Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment - 9/2/2012 7:35:46 PM   
Moonlightmaddnes


Posts: 958
Joined: 6/4/2012
Status: offline 		Sadly some cancers spread like wildfires while others are slow growing. Our sheriff was a dear friend of our family. He got sick and went to the ER when he had trouble breathing, and they found lung cancer. That was in September of last year. By November he was dead and he only had one chemo but it made him so sick, him and his doctor decided to try and get him stronger before trying again.

A friend that is scary young with young children went to the ER for sudden hearing trouble and they found a mass in her lung that turned out to be cancer. Everything she read was ominous and had her up all night weeping about leaving such small children without a mother. They decided on a course of Chemo before surgery. After the chemo and surgery they did another scan that looks for cancer cells and she is completely cancer free.

I do not think it is the chemo that spreads it but it does make people very very ill, I think what determines the cancers spreading is the type of cancer. Some are horribly aggressive that a person goes from fine to dead in a terrifying amount of time while others are cured.

_____________________________

Submission is a gift that must be earned. It can be given, but never taken


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment - 9/2/2012 7:57:28 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

I'm not buying the idea that the US government tried to squash research in this area.

I did check out the Harvard research bit and found a reputable site that discussed it. However, as the site indicated, the research done in 2007 was very preliminary and involves rats. There have been many studies that appear promising in animal models and later prove to be ineffective in humans.

I'm sorry for what happened to your Mom. My Mom went through chemotherapy too. But many years later she is alive and well today.


My former roommate's Dad smoked weed every day since 1968 when he was in college. He just had to leave an executive role at a well-known bailed out bank because of the massive lymphoma in his lung. The Drs are citing his marijuana use as at least an aggravating factor.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment - 9/2/2012 7:58:04 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

(And I've been told by right wingers that countries with socialized medicine don't fund medical research)

Just to sink this fallacy:
We have 'socialised medicine' here. Funding for medical research is distributed by the National Health and Medical Research Council ( www.nhmrc.gov.au ). This system has the added advantage of ensuring that medical research is directed towards areas of actual need and health priorities rather than a private system where funding by Big Pharma tends towards areas that are expected to generate future profits.


How does a drug company generate future profits if they are funding research that aren't in areas of actual need? As an absurd example, if there is no demand for a drug that makes one's feet wider, are they going to drop buckets o' cash into research for that kind of drug? Of course not. They might do research into the next acne treatment, but that's only because they are going to be able to make money at it. That is the market talking. Government determining what gets research money is nice and all, but what isn't being funded when cancer treatments, Alzheimer's treatments, etc. are getting the funding?

Oh on the contrary, the drug industry tries with all of their heart...er greed and commits millions in advertising to 'creating' a disease or affliction. Acid reflex disease, used to be simply indigestion until the yuppies couldn't even take that much. Now they are selling us a drug we take everyday to prevent gas at all and from anything we eat.

There was actually a knee-jerk pill out there to for the 'restless leg syndrome.' There is a drug ($80-$100 month with discount) to slow the growth of Alzheimers except for one problem...you can't tell if it works.

I personally refuse to take any prescription drug unless it is an emergency. 1/2 of them are as likely to kill me. Of course, that's ok because after all...there is a profit to be made out here and that is our entire culture.

My family can sue for me after I am dead and buried. That'll show 'em.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment - 9/2/2012 8:59:00 PM   
Moonlightmaddnes


Posts: 958
Joined: 6/4/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FMRFGOPGAL

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

I'm not buying the idea that the US government tried to squash research in this area.

I did check out the Harvard research bit and found a reputable site that discussed it. However, as the site indicated, the research done in 2007 was very preliminary and involves rats. There have been many studies that appear promising in animal models and later prove to be ineffective in humans.

I'm sorry for what happened to your Mom. My Mom went through chemotherapy too. But many years later she is alive and well today.


My former roommate's Dad smoked weed every day since 1968 when he was in college. He just had to leave an executive role at a well-known bailed out bank because of the massive lymphoma in his lung. The Drs are citing his marijuana use as at least an aggravating factor.



Also in some states where people can get a script for marijuana it is widely used in cancer patients for pain. I would think if it was as aggressive at fighting cancer they would see huge improvements in patients who smoked it vs those who dont and there would be no way to squash the results with todays internet access and social media.


_____________________________

Submission is a gift that must be earned. It can be given, but never taken


(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment - 9/3/2012 4:51:43 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline 		The studies into this have been on animals, not humans, and it has been with THC, not marijuana smoke.

I would like to point out that smoking pot has some side effects that you might want to think about.

For one thing, the smoke from pot causes microscopic holes in the lining of the lungs, this has been proven repeatedly. Smoke from cigarettes does the same thing.

Marijuana smoke also contains tar, like cigarettes.

Besides, I smoked pot and still got kidney cancer.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Moonlightmaddnes)
Profile   Post #: 25
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US withholds medical advancements in cancer treatment Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063