|
Fightdirecto -> NRA was pro-gun control when it came to Black Panthers (1/13/2013 12:17:22 PM)
|
quote:
WHILE TODAY’S NRA TAKES HARD-LINE POSITIONS AGAINST EVEN THE MOST MODEST GUN CONTROL MEASURES, THIS WAS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE. THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORY, THE NRA SUPPORTED GUN CONTROL, INCLUDING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN OWNERSHIP, AND WAS NOT FOCUSED ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
BUT THE ORGANIZATION HAD A CHANGE OF HEART IN THE 1970S WHEN THE BLACK PANTHERS ADVOCATED FOR AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. IRONICALLY, THE PANTHERS WERE THE FOUNDERS OF THE MODERN-DAY GUN RIGHTS MOVEMENT, WHICH BECAME THE PURVIEW OF PREDOMINANTLY WHITE, RURAL CONSERVATIVES.
The ambiguous reading of the Second Amendment notwithstanding, gun control is as old as the Republic, and the amendment was not interpreted as an absolute in the early days of the United States. There was a balance between individual rights and public safety.
For example…freed blacks were barred from gun ownership, reflecting fears that African-Americans would revolt. At the same time, the founders proscribed gun ownership to many whites, including those who would not swear their loyalty to the Revolution. And contrary to legend, the “Wild, Wild West” had the most severe gun control policies in America.
Meanwhile, the Black Codes of the post-Civil War South were designed to dis-empower blacks and reestablish white rule.
This included the prohibition on blacks possessing firearms - a law which was enforced by white gun owners such as the Ku Klux Klan, who terrorized black communities. The Northern framers of the Fourteenth Amendment and the first Civil Rights Act viewed gun rights as fundamental to upholding the constitutional protections of the freedmen.
WHEN PROHIBITION-ERA ORGANIZED CRIME LED TO THE ENACTMENT OF THE NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT OF 1934 - THE NATION’S FIRST FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LAWS - THE NRA NOT ONLY SUPPORTED RESTRICTIVE GUN CONTROL MEASURES, BUT DRAFTED LEGISLATION IN NUMEROUS STATES LIMITING THE CARRYING OF CONCEALED WEAPONS. WHEN NRA PRESIDENT KARL FREDERICK WAS ASKED BY CONGRESS WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT IMPOSED ANY RESTRICTIONS ON GUN CONTROL, HE RESPONDED THAT HE HAD “NOT GIVEN IT ANY STUDY FROM THAT POINT OF VIEW.”
FREDERICK SAID HE DID “NOT BELIEVE IN THE GENERAL PROMISCUOUS TOTING OF GUNS. I THINK IT SHOULD BE SHARPLY RESTRICTED AND ONLY UNDER LICENSES.” HE HELPED DRAFT THE UNIFORM FIREARMS ACT, A MODEL LAW WHICH REQUIRED A POLICE PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON, A REGISTRY OF ALL GUN PURCHASES, AND A TWO-DAY WAITING PERIOD FOR FIREARMS SALES.
In the 1960s, the NRA continued to support gun control, a wave which was fueled by the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, and the racial strife and violent uprisings in the nation’s urban centers.
THE NRA ACTIVELY LOBBIED IN FAVOR OF THE GUN CONTROL ACT OF 1968, WHICH BANNED GUN SALES BY MAIL, AND ENACTED A SYSTEM OF LICENSING THOSE PEOPLE AND COMPANIES WHO BOUGHT AND SOLD FIREARMS. Franklin Orth, then the executive vice president of the NRA, said that although certain aspects of the law “appear unduly restrictive and unjustified in their application to law-abiding citizens, the measure as a whole appears to be one that the sportsmen of America can live with.”
DURING THAT TIME, THE NRA AND CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS SUCH AS CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR RONALD REAGAN SUPPORTED GUN CONTROL AS A MEANS OF RESTORING SOCIAL ORDER, AND GETTING WEAPONS OUT OF THE HANDS OF RADICAL, LEFT-LEANING AND REVOLUTIONARY GROUPS, PARTICULARLY THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY.
Responding to the perceived failures of the nonviolent civil rights movement, the Black Panthers took a more militant and uncompromising approach of the fallen leader Malcolm X. Led by figures including Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale, the Panthers’ “by any means necessary” approach included a most aggressive gun ownership policy to protect their communities from police abuse.
Beginning in 1966, the Panthers carried out police patrols, in which they rushed to the scene of an arrest with their loaded weapons publicly displayed, and notified those being arrested of their constitutional rights. CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATOR DON MULFORD INTRODUCED A BILL TO REPEAL THE STATE LAW ALLOWING CITIZENS TO CARRY LOADED GUNS IN PUBLIC IF THEY WERE OPENLY DISPLAYED. MULFORD HAD THE PANTHERS IN MIND WITH THIS LEGISLATION.
On May 2, 1967, a group of Black Panthers protested the bill by walking into the California State Capitol Building fully armed. In response, the legislature passed the Mulford Act. And Gov. Reagan, who was a major proponent of disarming the Panthers, signed the bill into law, effectively neutralizing the Panther Police Patrols…
IN 1977, HARLON CARTER AND HIS FACTION STAGED A COUP WITHIN THE NRA, AGAINST AN ESTABLISHMENT THAT WANTED TO SHIFT AWAY FROM GUN CONTROL AND CRIME IN FAVOR OF CONSERVATION AND SPORTSMEN’S ISSUES.
WITH THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY AND OTHER LEFT WING GUN CONTROL FOES OUT OF THE PICTURE, THE NEW HARD-LINE NRA FEARED THE GOVERNMENT WOULD SIMILARLY TAKE AWAY THEIR GUNS. FURTHER, THESE PREDOMINANTLY WHITE AND CONSERVATIVE GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES IN THE NRA SHARED THE PANTHERS’ DISTRUST OF THE POLICE.
Ironically, Ronald Reagan - who had signed the Mulford Act to disarm the Black Panther Party - changed his stance and advocated for guns as a defense against state power.
“So isn’t it better for the people to own arms than to risk enslavement by power-hungry men or nations? The founding fathers thought so,” Reagan said in a radio commentary in 1975.
In 1980, the NRA endorsed Reagan for president, the first such endorsement by the group. Less than a year later, President Reagan and three others were shot and injured by John Hinckley, Jr., 25, outside the Washington Hilton Hotel.
NRA was pro-gun control when it came to Black Panthers
[image]local://upfiles/42188/74DA4852D37D43B594EF9D878D971469.jpg[/image]
Unrestricted gun ownership would not just be only for the group (racial, ethnic or political) you belong to - it would be for every American – even the 4 or 5 members of the New Black Panthers.
|
|
|
|
