Nosathro
Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005 From: Orange County, California Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 If he was facing the guy, distance doesn't matter, the family of the shooter was still under threat. If the robber was retreating, and had his back to the family, the shot was unjustified. I don't know the law, but I think the shooter is more likely to end up being toasted than charged. We're talking about armed robbery here. That's a fucking death threat. This is a guy pointing a gun at women and children. Even granting the absence of any immediate danger, to just let him walk away when you could have stopped him puts it on you if he kills someone the next time. That leg shot was a nicely measured response, but obviously he still needed convincing. I'd have put a second one in him. K. Yes you don't know the law here are the definitions of robbery, armed robbery and death threat. The illegal stealing or taking of anotherÂ’s property from that person or another by violence or by threat of violence; aggravated larceny. The personal threat of violence and implicit fear on the part of the victim are essential in order to distinguish robbery from burglary. armed robbery Robbery committed by a felon carrying a dangerous weapon, whether or not that weapon is actually used or even shown. The crime is tried as any robbery would be in most states, but the weapon serves to bump up the severity of the crime. Under state criminal codes, which vary by state, it is an offense to knowingly utter or convey a threat to cause death or bodily harm to any person. It is also an offense to threaten to burn, destroy or damage property or threaten to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that belongs to a person
|