LadyPact -> RE: Train your slave???? (4/29/2013 12:18:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SeverinVim One thing that really bothers me about the conceit of "domination" in this context is the idea that, somehow, you can "dominate" people without hardly even knowing them. I don't understand the desire to plunge into things like that, at all. It makes no sense to me. I understand that this is an "alternative" Web site, but isn't there a better, slower, more sane way of doing things? I have a question in reply and then maybe I can help with yours. Did you happen to put in the word "conceit" in the post when you had intended the word "concept" or did you literally mean the word conceit, as in thinking too much of one's self? Your post is really one of the reasons why I prefer the term topping for do-er and do-ee situations, even if whatever the participants are doing has the illusion of control of one person over the other. When I write here or have these kinds of conversations in the community, I pretty much stick to the terms top and bottom for any kind of casual play or in situations where I know there isn't a dynamic present. Sure, there's a better way for you if I'm getting the right impression of what you are saying for yourself in your question. You might not be the kind of person who wants to engage in casual play and be interested only in participating in certain activities with those you know very well and who you trust. Nothing wrong with that. There are a lot of people who only play within the context of a relationship.
|
|
|
|