW......even with your Saint George.




mons -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/19/2012 5:48:54 PM)

Nosathro

I feel that Zimmerman is a rapist, when you are a victim of incest by
a family member the hardest part is making other family memeber believe what
you have told them!

I know this because I was abuse and rape as an adult by my own "brother" therapy "
has began to help my inner child and my emotional health!

But I remember more and more, I knwo something happen but I had not a clue as to what it was!

I remember it now and I am sicken by what he did, how dare anyone do this to a child, he was the older one
and should had known better!

I believe her she is not gaining anything telling about the abuse she suffer for 10 years!
Her name is not even mention!

I can say what happen to me because I did nothing wrong it was my abuser my brother who did the worse thing
when I trusted him he was my damn brother! He went through everyone of the girls in our family!

The next thing I will read about Zimmerman is he did this to others, remember they do not stop at just one!

You can find this out by reading about sexual abuser., on the web!

best regards
mons




Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875