RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Rule -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/18/2013 5:12:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic
Body counts are only wins, when the enemy, the enemy's family and friends, the enemies children, are all dead.

Let's limit it to the savages in arms, okay?

Actually I would advocate to make it future law that the male relatives of savages who perpetrate attacks such as the Boston bombings are also put to death, or at least prevented from reproducing the alleles of the savage that they are presumably have; not applicable to the relatives of the current perpetrators of course.




Aswad -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 3:51:02 PM)

~fr~

Looking at Watertown, it strikes me that, once again, a couple of guys have brought a city to its knees, though with fewer casualties this time.

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?

The cost of lost business alone must be immense, providing incentive for such attacks.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




DomKen -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 4:23:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

~fr~

Looking at Watertown, it strikes me that, once again, a couple of guys have brought a city to its knees, though with fewer casualties this time.

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?

The cost of lost business alone must be immense, providing incentive for such attacks.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


The alternatives really were not much better. The authorities know he had bombs and at least one gun. Do you let the mall open so he can blow himself up in the food court at lunch time? Or does he do it on the subway at rush hour? Maybe he's got aticket for the Red Sox or Bruins tonight...




Rule -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 5:18:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
The cost of lost business alone must be immense, providing incentive for such attacks.

Mm. On the other hand this does provide hundreds of millions of people with a lengthy amusement 'reality' show, and that is worth a lot of money as well. Though in my opinion the 9/11 show and even that OJ Simpson guy suspected from murdering his wife, driving on the freeway and trailed by colonnes of police cars were better television.




Politesub53 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 5:28:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

Mm. On the other hand this does provide hundreds of millions of people with a lengthy amusement 'reality' show, and that is worth a lot of money as well. Though in my opinion the 9/11 show and even that OJ Simpson guy suspected from murdering his wife, driving on the freeway and trailed by colonnes of police cars were better television.


Your remarks regards 9/11 could only come from a fuckwit such as yourself, considering the thread topic..




Rule -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 5:30:52 PM)

I thank you for the compliment: I am proud to be a fuckwit.




Hillwilliam -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/19/2013 6:08:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

: I am proud to be a fuckwit.

Good thing.[8|]




tweakabelle -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 5:03:30 AM)

quote:

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?


Come on Aswad. You know better than that.

Please excuse my cynicism but it was a perfect scenario for the modern surveillance State, the one that has trashed so many of our rights in order to protect those rights, to show in real time just how it is all for our own good ......

Was any one else astonished at the speed with which a major American city was militarized and turned into a virtual battleground populated only by armed units of the State ? It's not like these are the first two "armed and dangerous" thugs US Authorities have had to face.

Some people here have expressed concern at the purchase of APCs by Homeland Security. I am beginning to see what they are worried about.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 6:33:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?

Come on Aswad. You know better than that.

Please excuse my cynicism but it was a perfect scenario for the modern surveillance State, the one that has trashed so many of our rights in order to protect those rights, to show in real time just how it is all for our own good ......

Was any one else astonished at the speed with which a major American city was militarized and turned into a virtual battleground populated only by armed units of the State ? It's not like these are the first two "armed and dangerous" thugs US Authorities have had to face.

so they were just common armed & dangerous thugs wit no prospect of creating another disaster area & tha state was just doing it for a pr exercise in militaristic control of civil areas?




JeffBC -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 7:20:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Some people here have expressed concern at the purchase of APCs by Homeland Security. I am beginning to see what they are worried about.

yeah... that.

I'd rather have my freedom. I'd rather have a constitution with rights that both parties honor. I can live with the occasional nutjob doing something bad. I can't live with a police state... especially not one armed with modern tools of surveillance which make Orwell's nightmare seem like a children's story.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 11:28:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Some people here have expressed concern at the purchase of APCs by Homeland Security. I am beginning to see what they are worried about.

yeah... that.

I'd rather have my freedom. I'd rather have a constitution with rights that both parties honor. I can live with the occasional nutjob doing something bad. I can't live with a police state... especially not one armed with modern tools of surveillance which make Orwell's nightmare seem like a children's story.

what specific rights were breached by tha search for tha suspects & if there were violations how do they contribute to yr fears tha US is becoming a police state?




Owner59 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 11:37:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

: I am proud to be a fuckwit.

Good thing.[8|]



This.....




Moonhead -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 12:11:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?


Come on Aswad. You know better than that.

Please excuse my cynicism but it was a perfect scenario for the modern surveillance State, the one that has trashed so many of our rights in order to protect those rights, to show in real time just how it is all for our own good ......

Was any one else astonished at the speed with which a major American city was militarized and turned into a virtual battleground populated only by armed units of the State ? It's not like these are the first two "armed and dangerous" thugs US Authorities have had to face.

Some people here have expressed concern at the purchase of APCs by Homeland Security. I am beginning to see what they are worried about.

Where were all these badass armed manly self sufficient Americans locally while all of this was going on, anyway?
Hiding under their beds, pissing themselves?




Aswad -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 4:57:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Come on Aswad. You know better than that.


Yes, but questions share better than silence.

quote:

I am beginning to see what they are worried about.


If you're not joking, then welcome to my thoughts circa 2001, and enjoy the bumpy ride ahead. It's mostly downhill.

IWYW,
— Aswad.





Level -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/20/2013 5:06:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

Is there no better way to deal with this than to lock down everything and call in every gun around?


Come on Aswad. You know better than that.

Please excuse my cynicism but it was a perfect scenario for the modern surveillance State, the one that has trashed so many of our rights in order to protect those rights, to show in real time just how it is all for our own good ......

Was any one else astonished at the speed with which a major American city was militarized and turned into a virtual battleground populated only by armed units of the State ? It's not like these are the first two "armed and dangerous" thugs US Authorities have had to face.

Some people here have expressed concern at the purchase of APCs by Homeland Security. I am beginning to see what they are worried about.

Where were all these badass armed manly self sufficient Americans locally while all of this was going on, anyway?
Hiding under their beds, pissing themselves?



I wonder what the gun laws are like in Massachusetts; it's one of the more liberal states...

Also, even us gun-toting manly men are law abiding, and not wanting to get in the pros way.
[:D]




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875