fucktoyprincess -> RE: Israel (10/2/2012 8:33:40 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ermood quote:
It's not accurate to describe this position as "denying the Holocaust". This will mislead most people. Most people will interpret "denying the Holocaust" as denying the entire event - all the systematic murders of millions of Jews, gypsies, gays, dissenters and others. You will be misunderstood and people will call you a racist and an anti-Semite. A more accurate rendition of your position is that you deny that any single group was the only or exclusive target of the Nazis. It is important to make this clear - otherwise your message lost in a negative reaction. In the end it's up to you of course. You need to decide which message you want to convey and then convey it clearly and precisely. The terms you currently use are counter-productive, if you don't mind my saying so. I have to say, you've got a point here.... i will think about it;) Yes, ermood, if your views are as you present them above, I would take greater care in how you express these sentiments in English because the word "deny" as explained accurately by tweakabelle implies you do not think it happened at all. Just be careful, because I think your argument is a nuanced one that many on these boards would actually agree with. Genocide of peoples has been occurring since the beginning of time whether under the guise of "tribe", "religion", "ethnicity", you name it. And all genocide is inherently evil and wrong. And yes, I would disagree with anyone who somehow feels that any particular genocide is of greater evil than any other. And let us be reminded that some genocides in history were actually successful. There are some peoples who are no longer on the face of the planet, at all. [:(]
|
|
|
|