Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: explicit primary photo


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: explicit primary photo Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:35:55 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Well quit fucking around put it on your second picture, lets get a look at it and see if we want to throw you off the site, or you can switch it to primary.

Goddamm, enough fucking around.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:42:21 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case.

to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs.


Again who are YOU to say what a "serious dom" will be impressed by. You can say what YOU would be impressed by but can you honestly make a general statement that speaks for every other dom? (obviously you can but..)

And again... where did you get the idea that "impressing" a dom was my intent? Heck why would that even get factored in to what qualifies as explicit? Lmfcao



I can give an opinion about serious doms after knowing many personally.

I don't have the idea you are trying to impress Doms. Perhaps others are trying to impress Doms and the subject is very credible for that audience.

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:44:00 PM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?


For me, "no explicit photos" means no genitals or anus showing at all, this includes those that are "covered" by chastity devices or see-through garments, no penetration of any kind, including penetration by toys, and no bodily fluids/excretions except sweat and saliva.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:47:53 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		I have seen saliva pulled as well. And penetration with dildos kept... provided its done tastefully.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:48:42 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		and sucking, thats tasteful, in all respects.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:49:43 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I have seen saliva pulled as well. And penetration with dildos kept... provided its done tastefully.



I'm curious as to how saliva is explicit.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:50:39 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Because how does one prove its saliva and not cum? Instead of dealing with the argument, it simply goes.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 6/4/2013 1:51:03 PM >

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:50:46 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and sucking, thats tasteful, in all respects.



Especially if its you getting sucked huh?

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:50:54 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		I dont see anything wrong with them.  But I aint your average motherfucker. Which  # were you thinking of making primary?

You prolly cant use the one with the guys sealclubber in there as your primary.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 6/4/2013 1:54:47 PM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:53:56 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Because how does one prove its saliva and not cum? Instead of dealing with the argument, it simply goes.



So basically there is no stead fast determination (other than the obvious) what is explicit and what isn't? So one mod could find it perfectly okay while another may pull it.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:55:28 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan
For me, "no explicit photos" means no genitals or anus showing at all, this includes those that are "covered" by chastity devices or see-through garments, no penetration of any kind, including penetration by toys, and no bodily fluids/excretions except sweat and saliva.
I agree with this.

As to others who assumed the primary photo was supposed to be appealing to Doms, from being familiar with LilSquaw and her posts, that wouldn't have been My first assumption that she wanted for the pic. I'd have said that she wanted the pic to be a reflection of something she enjoys and/or something that showed a reality based shot of one of her scenes. Since she does photo/video shoots often, I'm thinking she would like to have that side displayed, rather than it supposedly be used for imaginary 'seeking' when she already has a primary partner.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:56:53 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I dont see anything wrong with them.  But I aint your average motherfucker. Which  # were you thinking of making primary?

You prolly cant use the one with the guys sealclubber in there as your primary.





Seal Clubber? hehehe
That a cute term!

I changed it, guess time will tell.
I didn't use one with his seal clubber showing even though it wasn't in your face.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 1:59:57 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		What you guys think?  May not get alotta subbing jobs after this, but WTF? , Hah?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:03:52 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact




As to others who assumed the primary photo was supposed to be appealing to Doms, from being familiar with LilSquaw and her posts, that wouldn't have been My first assumption that she wanted for the pic. I'd have said that she wanted the pic to be a reflection of something she enjoys and/or something that showed a reality based shot of one of her scenes. Since she does photo/video shoots often, I'm thinking she would like to have that side displayed, rather than it supposedly be used for imaginary 'seeking' when she already has a primary partner.





LP you are totally correct. :)






< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/4/2013 2:08:01 PM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:05:16 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw
I didn't use one with his seal clubber showing even though it wasn't in your face.


Well if you had sort of covered it up some, maybe say....with your mouth, it might have been acceptable.  Dunno. 

And as for mine?  That the maximum they could charge me with would  be decent exposure

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 6/4/2013 2:06:38 PM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:06:57 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

What you guys think?  May not get alotta subbing jobs after this, but WTF? , Hah?



Lol Posting a picture that is seen as dominant or submissive can always kill it for switches. Personally I don't see activities as dominant or submissive but eh.. my mileage varies from many people.

ETA: I have a picture with his seal clubber hidden with my mouth on the other site. To ME that isn't explicit but that is why I asked my original question.

< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/4/2013 2:10:05 PM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:11:31 PM   
lizi


Posts: 4673
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline 		Totally off topic....eeep! Holy cow girl, you look amazing! Congrats on the weight loss!! Geez, I hadn't peeked at you for a while, I honestly hardly recognized you. Great job

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:16:03 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi

Totally off topic....eeep! Holy cow girl, you look amazing! Congrats on the weight loss!! Geez, I hadn't peeked at you for a while, I honestly hardly recognized you. Great job



Thank you!
May sound odd but EVERY time I see a new picture or video I have the same reaction. Like holy shit... is that really me? When I look at older and new pictures side by side it doesn't even look like the same person. (to me)

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to lizi)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:20:47 PM   
CynthiaWVirginia


Posts: 1915
Joined: 2/28/2010
From: West Virginia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Another question.....
If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?


No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted.

I was surprised to find out that anus pix were okay, even with butt plugs in them, but that penis and/or scrotum in the primary pic was not. (Mod21 said something about it in the boards a year or two ago when several of us were complaining about a guy with an "impaled butthole" primary pic.)

Pussy pix were okay, as long as it's not of a gaping vaginal hole (not talking about gaping vulva cuz labia majora are spread open), and/or with cum dripping all over it. Urine, cum shots, vomit, and bowel movement pix don't stay up for long, but I've seen ones with a little blood staying up.

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:24:46 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

quote:

Another question.....
If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?


No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted.

I was surprised to find out that anus pix were okay, even with butt plugs in them, but that penis and/or scrotum in the primary pic was not. (Mod21 said something about it in the boards a year or two ago when several of us were complaining about a guy with an "impaled butthole" primary pic.)

Pussy pix were okay, as long as it's not of a gaping vaginal hole (not talking about gaping vulva cuz labia majora are spread open), and/or with cum dripping all over it. Urine, cum shots, vomit, and bowel movement pix don't stay up for long, but I've seen ones with a little blood staying up.



I've seen blood ones as a primary.
I always thought anal plugs was out for primary. (wow)

So a picture of a woman standing nude is fine but a picture of a guy standing nude will probably get pulled?


ETA: I admit more than before I think the term explicit is broad and is open to a lot of interpretation.

< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/4/2013 2:27:07 PM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to CynthiaWVirginia)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: explicit primary photo Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109