quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: CRYPTICLXVI

Why the hell is this under "General BDSM Discussion"???

Because there isn't a "General Butthurtness" forum?

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: CRYPTICLXVI

Why the hell is this under "General BDSM Discussion"???

Because there isn't a "General Butthurtness" forum?

quote:

ORIGINAL: CRYPTICLXVI

"politics and religion"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomMeinCT

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: CRYPTICLXVI

Why the hell is this under "General BDSM Discussion"???

Because there isn't a "General Butthurtness" forum?

That's a good forum name. Perhaps we should generate a list of forum title ideas?

What about.....

Whine and (greedy) Roses

Bitch and Moan

The Whine Shop

The Complaint Depatment

CollarMe's Complaint

quote:

ORIGINAL: ultimatedomme

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

According to your profile "Slavery is not about me and what I want, but rather it is about what my owner wants. I am here to please them and my reward is a job well done." and "As I want real slavery I am open to numerous things. Ideally I hope to be owned in a more traditional sense as real property. I would love to serve in a domestic capacity and spend most of my time doing manual labor for you. I am, however, open to whatever truly pleases you."

Why are you now putting qualifiers on what they should be asking for? If you are not interested in financial domination, then don't contact them. Move on to the next profile. or maybe "gasp" go out and actually meet people in person.

Yeah this... Errr, and don't forget your wallet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: houseboyforu2

I am not sure if this is simply limited to the Michigan area, but I have seen a disturbing trend of financial dommes popping up all over the place. What troubles me more is that there is an eerie similarity to all of these profiles. I have emailed a few and gotten very similar responses. In one case two different dommes had exactly the same items on their Amazon wishlists.

I realize that this site is full of fake profiles but this seems to be taking it down another direction towards borderline fraudulent behavior. Is there anyway to report these people or at least look into further.

quote:

The REALLY OBVIOUS answer is the sub males who read the profile and/or contact the person and figure that out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomMeinCT

That's a good forum name. Perhaps we should generate a list of forum title ideas?

What about.....

Whine and (greedy) Roses

Bitch and Moan

The Whine Shop

The Complaint Depatment

CollarMe's Complaint

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

Bingo!!!

quote:

The REALLY OBVIOUS answer is the sub males who read the profile and/or contact the person and figure that out.

See, if more folks did that, we wouldn't hear so much bitching about it.. FFS, take some responsibility. It's not CMs job to screen for you all.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

and, as has been pointed out, there is nothing to stop pro/fins from not stating that they are. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, FFS!! If it seems to good to be true, chances are slanted to it BEING too good to be true.

if you haven't got the sense to not read too much into something without meeting face to face, whose fault is that?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

and, as has been pointed out, there is nothing to stop pro/fins from not stating that they are. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, FFS!! If it seems to good to be true, chances are slanted to it BEING too good to be true.

if you haven't got the sense to not read too much into something without meeting face to face, whose fault is that?

And, as stated, that's the whole idea of letting the sub males notify CM that a lifestyle profile isn't really lifestyle. If they can screen inappropriate photos --because a user notifies them that it's inappropriate-- they can screen inappropriate profiles --if a user notifies them that it's inappropriate. They would only make the final decision. You need to read my post again. It's really NOT that hard of a concept to understand.

Secondly, nobody is "reading too much" into a profile before meeting face to face. That was a projection on your part. What I said is that it's frustrating to WASTE your time, sometimes hours, trying to get that face-to-face meeting only to find out it was a scam all along. And there's a simple solution to it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ReMakeYou

While this is here, I wonder if someone can explain something to me.

Findommes almost inevitably refer to their donors as "pigs". Not any other insult. It's always some variation on pig.

Is there some source material they're all cribbing from here?

quote:

ORIGINAL: ReMakeYou

While this is here, I wonder if someone can explain something to me.

Findommes almost inevitably refer to their donors as "pigs". Not any other insult. It's always some variation on pig.

Is there some source material they're all cribbing from here?

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

and, as has been pointed out, there is nothing to stop pro/fins from not stating that they are. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, FFS!! If it seems to good to be true, chances are slanted to it BEING too good to be true.

if you haven't got the sense to not read too much into something without meeting face to face, whose fault is that?

And, as stated, that's the whole idea of letting the sub males notify CM that a lifestyle profile isn't really lifestyle. If they can screen inappropriate photos --because a user notifies them that it's inappropriate-- they can screen inappropriate profiles --if a user notifies them that it's inappropriate. They would only make the final decision. You need to read my post again. It's really NOT that hard of a concept to understand.

Secondly, nobody is "reading too much" into a profile before meeting face to face. That was a projection on your part. What I said is that it's frustrating to WASTE your time, sometimes hours, trying to get that face-to-face meeting only to find out it was a scam all along. And there's a simple solution to it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

and, as has been pointed out, there is nothing to stop pro/fins from not stating that they are. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, FFS!! If it seems to good to be true, chances are slanted to it BEING too good to be true.

if you haven't got the sense to not read too much into something without meeting face to face, whose fault is that?

And, as stated, that's the whole idea of letting the sub males notify CM that a lifestyle profile isn't really lifestyle. If they can screen inappropriate photos --because a user notifies them that it's inappropriate-- they can screen inappropriate profiles --if a user notifies them that it's inappropriate. They would only make the final decision. You need to read my post again. It's really NOT that hard of a concept to understand.

Secondly, nobody is "reading too much" into a profile before meeting face to face. That was a projection on your part. What I said is that it's frustrating to WASTE your time, sometimes hours, trying to get that face-to-face meeting only to find out it was a scam all along. And there's a simple solution to it.

What you don't seem to get is that you are trying to regulate someone else's kink. Man up...pull up your big boy pants, and just block and delete those that you have no interest in.

It's a free site ffs. What you are demanding costs man hours....if you don't like how it is run, demand a fucking refund and close your account. No skin off our nose.

Most lifestyle dommes have absolutely no use for a whiny asshat. If you don't think the lifestylers will look at your forum posts, then you underestimate them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

and, as has been pointed out, there is nothing to stop pro/fins from not stating that they are. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, FFS!! If it seems to good to be true, chances are slanted to it BEING too good to be true.

if you haven't got the sense to not read too much into something without meeting face to face, whose fault is that?

And, as stated, that's the whole idea of letting the sub males notify CM that a lifestyle profile isn't really lifestyle. If they can screen inappropriate photos --because a user notifies them that it's inappropriate-- they can screen inappropriate profiles --if a user notifies them that it's inappropriate. They would only make the final decision. You need to read my post again. It's really NOT that hard of a concept to understand.

Secondly, nobody is "reading too much" into a profile before meeting face to face. That was a projection on your part. What I said is that it's frustrating to WASTE your time, sometimes hours, trying to get that face-to-face meeting only to find out it was a scam all along. And there's a simple solution to it.

yeah, if she doesn't want to do the face to face, ignore, block and delete. Simple. And you CAN report. Whether or not the profile gets shitcanned will depend on if there enough valid reports.

Grow some balls, along with something called common sense.

Personally, I can tell within less than 5 emails if someone is actually interested in meeting (usually less than that). If you haven't developed that kind of radar, it's on you, NOT CM who, (as I said before) is not required to do your screening for you. IF you haven't got the common sense, well, what can I say? what?are you 15 yrs old?