Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science

Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

kalikshama -> Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/30/2013 7:46:21 PM)
Fox Business personalities had a collective freak out on Wednesday night after learning that mothers were now the primary source of income in 40 percent of U.S. households. Fox Business host Lou Dobbs asserted women earning more than their husbands was an indication of the dissolution of American society. Fox News political analyst Juan Williams agreed, describing it as a sign of the disintegration of marriage that would have negative consequences for generations to come. Fox News contributor Erick Erickson went one step further, saying nature itself commanded that women be subservient to men. “I’m so used to liberals telling conservatives that they’re anti-science,” Erickson explained. “But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology, when you look at the natural world, the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, it’s not antithesis, or it’s not competing, it’s a complimentary role.” “We as people in a smart society have lost the ability to have complimentary relationships in nuclear families, and it is tearing us apart,” he continued, adding that “reality showed” it was harmful for women to be the primary source of income in a family. Fox News contributor Doug Schoen concluded the freak out by claiming all these so-called breadwinner moms “could undermine our social order.” Watch video, via Media Matters

kalikshama -> Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 7:49:50 PM)
The Bible makes it clear that men were designed to go out and work while women stay home, according to conservative Christian radio host Bryan Fischer. Reacting to news that mothers were now the primary source of income in 40 percent of U.S. households, Fischer claimed Wednesday that men were “designed to be breadwinners for their families.” “That’s the way God set it up, that’s the way he designed it,” he continued. “Husbands are to use their stamina and their strength and their brainpower — not that they’re smarter than women, I’m not saying that — but God has given them a brain and the purpose for using their mental ability is to provide for their families.” Women, on the other hand, were designed to focus on “making a home for her children and for her husband.” Fisher also warned that men’s self-esteem was dependent upon their success as breadwiners. A wife that earned more money than her husband was a recipe for marital turmoil, he warned. Watch video

searching4mysir -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 7:50:46 PM)
Guess the radio host never read Proverbs 31:10-31. LOL quote: A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies. Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value. She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life. She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands. She is like the merchant ships, bringing her food from afar. She gets up while it is still night; she provides food for her family and portions for her female servants. She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard. She sets about her work vigorously; her arms are strong for her tasks. She sees that her trading is profitable, and her lamp does not go out at night. In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers. She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy. When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet. She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple. Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. She makes linen garments and sells them, and supplies the merchants with sashes. She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come. She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue. She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness. Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her: “Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all.” Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised. Honor her for all that her hands have done, and let her works bring her praise at the city gate. She is a land owner/real estate investor as well as a business owner (selling linen garments). She does this on top of household duties.

FrostedFlake -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 7:58:18 PM)
The fellow has a time machine.

tazzygirl -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 8:01:42 PM)
Pay a decent, livable wage and women could stay home if they wanted too.

RomanticRebel -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 8:17:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Pay a decent, livable wage and women could stay home if they wanted too. Or watch as the middle class explodes, crime rates go way down, and the economy booms. Somehow I doubt most women would stop working(which is not a bad thing).

tj444 -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/30/2013 8:21:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama Fisher also warned that men’s self-esteem was dependent upon their success as breadwiners. A wife that earned more money than her husband was a recipe for marital turmoil, he warned. All the wife has to do is tell her hubby what a magnificient cock he has and how great it feels.. end of problem.. [:D]

Moonhead -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 9:10:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama “I’m so used to liberals telling conservatives that they’re anti-science,” Erickson explained. “But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology, when you look at the natural world, the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role." If he seriously believes that, small wonder liberals tell him he's anti science. He probably thinks that lions are running the pride and drones running the hive.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 9:21:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama Fox Business personalities had a collective freak out on Wednesday night after learning that mothers were now the primary source of income in 40 percent of U.S. households. Why are they so fucking dense that they can't figure out that a significant number of those households don't have a male anywhere around? Of COURSE the female is the fucking breadwinner in those cases. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/the-number-of-children-living-in-single-parent-homes-has-nearly-doubled-in/ From the above. "Today, one-third of American children – a total of 15 million – are being raised without a father."

Rule -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/31/2013 9:26:02 AM)
Females have always worked, often at home, or on the fields. Cottage industry. The pagan Goddess Frau Holle was insistent that females work at the loom, so that they could support themselves and had savings when they got too old to work.

kiwisub12 -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/31/2013 9:42:56 AM)
Good grief. Actually , if the men in charge (politicians) hadn't started world war two, women quite possibly would still be at home, wondering if this was all there was to life - cleaning toilets and lying to their husbands about how manly they are. As i recall from the bible, there were always working women - traditional meaning, and other nontraditional roles - like gleaning. Just because some of the women didn't get money for their work, didn't mean they weren't supporting their households.

eulero83 -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/31/2013 10:12:45 AM)
where did he had this biology lessons? at a creationist museum?

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 10:59:12 AM)
I just watched that commentary and it made me shudder. The basic gist of it seemed to be that women should strive to do less so men can feel better about themselves (?!) This Fox commentary is just too weird. What do they expect in a society where over half of all college degrees are awarded to women? And if you spin out their position - they basically seem to be saying that the past 150 (if not more) years of history should just be rolled back and we should return to a time where women received no education, could not work out of the home at well-paying jobs, moved directly from their father's home to their husband's, and spent their lives taking care of their husbands and kids (oh forget that last point, women still do that). While we're at it, why don't we just cover women up as well? What is also interesting about this commentary is that it completely ignores the fact that lower class women (and this would include most women of color in the U.S), historically, were often working (as domestics, farm labor etc.) Conservatives yet again revealing themselves to only care about the interests of wealthy white men. I wonder if they have even half a clue of how stupid they look. Which brings me to my next point. If this is what most women have to work with - well, no wonder they're doing better than the men.....just sayin'......

thompsonx -> RE: Christian radio host upset by female breadwinners: Women not designed to be providers. (5/31/2013 11:40:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Pay a decent, livable wage and women could stay home if they wanted too. What is union scale?

eulero83 -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 11:43:47 AM)
I don't know if it's about caring the rich's over the poor's interest, probably he just was raised in that kind of family. The problem is I think he would say every bullshit that came in his mind to prove a point, he just proved to be as ignorant as a frozen pea, it's not that if you talk randomly about biology makes it a scientific discussion, just thinking that natural world is composed only by some species of big animals living in a pack is a mistake, but even taking as hypothesys that only vertebrates exist vertebrates (that are by the way the minority of animal species) but I can make examples where the male and female meet have a one night stand and the female raises prole by her own, like bears, or where a single male has an harem of females to fuck and when a yunger male beats the hit out of him takes the females, I don't think if a serial rapist came in his home with a baseball bat uses his head as ball and then fuck his wife he would define it as natural behaviour.

Charles6682 -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 1:41:35 PM)
I don't get my news from Fox News. There is nothing "fair and balanced" about Fox news. Its no secret that Fox news is a "right wing" Conservative news station. I use to at least watch Fox news to try to see a different side to the news. I got sick of always hearing the clearly 1 sided view that is Fox News. This isn't a professional news company. Rather just a bunch of "right wingers" complaining all day and spewing lies on purpose, just to please their "base".

Lucylastic -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 2:08:11 PM)
bunch of neanderthals how surprising http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/30/erick-erickson-some-women-believe-they-can-have/194277 http://entertainment.time.com/2013/05/31/foxs-megyn-kelly-alpha-dogs-working-mom-critic-erick-erickson/ Its alll the womens fault, dontcha know

Lucylastic -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 2:17:48 PM)
Then there is this twatwaffle "American family is breaking down. Women are forced to go out, be the breadwinners for families. That's why the number's skewed higher not. Here's another offshoot of that: If you are a single mom, breadwinner of the family, and you get pregnant, aren’t we pushing towards more abortions? It seems like we are." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/eric-bolling-abortion_n_3362653.html

slvemike4u -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 2:23:39 PM)
What an ass. works two ways ,don't it ?[:)][:)][:)][:)][:)]

Lucylastic -> RE: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science (5/31/2013 2:28:47 PM)
It can.... LMAO

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2026

Terms of Service

4.296875E-02