Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:42:09 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Regarding Chamberlin and appeasement -

The English had to play the hand they were dealt, and at the time there wasn't much that England or the rest of the Europeans could do besides what they did, being caught on one foot. Remember the Soviets were the German allies at the time,


Would you care to tell us how the soviet union became the ally of germany?

Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union signed on 23 August 1939.

In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol dividing Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland into German and Soviet spheres of influence, anticipating potential "territorial and political rearrangements" of these countries. Thereafter, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded, on September 1 and 17 respectively, their respective sides of Poland, dividing the country between them. Part of southeastern (Karelia) and Salla region Finland was annexed by the Soviet Union after the Winter War. This was followed by Soviet annexations of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and the Hertza region.




That answers my question not at all.

Then either state your objection to the answer or try to ask your question with greater clarity. Perhaps you have your own special definition of the word "ally"

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:43:18 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"


They would have had their invasion fleet's ass spanked purple.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:45:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
That answers my question not at all.

quote:

Then either state your objection to the answer or try to ask your question with greater clarity. Perhaps you have your own special definition of the word "ally"


My question was and is why did the soviet union sign the non aggression pact with germany?

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:46:06 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"

They'd have won.
That doesn't alter the fact that you made a hugely incorrect statement about Germany beating the whole of Europe into submission, as they chose not to continue the "battle of Britain" or instigate operation sealion.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:49:50 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"


They would have had their invasion fleet's ass spanked purple.



You will not find many English who studied the history claiming that would be the case.

The English revealed after the war that they could only stand against the German air attack for a week or two more when the Germans ceased. And the Germans ceased due to the planned attack on the Russians.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:53:46 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"

They'd have won.



A cusory examination of operation sea lion will show that everytime germany began to assemble the landing craft necessary to cross the channel the raf would turn them into a pile of rubble. Germany's ability to support these landing craft was virtually non existant and what they did have would have been sent to the bottom of the channel by virtue of the britt radar and huge shore batteries. Hitler never had a prayer of a successful invasion of gb.
Russia,not gb had always been his goal as evidenced by his early writings. The only fly in the ointment was germany's believing it's own propaganda about the weakness of the soviet union.


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:54:55 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Actually, they ceased because their air force wasn't in much better shape than ours, and they didn't want it taking any more damage before they used it for air support in the invasion of Russia.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:56:50 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"

They'd have won.
That doesn't alter the fact that you made a hugely incorrect statement about Germany beating the whole of Europe into submission, as they chose not to continue the "battle of Britain" or instigate operation sealion.


They appear to have Europe pretty well beaten down on this map, especially as you admit they likely could take England -


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:56:55 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"


They would have had their invasion fleet's ass spanked purple.



You will not find many English who studied the history claiming that would be the case.

The English revealed after the war that they could only stand against the German air attack for a week or two more when the Germans ceased. And the Germans ceased due to the planned attack on the Russians.


None other than churchill says so in his book ww2. It is well footnoted giving churchill's sources and reasoning.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 12:58:09 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The bloody RAF and the verdamnt luftwaffe didn't really run the navy so much, so how did we get here?

I understand when dealing with the american gumby party, things can fly far afield, however. 

And how about petrol bowsers, then? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:00:26 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"

They'd have won.



A cusory examination of operation sea lion will show that everytime germany began to assemble the landing craft necessary to cross the channel the raf would turn them into a pile of rubble. Germany's ability to support these landing craft was virtually non existant and what they did have would have been sent to the bottom of the channel by virtue of the britt radar and huge shore batteries. Hitler never had a prayer of a successful invasion of gb.
Russia,not gb had always been his goal as evidenced by his early writings. The only fly in the ointment was germany's believing it's own propaganda about the weakness of the soviet union.



You're confusing two separate things here.
The battle of britain was an aeriel conflict between the Luftwaffe and the RAF. It kicked the hell out of both, but left the RAF in much worse shape. If it had kept going longer, they most likely wouldn't have been in any sort of shape to deal with German landing craft, because there wouldn't have been much in the way of an RAF left.
Also, Germany had taken the channel islands, and was working on a tunnels rather than using landing craft at all.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:00:46 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Actually, they ceased because their air force wasn't in much better shape than ours, and they didn't want it taking any more damage before they used it for air support in the invasion of Russia.


The raf had superior aircraft, pilots of equal skill, and of course radar which allowed the raf to fight and return to base without long flights to the battle zone.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:06:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

You're confusing two separate things here.
The battle of britain was an aeriel conflict between the Luftwaffe and the RAF. It kicked the hell out of both, but left the RAF in much worse shape. If it had kept going longer, they most likely wouldn't have been in any sort of shape to deal with German landing craft, because there wouldn't have been much in the way of an RAF left.
Also, Germany had taken the channel islands, and was working on a tunnels rather than using landing craft at all.

_____________________________


I am not confusing anything. The spitfire took the measure of the german fighters. The lancaster dropped their bombs where they chose. While the germans held the channel islands it would still take landing craft (which were non existant)to get to them from the continent.
The lack of allied landing craft was one of the primary reasons that the invasion of the continent was postponed until june of 44.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:10:49 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

What do you think would have happened if the Germans had not attacked Russia, and instead consolidated their conquests and continued the "Battle of Britain?"

They'd have won.
That doesn't alter the fact that you made a hugely incorrect statement about Germany beating the whole of Europe into submission, as they chose not to continue the "battle of Britain" or instigate operation sealion.


They appear to have Europe pretty well beaten down on this map, especially as you admit they likely could take England -



Then you're looking at a different map.
Holland caved, there's no doubt of that. However lots of Europe didn't. Germany didn't take the UK. Switzerland and Ireland sat out the conflict. Russia bitchslapped Germany bigtime. Even "occupied" countries like France put up a lot more trouble through resistance movements than people who can't get their heads around the fact that that Homer's line about "cheese eating surrender monkeys" was meant to be another example of his habitual pig ignorance can get their heads around.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:11:59 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
The only relevance is that this resulted in the Anglo-Soviet invasion, done in order to keep BP refineries and such out of Nazi hands. The king was deposed and his son Reza Pahlavi placed on the throne.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:14:35 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Actually, they ceased because their air force wasn't in much better shape than ours, and they didn't want it taking any more damage before they used it for air support in the invasion of Russia.


The raf had superior aircraft, pilots of equal skill, and of course radar which allowed the raf to fight and return to base without long flights to the battle zone.

Superior aircraft is debatable. What the Germans were putting up was adequete to make mincemeat out of our own air force radar or not.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:19:15 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
~FR~
Back to the OP . . . . Fuck your WWII . . . . that was soooo yesterday
The last battle of colonialism is being played out in the ME today.
What would Ariel Sharon do regarding Iran's alleged nukes?
Would he arm wrassel Ahmadidejon?
Was Ariel a brilliant military leader or just a thug?
Is Ariel still attached to "life" support or has he left the building?
Do you really, truly think Bibi will attack Iran without US support?
Any of the above?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 1:31:57 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
Netanyahu just formed an alliance with this band of reactionaries -

quote:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party approved joining forces in Israel's coming parliamentary election with the party of ultranationalist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, despite the opposition of Likud members who fear the move may backfire.

The new bloc combines Israel's two main right-wing parties in a bid to ensure that Mr. Netanyahu, already heavily favored to win re-election to a third term in office, emerges from the January vote as the sole party leader with the ability to form a majority in the 120-seat parliament.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204840504578086910726500562.html?mod=googlenews_wsj


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 2:09:25 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

Netanyahu just formed an alliance with this band of reactionaries -

quote:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party approved joining forces in Israel's coming parliamentary election with the party of ultranationalist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, despite the opposition of Likud members who fear the move may backfire.

The new bloc combines Israel's two main right-wing parties in a bid to ensure that Mr. Netanyahu, already heavily favored to win re-election to a third term in office, emerges from the January vote as the sole party leader with the ability to form a majority in the 120-seat parliament.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204840504578086910726500562.html?mod=googlenews_wsj



So, you think that seals the deal? Bomb, bomb Iran?
If so, what is America's role . . . . and why?

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" - 10/30/2012 3:27:40 PM   
FMRFGOPGAL


Posts: 763
Joined: 9/1/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

I was just trashing youyr phoney assertions that there wasn't any reason to believe they're out of compliance.


False. Your initial claim, which I disputed and called on you to substantiate was "Iran should be strung up for threarening[sic] the nuclear proliferation treaty." (post #13)

Whatever your intentions, your manifest failure to back up this wild assertion with any evidence only succeeded in trashing your own credibility. Just in case there was any doubt about your intentions, you repeat your error:
quote:

It must be frustrating having to continually be an apologist for a group of states that use Hezbollah, Hamas The Taliban and Al Qaeda
as their primary ambassadors.

If you read any of my posts, you will be familiar with the contempt I repeatedly express for all theocratic movements, including those so influential in your own country - the Religious Right. Again, the only thing trashed here is the cred of someone who would make such a nonsensical claim. It appears you are intent on turning self sabotage into a lifestyle. Good luck with that.



Oh Bullshit.

You say whatever keeps you specious argument afloat for one more desperate post to push your agenda. The fact is, there's blame enough on both sides.
   And you continued practice of denying that there aren't unsolicited terror attacks planned and executed by Palestinian extremists, is simply parodying intelligent discourse.
  So be clear on this point. If you dish out bullshit, be prepared to be treated like someone doing so.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UK Govt: Iran strike "illegal" Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109