Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Michigan


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Michigan Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:02:51 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Did I say it was true?


Why would you post the link if you didn't think it was legit?


Look at the post I quoted. See how he brought this up? I was merely filling in missing information. No where did I say the man was telling the truth.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:03:03 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
Once these guys edit their film,they lose the right to use the film to further their argument and or point.
Why is that so hard for you guys on the right to accept ?
Given that ,and given that this has been the case for how the fuck long,why do your right wing provocateurs insist on putting forth edited films ?
There must be a reason,there has to be some reason we can not see the cut portion.The cynic in me tells me that this is because it does not further the point being made.
Therefore the whole exercise is suspect....simple really.


And that is precisely why I am interested in seeing the raw footage, as I've said a few times already. I'm not saying the Union guys weren't provoked. I'm saying their actions aren't appropriate and don't help their cause, which is true regardless of provocation.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:09:25 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
No, I think there are people with the ability to antagonize others to no end. As I said... I start out polite. Could be that man did too. I would get louder and more verbally insistent, so to speak. We dont know at what point they started taping their exchange, and what ended up on the "cutting room floor"


So, you are supporting that guy's actions, under the assumption that Crowder provoked it. I'm saying it's better to turn and walk away, especially if there is a camera anywhere near.

And, yes, I have walked away. And, yes, I have been followed. What do you think the rest of the protesters would have done had they seen Crowder following that guy, antagonizing him? Don't you think they would have crowded Crowder out? I do. Plus, Crowder wasn't right up in his face and was backing off while the guy continued.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:12:17 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Did I say it was true?

Why would you post the link if you didn't think it was legit?

Look at the post I quoted. See how he brought this up? I was merely filling in missing information. No where did I say the man was telling the truth.


Filling in missing information?!? What did you fill in? You filled in something that may or may not have been true. I mean, people on either side of the aisle have lied before. Your posting of that "interview" is tacit support for the allegation, which neither you nor I know is true or false.



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:40:44 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
No, I think there are people with the ability to antagonize others to no end. As I said... I start out polite. Could be that man did too. I would get louder and more verbally insistent, so to speak. We dont know at what point they started taping their exchange, and what ended up on the "cutting room floor"


So, you are supporting that guy's actions, under the assumption that Crowder provoked it. I'm saying it's better to turn and walk away, especially if there is a camera anywhere near.

And, yes, I have walked away. And, yes, I have been followed. What do you think the rest of the protesters would have done had they seen Crowder following that guy, antagonizing him? Don't you think they would have crowded Crowder out? I do. Plus, Crowder wasn't right up in his face and was backing off while the guy continued.


No, I said Im not going one way or the other without seeing the raw footage.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:43:41 PM   
ElChupa


Posts: 117
Joined: 11/14/2009
Status: offline
Union thuggery and this clown presidents inability to condemn it are sickening. Civility, what a freaking joke.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:44:57 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Did I say it was true?

Why would you post the link if you didn't think it was legit?

Look at the post I quoted. See how he brought this up? I was merely filling in missing information. No where did I say the man was telling the truth.


Filling in missing information?!? What did you fill in? You filled in something that may or may not have been true. I mean, people on either side of the aisle have lied before. Your posting of that "interview" is tacit support for the allegation, which neither you nor I know is true or false.




Do you believe edited footage is true? Im not worried if you believe its "tactic support" or not. My thing is finding out information and providing it to others based upon what people post.

Make a claim that 20% of high school students are dropping out because they would rather pick their nose, and I will look for that study. If no study, Im gonna ask where you got that information from.

Ken stated he was told by "people at the rally" that the group was tearing down their own tent. Sure enough, I find a video with a witness saying just that.

I am not responsible for how you interpret my posting such information.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:45:27 PM   
ThatDaveGuy69


Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Some things to consider:

Remember not so long ago when that call was put through to Governor Scott Walker by someone claiming to be one of the Koch bros? The caller asked if the Governor has sent agents into the crowd to rile things up. Walker said they had not but were considering it. They were considering it.

Union dues pay for more than political contributions and the salaries of union bosses. Many locals have separate unemployment funds that provide a little something extra above what a worker gets from the state. Is there a single company in the US that has any such fund for when they lay off workers?

In the case of the trades, union members have typically gone through a union-sanctioned trade school and spent time as an apprentice. They are well-trained in the latest building codes so you get the job done right, safely, and up to code.

For the last 30+ years the GOP has done everything they can to destroy unions in this country. Why? Because union members traditionally vote Democratic. And locals provide "boots on the ground" in an election year. So they co-opted the "religious right", they sent millions of union jobs to overseas factories, and push legislation to restirct collective bargaining rights at every turn. The outcome will be wages as low as those found in "developing" nations. Think you have a good job now? An H1B visa holder could easliy take it tomorrow. Or next year.

While I don't condone the violence shown in the video, if someone came around messing with your paycheck and your woking conditions, tell me things wouldn't get ugly real fast.

And yes, the GOP IS falling apart. They are openly at war with themselves over basic concepts like raising taxes to pay for wars. They are the party of Old White Guys and there just aren't that many of them around any more. It's so bad that Mitch McConnell filibustered himself on Monday! I think Anne Coulter might finally get it. She said on FOX the other day "We LOST the election!"

From the end of WW II through the late 70's, unions built the strongest middle class the world has ever known and this country prospered.

~Dave


_____________________________

He said I'd blown a seal. I said fix the damn thing and leave my private life out of this!
What happens in the event horizon STAYS in the Event Horizon!
I have zero tolerance for Zero Tolerance

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:53:31 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElChupa

Union thuggery and this clown presidents inability to condemn it are sickening. Civility, what a freaking joke.

Lots of "jokes" around these parts,freaking or otherwise.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to ElChupa)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 6:57:21 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
People who are smarter and/or better informed would tend to be better teachers and with no other metric available I stand by my statement.


And, you would be quite wrong. I had a teacher that couldn't teach worth a shit to the majority of students in the class. Though she had her BA, MA and Ph.D in math, she was incapable of explaining basic level introductory math (algebra up through pre-trigonometry) to their level. I had no problem with her explanations, but math and I are bff's. I was the go-to person for anyone who didn't understand what she said (and she couldn't explain things any other way). For the class she taught, she was not a good teacher at all. For an upper level, or advanced degree class? She could very well be perfectly fit. Also had another instructor with degrees in math (BA & Ph.D) & electrical engineering (MS), but was terrible at teaching math and electronics.

I had some good teachers and some poor teachers through HS, most of whom had Master's degrees.



Wrong. You provided no other metric. With no more information than you made available the choice would always be for the smarter and/or better informed teacher.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:19:58 PM   
switchdavid69


Posts: 53
Joined: 11/7/2012
Status: offline
Liberals/union members always are harping on 'freedom of choice'. I guess that doese'nt matter when someome wants to choose not to join a union.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:27:38 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: switchdavid69

Liberals/union members always are harping on 'freedom of choice'. I guess that doese'nt matter when someome wants to choose not to join a union.


They made that choice when they voted the Union in.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to switchdavid69)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:45:25 PM   
switchdavid69


Posts: 53
Joined: 11/7/2012
Status: offline
Now they are voting the union out.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:47:10 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
No, the workers voted it in.

Now the state is voting it out....

Actually, lets get precise.... they arent voting it out... they cant. They are merely changing the rules that people can chose to join or not.

.........and without a debate or representation for the Union workers.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 12/12/2012 8:48:50 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to switchdavid69)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:57:16 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Which rules, will be changed back when the lame duck session is over.


As well as .......


Michigan Lawmakers Are Trying To Sneak Through Extreme Abortion Restrictions In Lame Duck Session

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/12/2012 9:02:14 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 8:59:20 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

3) Impose further guidelines for the disposal of fetal remains. Michigan already has regulations in place to instruct medical professions about how they must dispose of fetal remains, but HB 5711 wants to go a step further, requiring fetal remains to be treated in the exact same manner as dead bodies. Doctors would be forced to fill out death forms and make arrangements for the fetal remains’ cremation or burial, imposing an emotional burden on the women whose pregnancies end through a medical miscarriage. No other state handles fetal remains at 10 weeks in the same way as it handles dead bodies.


On this alone they will be challenged and lose.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Michigan - 12/12/2012 11:52:10 PM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Chrysler lost the arbitration case so the issue is with either chrysler's legal staff or with a bad arbitrator. I fail to see how the union is at fault here.


Didn't they go to bat for these guys to get them reinstated?


_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Michigan - 12/13/2012 4:41:30 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69

Some things to consider:

Remember not so long ago when that call was put through to Governor Scott Walker by someone claiming to be one of the Koch bros? The caller asked if the Governor has sent agents into the crowd to rile things up. Walker said they had not but were considering it. They were considering it.


Sounds like something governments do. It wouldn't be the first time such a thing has happened. Trouble is, riling people up is something that can backfire on politicians who need political stability and moderation in order to survive. Sometimes, a controlled burn can get out of control. That's why politicians shouldn't play with fire like that.

quote:


Union dues pay for more than political contributions and the salaries of union bosses. Many locals have separate unemployment funds that provide a little something extra above what a worker gets from the state. Is there a single company in the US that has any such fund for when they lay off workers?


I'm not sure, although I know of some companies (like IBM) which gave their employees buy-outs and decent early retirements. Some companies might give more generous severance packages than others.

quote:


In the case of the trades, union members have typically gone through a union-sanctioned trade school and spent time as an apprentice. They are well-trained in the latest building codes so you get the job done right, safely, and up to code.


Aren't a lot of licensed contractors (plumbers, electricians, etc.) self-employed business owners? If so, would they still need to be part of the union?

quote:


For the last 30+ years the GOP has done everything they can to destroy unions in this country. Why? Because union members traditionally vote Democratic. And locals provide "boots on the ground" in an election year. So they co-opted the "religious right", they sent millions of union jobs to overseas factories, and push legislation to restirct collective bargaining rights at every turn. The outcome will be wages as low as those found in "developing" nations. Think you have a good job now? An H1B visa holder could easliy take it tomorrow. Or next year.


Quite true. Backed by big business, it stands to reason that the GOP will always support measures to increase their profit margin, which means going after unions, among other things. Ever since Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers, unions have passed their peak and are on the decline. In some cases, unions haven't really helped their own cause either, with a reputation for corruption and Mob influence, which helps the GOP and their pundits paint unions in an unfavorable light.

Jobs going overseas or to an H1B visa holder are more a consequence of public policies which allow that sort of thing, and I think it would happen regardless of whether unions existed or not. This is where I would lay some measure of blame upon the Democrats as well, since their own internal divisions and lack of backbone is how we ended up with NAFTA and the general push towards globalism which has contributed to the weakening of unions, the labor movement in general, and the overall economy in this country. I remember when NAFTA passed, the Republicans were unanimously for it, while the Democrats were divided. There were a number of Democratic holdouts, mainly from industrial states with strong union support, but Clinton was (somehow) able to get enough Democrats to change their minds to push through its passage.

But even without that, the direction the country was taking was clearly sending jobs overseas and allowing businesses to bypass unions and U.S. wage and labor laws.

Actually, what unions should do at this point is take a more global perspective. If the corporations are going global, then so should the unions. Instead of rallying at State capitols, they should be rallying at the U.S. Capitol, pressuring Congress to enact conditions that in order for a nation to receive Most Favored Nation trading status, they must allow labor organizers to operate freely and set up unions in their nations. They must have the right to collectively bargain and to strike for better conditions.

quote:


While I don't condone the violence shown in the video, if someone came around messing with your paycheck and your woking conditions, tell me things wouldn't get ugly real fast.


I can see that, although it still seems somewhat short-sighted. What's so sad about all this is that this seems more comparable to junkyard dogs fighting over scraps in the middle of the Rust Belt. It's not as if there's any hope for the future or that there's anything to look forward to. All that's left is to desperately hold on to what you've got and hope that you don't lose it.

quote:


And yes, the GOP IS falling apart. They are openly at war with themselves over basic concepts like raising taxes to pay for wars. They are the party of Old White Guys and there just aren't that many of them around any more. It's so bad that Mitch McConnell filibustered himself on Monday! I think Anne Coulter might finally get it. She said on FOX the other day "We LOST the election!"


I wouldn't be so quick to write off the GOP just yet, at least not until some third party can become strong enough to displace the Republicans. I would actually welcome the rise of one or more third parties to kind of shake things up a bit. Our political system desperately needs some new blood to revitalize it and come up with fresh ideas. I see a lot Old White Guys in the unions and on the Democratic side of the aisle, so maybe both parties need to start doing a better job.

quote:


From the end of WW II through the late 70's, unions built the strongest middle class the world has ever known and this country prospered.


Once again, I agree. One might well wonder just what in the hell has happened to us, but there's probably plenty of blame to go around. I wouldn't blame the unions for that, at least not anymore than I would blame the electorate as a whole for the candidates they vote for. We all should have known better, but now, we're in the crapper, fighting over scraps. Or perhaps something akin to scavenging over a beached whale.

I live in a right to work state, although there are some active unions here. Perhaps not enough; it's hard to start unions. Employees get fired if they try to start a union, and a lot of other people seem happy with their jobs don't see any need for unions. Better wages would be nice, but lower prices would also be nice. People can still get by on lower wages as long as prices and rents can remain under control, and perhaps that's where the solution may lie. We don't even have to tax the rich; all we have to do is lower prices.




(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Michigan - 12/13/2012 5:23:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
No, I think there are people with the ability to antagonize others to no end. As I said... I start out polite. Could be that man did too. I would get louder and more verbally insistent, so to speak. We dont know at what point they started taping their exchange, and what ended up on the "cutting room floor"

So, you are supporting that guy's actions, under the assumption that Crowder provoked it. I'm saying it's better to turn and walk away, especially if there is a camera anywhere near.
And, yes, I have walked away. And, yes, I have been followed. What do you think the rest of the protesters would have done had they seen Crowder following that guy, antagonizing him? Don't you think they would have crowded Crowder out? I do. Plus, Crowder wasn't right up in his face and was backing off while the guy continued.

No, I said Im not going one way or the other without seeing the raw footage.


In what situation is that guy's actions acceptable? That kind of rage shouldn't be visible for situations where you can walk away safely. And, with fellow Union members all over the place, why would that not have been the case (and why wasn't anyone helping or stopping him)?

How is it you can't take a side regarding this guy's reactions?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Michigan - 12/13/2012 5:28:18 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
No, the workers voted it in.
Now the state is voting it out....
Actually, lets get precise.... they arent voting it out... they cant. They are merely changing the rules that people can chose to join or not.
.........and without a debate or representation for the Union workers.


How did it pass through Michigan without showing up here, that Union voters were prevented from voting for their State officials?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Michigan Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.128