RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


GreedyTop -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/19/2012 10:13:45 AM)

expensive here, but not BLOODY expensive... for a small fee I'd be happy to send you some ... *grins*




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/19/2012 10:18:52 AM)

Maker's Mark and Veuve Cliquot... a fine weekend, that was!




Moonhead -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/19/2012 10:47:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

expensive here, but not BLOODY expensive... for a small fee I'd be happy to send you some ... *grins*


Said fee might make up the BLOODY part, but thanks for the offer.
[;)]




Politesub53 -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/19/2012 4:58:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I think the issue is more that Thatcher set the ball rolling on that one in this country. The debate as to whether Blair and his Scots mini me destroyed as much employment with their own programme has yet to be settled, after all.


I did have a link on this, I will try and dig it out. I have mixed feelings on privatisation, some industries would have been better served in public hands, some not. The utitities, for instance, should never have been sold off. For what it is worth, I fear the coalition could do more damage than Thatcher or Blair/Brown. I have always felt these should have been run as a non profit making organisation, with any surplus after maintenance put back into R&D.

There was a good article in the independant regards private industry not being any better than public industry, as illustrated by the G4S debacle.




TheHeretic -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/19/2012 6:26:31 PM)

Jim Beam Black Label is good, and not as pricey as the Maker's Mark.

I find scotch fucking nasty. It tastes like they were burning rotten leaves in the distillery or something.




Moonhead -> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler (7/20/2012 3:29:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I think the issue is more that Thatcher set the ball rolling on that one in this country. The debate as to whether Blair and his Scots mini me destroyed as much employment with their own programme has yet to be settled, after all.


I did have a link on this, I will try and dig it out. I have mixed feelings on privatisation, some industries would have been better served in public hands, some not. The utitities, for instance, should never have been sold off. For what it is worth, I fear the coalition could do more damage than Thatcher or Blair/Brown. I have always felt these should have been run as a non profit making organisation, with any surplus after maintenance put back into R&D.

There was a good article in the independant regards private industry not being any better than public industry, as illustrated by the G4S debacle.

The other really appalling example of something not working half as well as a group of plcs as it did as a publicly subsidised state asset is British Rail that was, though carving that one up was Major rather than Thatcher, of course.
(I'm increasingly of the opinion that whenever there's a train crash now the investors in whichever company owns the rolling stock that fucked up should pay the victims' families weregild.)




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125