|
Snitch -> RE: are there any real women on hear ??? bay area ?? its just a ??? (2/13/2013 7:47:44 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mrdeepstroker510
still woundering if some of the people ive been chating with is even real ... Please comment ..
Two general area of comment top assist the 26 year old black male dom from the SF bay area seeking submissive women ...
1. Bay area
2. Real people
In the SF bay area, you have the best munches on the planet (well, maybe in Deutschland they're up to snuff), but otherwise, you have access to a dozen local munches that others would die for to have in their vicinity. So get your google out of your lap and seek them out. The price of admission is a meal or even just a drink (for the wet munches).
Also, in the SF bay area, you have the clubs such as the Citadel and Power Exchange (although the latter is NOT recommended and the former may not even be still in business). These things come and go, as witnessed by Alex and Allie's Edges over by the San Jose airport and their prior incarnations up on the East Bay 880 spur.
In addition, if you have a hundred and fifty smackers, you can learn the ropes, literally, at the gates or at backdrop, where you pick from a bevy of young willing lasses, and for an hour you swing them from the chandeliers and use all the nice bondage equipment and experiment as you will with them, so as to become a dom worth the capitalization.
Ok, nuff for the SF bay area, the mecca of kink. Now on to the diatribe about 'real' people.
Oh, where to start. Oh my. First, use what most people use, which is your intuition. That will serve you well, in about five seconds, for, oh, maybe 1/3 of the fakes. Those are the ones EVERYONE can see through, from the dumbest on this site to the most intelligent - all can see the obvious ones. You can too. So put them on "hide" after reporting them and then move on to hide the less-than-obvious fakes.
First thing you do is filter outward. Put your filter on 5 miles, and most recent. Then scroll to the END of that list (you know, the ones who were last on in 2008), and put them on hide, en masse. Yep. One by one, click on them (takes only a second per profile and they're out of your life forever.) I would suggest anything not on the prior year, you put on hide - but you pick your cutoff (and don't argue with me about it because it's up to you).
There now, you've just cleared the field in about 1 second per profile.
Now you need to put your filter on images only and then spend another ten seconds per profile verifying the pictures for the ones that passed your intuition filter (trust me, 90% of THOSE that passed are still fake profile pictures). Omit the ones clearly meant to be artistic as most of those are stolen, but for good reasons. Concentrate on the ones intended to allure you into misthinking they are of the profile.
Simply right click on them and send them to both Tineye and Google reverse at the same time. You don't even need to look further as you can do this en masse also, and then control W the ones that come up blank. This will leave the profiles not being what they purport to be (which, sadly to say, will be the majority). Good news though. You report and hide all those. (And, if you're a good citizen, you post those profiles over to the collarmefakes Tineye section so that the third search works for you and for all others to follow - as you ARE a good netizen, aren't you? (Or are you just selfish?) Your acts will betray you.
OK. Where are we now? Hey, look'it this! After, oh, maybe about five minutes in total, you've CLEARED out all the obvious and nearly obvious fakes from your search. Wow! Now, instead of scores of profiles within 5 miles of your location, you now only have a single page of about 5 to explore.
Here comes the harder part before you actually stoop to the level of actually READING the profiles. Nope. Not yet.
Now, search for the obvious keywords that YOU don't want to deal with. For example, single keywords such as "tribute" "token" "gift" "amazon" and anything with a dollar sign are indicative of certain types of profiles. This negative keyword stuff is highly specific to YOUR needs and wants so I'll leave that up to you. The point is to eliminate the "real" profiles asking for things you don't want to deal with. Of course, all along, you should be clicking the other searchable items such as height, weight, ethnicity, etc. that is of interest to you.
OK. Now you've whittled the seemingly endless pack into about five or ten profiles within five miles of you who aren't fake and who meet your criteria. This whole process only took about five minutes because you didn't READ anything yet. All you did was use technology (and if others have better ideas, please chime in as I'm always adding to MY repertoire).
For the first time in this five-minute process, you are now to READ the profiles. Yes. READ them. It's now time to invest in what you consider real people. At this point, my technological advice will be to no avail (unless and until they correspond with you - at that point, Spokeo and Pipl and the others take root).
Those five or ten profiles are jewels to you. Give them (and only them) the time and energy they deserve! If, after those peter out, then move your radius to 10 miles, and repeat the filtering process. But keep math in mind. Remember your high-school math. Doubling the radius squares the area covered. That's why you start out at 5 miles.
Anyone who uses a radius greater than, oh, about 25 miles to weed out fakes, is absolutely crazy because the numbers of profiles by that time that are clearly fake would consume your available energy for the rest of all time. (I truly pity the people who even attempt this - even WITH technology at their stead.)
There. I've said it. I hope it helps you. If not, please ignore.
|
|
|
|
