RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/14/2012 6:39:11 PM)

I`m fully ok with letting the 'secessionistas' embarrass themselves as much and for as long as the want.....


It`s part of being free and enjoying liberty.


Interesting the these "freedom luvers" were fine with Mittens and the GOP coercing and blackmailing folks into voting republican.....[8|]




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/14/2012 7:04:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

We, the people, will not let these states suceed peaceably unless the following conditions are met:

1.  Any federal monies in excess of those paid in are to be repaid at interest and before sucession. 
2.  All federal roads, bridges and appurtenances,  are to be removed from entry and exit and through out your state, and returned to us in usable condition.
3.  Any airwaves are to be blocked from entering or exiting your state, at your cost and the plan approved by the Federal government.
4.  All federal reservations are to be bought by the state at fair market value, and paid with interest before sucession.

And that is just a small start on what you suceeders have to do.  Or we go right to the nukes.



izzat really the law?




Owner59 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/14/2012 8:37:31 PM)

Great piece from Phoenix New Times



http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2012/11/attention_arizona_secessionist.php



Peels the onion back a little and explores just exactly what`s involved with Az seceding.

"What the hell do you name it?

Listen, forget the logistics of the whole thing, since it's obvious nobody thought that far ahead. That said, why hasn't anybody picked a name for your new country? Suggestions from our readers thus far include "Dumbastistan," "State of Shitforbrainsylvania," "The Republikkk of Dumbfuckistan." Also, make sure you retain a sculptor throughout the movement, so he can erect that J.T. Ready statue outside the new capitol".




tazzygirl -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/14/2012 8:43:06 PM)

Sad, isnt it?




Owner59 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/14/2012 9:07:24 PM)

Nods....

This,   sadder still.....

"A gay Key West businessman, distraught over the re-election of President Barack Obama, intentionally took his own life by overdosing on pills, according to multiple news sources in the Sunshine State.

Henry Smith Hamilton Jr., 64, told his partner, “If Barack gets re-elected, I’m not going to be around.” Hamilton, who owned a tanning parlor, apparently believed the dire warnings from hate-radio pundits that an Obama victory would be devastating for small business owners
 



http://www.wisconsingazette.com/breaking-news/gay-owner-of-key-west-tanning-parlor-commits-suicide-over-obamas-re-election.html




Zonie63 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 4:00:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Great piece from Phoenix New Times



http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2012/11/attention_arizona_secessionist.php



Peels the onion back a little and explores just exactly what`s involved with Az seceding.

"What the hell do you name it?

Listen, forget the logistics of the whole thing, since it's obvious nobody thought that far ahead. That said, why hasn't anybody picked a name for your new country? Suggestions from our readers thus far include "Dumbastistan," "State of Shitforbrainsylvania," "The Republikkk of Dumbfuckistan." Also, make sure you retain a sculptor throughout the movement, so he can erect that J.T. Ready statue outside the new capitol".



If Arizona secedes, though, it would give an opportunity for the movement for "Baja Arizona" to secede from Arizona and stay within the United States.




mnottertail -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 6:47:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

We, the people, will not let these states suceed peaceably unless the following conditions are met:

1.  Any federal monies in excess of those paid in are to be repaid at interest and before sucession. 
2.  All federal roads, bridges and appurtenances,  are to be removed from entry and exit and through out your state, and returned to us in usable condition.
3.  Any airwaves are to be blocked from entering or exiting your state, at your cost and the plan approved by the Federal government.
4.  All federal reservations are to be bought by the state at fair market value, and paid with interest before sucession.

And that is just a small start on what you suceeders have to do.  Or we go right to the nukes.



izzat really the law?


It is roughly what was done in the civil war (minus the nukes but hey that was so 1860's)  that it would serve as a precedent, and I didn't see alotta winning lawsuits against that.




Owner59 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 7:58:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Great piece from Phoenix New Times



http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2012/11/attention_arizona_secessionist.php



Peels the onion back a little and explores just exactly what`s involved with Az seceding.

"What the hell do you name it?

Listen, forget the logistics of the whole thing, since it's obvious nobody thought that far ahead. That said, why hasn't anybody picked a name for your new country? Suggestions from our readers thus far include "Dumbastistan," "State of Shitforbrainsylvania," "The Republikkk of Dumbfuckistan." Also, make sure you retain a sculptor throughout the movement, so he can erect that J.T. Ready statue outside the new capitol".



If Arizona secedes, though, it would give an opportunity for the movement for "Baja Arizona" to secede from Arizona and stay within the United States.


Thanks Zonie,

I looked that up and found this.

http://www.economist.com/node/18486323

This is something I`ve never heard of this before and after reading the piece,can make better sense of the things I did know about AZ




Fightdirecto -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 11:08:22 AM)

Anti-secession petitions




mnottertail -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 11:09:33 AM)

So, the 57 states WAS prophetic.............




graceadieu -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:30:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie
The real danger is in that the left assumes that those who do not want as they do will quietly acquiesce.

....?
We live in a democracy, in case you've forgotten. Majority rule. If your party loses, then you suck it up and try again next time. And if you win then, your opponent needs to step down gracefully and accept that, too.
If the response to losing an election is for the losers to take up arms and forcibly refuse to accept the outcome, that's the end of democracy in this country. Our form of government only works because we've all agreed not to do that kind of thing.


Just a point of order here... we live in a republic, not a democracy. We are not simply a "majority rules," or "winner take all" system. The secession kick isn't about losing an election, it's about the perception that the America of the US Constitution is being lost. The America of the US Constitution is something to take up arms and forcibly protect.


And what, exactly, is "the America of the US Constitution"? The one where blacks are 3/5 of a person and only white male property owners can vote?

The Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents, open to interpretation. How they're interpreted by the Supreme Court and followed by Congress and the Executive branch have been changing and evolving for over 200 years, as the world changes and new challenges and questions arise. Getting up in arms now because our government and laws aren't the same as they were in 1789 is absurd.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:41:38 PM)

[:D]



[image]local://upfiles/502828/09EA0C9CD26F4BDF9FC1591F862E5330.jpg[/image]




graceadieu -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:43:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

fr

It's entertaining to see the Leftists say 'go, leave" to the Separatists. The parasites telling their host to go is majorly hysterical. [:D]


Since the blue states are the ones that the country's bills and support the red states, I'm not sure who you're calling parasites. [;)]

With the red states gone, and Uncle Sam not having to give them $1.50 in funding for every $1 they pay in taxes, I bet we could even balance the budget and pay off our debt!




mnottertail -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:43:39 PM)

They are gonna have to let everybody loose in prison as a precondition.  Those were federal prisons, federal laws, and federal judges for the most part, and certainly in means of a great deal of federal money, even the state ones.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:45:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie
The real danger is in that the left assumes that those who do not want as they do will quietly acquiesce.

....?
We live in a democracy, in case you've forgotten. Majority rule. If your party loses, then you suck it up and try again next time. And if you win then, your opponent needs to step down gracefully and accept that, too.
If the response to losing an election is for the losers to take up arms and forcibly refuse to accept the outcome, that's the end of democracy in this country. Our form of government only works because we've all agreed not to do that kind of thing.

Just a point of order here... we live in a republic, not a democracy. We are not simply a "majority rules," or "winner take all" system. The secession kick isn't about losing an election, it's about the perception that the America of the US Constitution is being lost. The America of the US Constitution is something to take up arms and forcibly protect.

And what, exactly, is "the America of the US Constitution"? The one where blacks are 3/5 of a person and only white male property owners can vote?


Really? You want to go there? Sheesh. Get over it already. The Constitution has been amended to correct a terrible act that was only allowed as a compromise.

quote:

The Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents, open to interpretation. How they're interpreted by the Supreme Court and followed by Congress and the Executive branch have been changing and evolving for over 200 years, as the world changes and new challenges and questions arise. Getting up in arms now because our government and laws aren't the same as they were in 1789 is absurd.


"Living" document? Not really. Amendable? Certainly. Was it designed to be changed simply by changing interpretation? I highly doubt it. Basing a system of laws on something that can be changed simply by time's alteration of word usage is probably one of the dumbest ideas ever. It's like the little pig that build his house on a sand foundation. Too shifty to stand the test of time.

When is it not absurd to get up in arms if government isn't playing by the rules set to limit it? Is it simply "throw your hands up in the air and let it go because it's been happening, so it may as well not be stopped?" It's a good thing the colonials didn't view the British governors that way. Regardless of how the times change, the US Constitution can be followed according to the original interpretations of how it was written (including the Amendments since passed).





mnottertail -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 12:47:36 PM)

Government is playing by the rules, cuz they make them.

perceptions are asswipe.  nobody wants to be nuked for faulty perception, do they?

Yeah, and fuck that constitution, don't copy it when you write yours, or by god we will def throw down on your ass.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 1:18:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Government is playing by the rules, cuz they make them.


And, right there is why they get away with it. The Federal Government was supposed to draw it's just powers from the States and the Citizens. If it is writing it's own rules, it is impossible to stop. Why would we have even needed a Constitution in the first place?

quote:

perceptions are asswipe.  nobody wants to be nuked for faulty perception, do they?


What is it you have going on with asswipes? You own a shitload (pun intended) of stock in Charmin?!?

quote:

Yeah, and fuck that constitution, don't copy it when you write yours, or by god we will def throw down on your ass.


Why? It's not like we're using it. [8D]




mnottertail -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 1:21:42 PM)

supposed to draw it's just powers from the States and the Citizens.

And it rather is, since the elected representatives are down there at our behest.  The issues came when they became professionals, allowed lobbyists to 'redress grievances', eschewed campaign finance reform, allowed these different PACs, and made corporations people.




Politesub53 -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 4:17:08 PM)

My feeling is some of those on the right need to secede their collective heads from their collective arses.




graceadieu -> RE: Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/15/2012 4:40:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu

The Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents, open to interpretation. How they're interpreted by the Supreme Court and followed by Congress and the Executive branch have been changing and evolving for over 200 years, as the world changes and new challenges and questions arise. Getting up in arms now because our government and laws aren't the same as they were in 1789 is absurd.


"Living" document? Not really. Amendable? Certainly. Was it designed to be changed simply by changing interpretation? I highly doubt it. Basing a system of laws on something that can be changed simply by time's alteration of word usage is probably one of the dumbest ideas ever.


That's too bad. The power of judicial review does in fact give the Supreme Court the power and duty to interpret the Constitution and apply to judge the constitutionality of the law.

And that interpretation - and thus the law - has not been constant over the years. The Constitution and Bill of Rights are, at times, quite vague and open to many interpretations. What is an "unreasonable" search? What punishments are "cruel and unusual"? How far does the Federal Government's power to regulate interstate commerce go? Etc etc.

I don't think that flexibility is dumb. I think it's been part of our success, because we can change with the times while still preserving our rights and (at least some) limits on government power.

quote:

Regardless of how the times change, the US Constitution can be followed according to the original interpretations of how it was written (including the Amendments since passed).


Which original interpretation? Hamilton's? Jefferson's? The Founding Fathers couldn't even agree on how to interpret the Constitution, and they came up with it!

(Edited to clear up quote tag fail)




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625