Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead friends is OK.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead friends is OK. Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 6:00:49 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ
"squaw"

(The words for 'woman' in the three languages listed above are ihkwewa

These two words are clearly related. Presumably the Europeans heard the latter and produced the former when they tried to pronounce it themselves.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 6:46:39 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

From my point of view he put up a piece of false propaganda got called on it and put up an incredibly offensive red herring to change the subject.


Not one thing is the OP, or any of my other posts in the thread was "false". Please provide any proof that you think you have.

Firm

IMHO, the "9/11 Tweets" OP was misleading in two ways:

(a) It omitted the important adjective "first," used by the source to which the OP linked, making it sound as if the volunteer-recruiting pitch was the President's only comment on the 9/11 anniversary.

(b) It neglected to distinguish between a run-of-the-mill campaign tweet and the President's own, actual, appropriate observation about 9/11, even though the Barack Obama Twitter page clearly states how to identify a tweet that came personally from the President. Later in the thread, the volunteer pitch was, if memory serves, described--inaccurately imho--as bearing "the impress of the President of the United States."

Whether these editorial shortcomings were sleights of hand or simple sloppiness, I don't know.



_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 7:41:01 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

WOW.... it now appears that Algonquian word meaning "the totality of Woman" is a racial slur on the collarme boards


You were misinformed.

By itself, "squaw" means nothing in any living Algonquian language and no Indian speaker would ever use it to refer to herself, any more than an English woman would refer to herself as an "ess." (The words for 'woman' in the three languages listed above are ihkwewa, epit, and behanem, incidentally.)

It is also not an Indian word and no Indians ever use it among themselves.

http://www.native-languages.org/iaq5.htm

Edit to add: I hope this explanation brings it back to on-topic (racism)

mod note : entered accidentally, no edit done



http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/squaw.html

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 8:12:42 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
I suggest you re-read your source.

Squaw is NOT an English word. It IS a phoenetic rendering of an Algonkian word that does NOT translate to "a woman's private parts." The word "squaw" - as "esqua," "squa," "skwa," "skwe" and other variants - traditionally means the totality of being female, not just the female anatomy. The word has been interpreted by modern activists as a slanderous assault against Native American women. But traditional Algonkian speakers, in both Indian and English, still say words like "nidobaskwa" = a female friend, "manigebeskwa" = woman of the woods, or "Squaw Sachem" = female chief. When Abenaki people sing the Birth Song, they address "nuncksquassis" = "little woman baby."

The Lakota word for woman is winyan.

The Cherokee is Agehya.

ASDZA: Navajo name

HAUSIS, HAUSISSE: Algonquin name meaning old woman.

KOKYANGWUTI: Hopi name meaning spider woman at middle-age."

MAHAL: woman

WUTI: Hopi name meaning "woman."

http://www.native-languages.org/vocabulary.htm

Many tribes have many different languages. Since squaw became a pejorative in the last century, and its been plainly stated as such in your link, I find it curious you wish to continue to slander women like myself with such a term.


< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 9/24/2012 8:13:18 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 8:20:11 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
One thing that contributes to this is that there seems to be two different definitions/understandings of what anti-Semitism is. Most people would, I hope, agree that anti-Semitism refers to disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. In the USA there seems to be a genuine belief held by some that either any or excessive criticism of the Israeli State, on any grounds, constitutes anti-Semitism. I know of nowhere else, (and that includes Israel itself) where this definition is accepted.

Until this matter is sorted out and a single standard agreed and operating, it seems inevitable that this confusion, and the accompanying rancour will persist. So this seems to me to be as good a time as any to have that discussion and hopefully find some agreement on this contentious issue.

I propose to use my definition: anyone who has a circumcised penis, or has a father or grandfather with a circumcised penis, or is part of a population in which circumcision is practiced - is a Jew. Please notice that this definition does not distinguish between dress, holy books nor festivities nor countries, It simply is a convenient concept; we might as easily rename the concept 'Circs' or 'Bwlewaprs', but such names would be foreign to most people.



I am quoting this particular post because it includes both posts that I want to address. The first one, since I do not post as a regular user, is a point I want to interject in part as a user, not as a "Collarme site" answer.

Rule: I am not giving an opinion on your statement, but felt the need to post this because Im not sure if you are actually aware of this practice in the United States. According to the statement you made, I am Jewish, and almost everyone I know is Jewish, if the deciding factor is the PHYSICAL PRACTICE of circumcision. When my son was born 32 years ago, they didn't even ask me if I wanted him circumcised or not, they scheduled a procedure to have it done before we left the hospital at his birth, because it was the most common practice here. I am not saying whether you are right or wrong, just by your definition I am Jewish, and all my family is, and some of the Christian Baptists in my extended family would argue for hours with you about that . I don't expect a reply about this and do not want to cause this thread to continue in this vein, just wanted to make sure you were actually aware of this practice in the USA, since you are a citizen of another country.

As to the definition of antisemitism in relation to TOS and how it applies on these boards:

Disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness or following recognized practices whether religious or not that is attributable to being either of the Jewish race or religion, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. This all addresses their RACE or religion, it has nothing to do with political beliefs or the arena. Therefore, criticism of the Israeli state is not anti-Semitism. Other racial/religious comments that are not allowed can include, but not be limited to, any derogatory comment attacking someone because of something they practice or believe because of their race, gender, religious, or sexual beliefs.

That is not all encompassing but hopefully that answers tweakabelle's and others questions.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 8:31:34 PM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster

this got modded ( really fucking fast) as I posted it as a relpy to a mod, so for the last time........... re who you can talk about and how.
Hope it makes sense as it was a reply to post #88, if it doesn't then so be it

this is exactly what MM was talking about. I know you are just doing your TOS thing but the idea that I can freely call POTUS a cunt but I can't call "generic collarme member" a cunt without being subject to censure is patently stupid. You know it, I know it, and everyone else here knows it. Of course people should be more mature and sensible but remember where we are, an anonymous website. Let people decide for themselves on this free platform for debate who and what they want to read because as it stands it is going to die a slow and painful death.

Bye




Now for a long answer that maybe can shed some light. I am putting this in here to show PARTIALLY some of the items taken into consideration and examples.

A link to the forum guidelines:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=72
A VERY SMALL SNIPPET BECAUSE OF THE LENGTH OF THIS POST
While debate is fine, postings of the sort generally known as "flames" is not. Participants are not expected to coddle one another, but they are expected to keep things within the realm of maturity.

The reasons you are calling POTUS a cunt does not constitute a personal attack or flame. It is reasonably assumed that if you are calling a COLLARME member a cunt, you are referring to them PERSONALLY. If you were not, you would be making a statement about something they said, which is allowable.

YOU ARE ALLOWED TO ATTACK THE POST, NOT THE POSTER

Here is a good rule of thumb. Any statement that is made that is a “you” statement, that is derogatory in nature, is not going to be allowed.

President Abraham Lincoln was the most stupid president that existed in history because he believed the sky was blue. I’m surprised that he was able to put his pants on correctly in the morning with out help…..ACCEPTABLE.,

To generic collarmemember member. You are the most stupid person I have ever known because you believe the sky is blue. I’m surprised that you are able to put your pants on correctly…. UNACCEPTABLE

To generic collarme member: The idea that the sky is blue is laughable and ludicrous and stupid! Wow. I cant believe anyone believes that! ACCEPTABLE.

To generic collarme member: The idea that the sky is blue is laughable and ludicrous and stupid! Wow. I cant believe you believe that! UNACCEPTABLE.

I can only cover a little bit about the grey area that seems to confuse people, because it is on a case by case basis and is based in large part on INTENT,

If you are talking about an idea, etc. no matter whether, right, left, middle, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Tea Party, and whatever all the other terms, it is acceptable.

To say because YOU are any one of the above YOU are “derogatory comment” is not acceptable.

It is really hard to make a personal attack without using the term you.It’s not the only way to do it, and possible other ways, but is almost certain if it is used, and is derogatory in any manner. If in doubt, honestly, you can email a Collarme Team moderator and ask them if a particular statement would be viewed as a personal attack, and get an answer. My advice would be to carefully analyze any statement you are preparing to make that has the term “you” in it before clicking send. If you don’t, please don’t be surprised if you get a post pulled, and a note from one of us.


_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to hardcybermaster)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/24/2012 11:49:27 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

VideoAdminAlpha
quote:



ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
One thing that contributes to this is that there seems to be two different definitions/understandings of what anti-Semitism is. Most people would, I hope, agree that anti-Semitism refers to disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. In the USA there seems to be a genuine belief held by some that either any or excessive criticism of the Israeli State, on any grounds, constitutes anti-Semitism. I know of nowhere else, (and that includes Israel itself) where this definition is accepted.

Until this matter is sorted out and a single standard agreed and operating, it seems inevitable that this confusion, and the accompanying rancour will persist. So this seems to me to be as good a time as any to have that discussion and hopefully find some agreement on this contentious issue.



As to the definition of antisemitism in relation to TOS and how it applies on these boards:

Disparaging either Jews as a whole, or individually, or the Jewish race/religion solely or substantially on account of their Jewishness or following recognized practices whether religious or not that is attributable to being either of the Jewish race or religion, singling out Jews for special treatment solely because they are Jewish. This all addresses their RACE or religion, it has nothing to do with political beliefs or the arena. Therefore, criticism of the Israeli state is not anti-Semitism. Other racial/religious comments that are not allowed can include, but not be limited to, any derogatory comment attacking someone because of something they practice or believe because of their race, gender, religious, or sexual beliefs.


Thank you VDA for your clarification of the TOS and its definition of anti-Semitism.

While there are minor differences between this version and the version I outlined in my previous post (#75), I have no problems or issues with your definition and won't have any problems living with it. I hope all others who participate in Occupied Palestine/Israel feel the same.

I am delighted that we have a clear unequivocal statement of the TOS and an unambiguous ruling of what anti-Semitism is and what it isn't. I hope that this will put an end to the abuse of those who air views critical of current Israeli policies for once and for all, and the idiotic notion that any criticism of Israeli policies is and can only be anti-Semitic is finally and permanently laid to rest. I hope that this ruling will be vigourously enforced, lest any of the past rancour re-surface.

Finally lest there be any confusion, I would like to dissociate myself completely from Rule's nonsensical response to my initial post. I am unable to find anything in Rule's post that I agree with, or even take seriously.


_____________________________



(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/25/2012 1:36:32 AM   
gungadin09


Posts: 3232
Joined: 3/19/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
...Aswad's corollary to Hanlon's Razor states that one should attribute an observed fault to the least objectionable trait that will adequately account for it...


I'm so stealing this.

Pam

ETA: Sorry to see you go, MM.



< Message edited by gungadin09 -- 9/25/2012 1:50:43 AM >


_____________________________

[link] www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlvDnbFOkYY [/link]

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/25/2012 8:51:37 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

That was a general comment and not a response to anything you said. Didn't mean to imply otherwise.


My mistake. Sorry.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/25/2012 8:59:31 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09

I'm so stealing this.


By all means do, Pam. Few quotes of mine are as dear as that one. I wouldn't mind if more people picked it up. That's sharing, not stealing.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to gungadin09)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/25/2012 4:17:48 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
Is that your's? It was very eloquent.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead f... - 9/25/2012 4:24:52 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FMRFGOPGAL

Is that your's? It was very eloquent.


Thank you. The corollary is mine. Hanlon's Razor itself is not.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to FMRFGOPGAL)
Profile   Post #: 112
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: No name calling . . . but racism and mocking dead friends is OK. Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.195