Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dom is different


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Dom is different Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 12:05:46 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Actually cheating could be defined as a kink.

Really? I'd love to hear how this works by definition. Next, the color green is going to be a kink.


quote:

I don't condone cheating, I did it. I also came clean to my husband, who agreed to let me see my dom, to make me happy. I also after much thought don't condone that either. I stopped that. He didn't stop it, the dom didn't stop it, I did.

Considering how that was going, I can't say I blame you. Then again, that's a whole different gig.


quote:

Married, is married, is married. Vows are vows. One can try to make certain things ok in all kinds of ways in their mind, but basically if one is married, and is having sex beyond their marriage whether with consent or not, it is still cheating.

I just went and got a simple dictionary definition. Here it is for you:

Verb
Act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination: "she cheats at cards".
Noun
A person who behaves dishonestly in order to gain an advantage.

Please feel free to try some other sources if you'd like. Let Me know when you find one that has the word "honesty" as a part of it.


quote:

I would call that not working on the problem. I would also call it, I am bored with my wife or husband so I go get my jollies elsewhere. If one is getting sex outside of their marriage, I don't care how one tries to label it or spice up the truth. The fact is if someone is added to the relationship, boredom as set in, the spouse is not fulfilling and instead of working on THAT PROBLEM, one or both go outside the marriage. Lovely words of understanding, cloaking truths, makes it beautiful? IT is laughable to me when another sits on a supposed moral high horse, when their condition is not even moral. Ludicrious. Keep preaching it, but it will never be true.
DId the relationship always need additons, or did that come later? hmmmm. points to ponder.

This is probably one of the most ignorant statements on the entire thread. Here's a different way to do this.

My husband likes to play golf. I don't like playing golf. Just because we're married doesn't mean he has to give up golf. We've agreed that he'll play golf with other people. He doesn't have to lie to Me to tell Me that he's playing golf because I know it's an activity that he enjoys. It doesn't mean that when we play a game together that it is somehow less or lacking in some way. When we play different games together, it's awesome. When he plays with other people, that's awesome, too.


quote:

What a good friend, who sits in judgement. When troubles arise, they leave their friends side. Blah. Was this suppose to be impressive?

Actually, I kind of thought it was. It's a statement that says she only wants a certain level of character of the people that she chooses to have in her life. If she had said the same thing about another type of unethical behavior, like theft when it was about stealing items that weren't necessary to survival, would there be complaints that isn't the type of person that somebody wants in their life, too? How many people to you associate with that tell you they shoplift on a regular basis?


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I think this has happened before, a long time ago. A really long time ago. People don't have to agree, but there is a difference between judging & bashing, and guidance and steering. ITs perfectly okay to tell someone I do not agree with your actions, but to bash them is not right. Using the internet as an excuse to simply disregard there is a person on the other side, is no excuse at all.

There's an incorrect assumption being made here that what's being said on the net is somehow different than what a person would say in the physical world. That's not the case for everybody. I won't speak for anybody else, but I've absolutely tossed people from My life because they didn't know how to have honest relationships. No problem telling them straight to their face, either.


quote:

The only human who should throw stones are those who have lived a perfectly moral life, and there isn't one person on the face of this earth, who can say that. And if there was a human who could say it, they would chose not to throw stones.

Baloney. Personally, I wouldn't shed a tear over whipping rocks at rapists, murderers, and various other low life type people. I'm not big on those who intentionally harm others. Here's the beauty of that. It probably makes Me somebody who you wouldn't want in your life because of the way I see things. Guess what? That makes you just as judgmental of the way I choose to live as you are condemning other people for. You don't want people in your life that are judgmental. I don't want people in My life that are dishonest. Which is better or worse than the other?

quote:

People make mistakes. People made decisions yesterday they would not make today. What one person learns at 20 another is taught at 40. People do change too.

That's great. They can be a part of My life when they grow up.


quote:

When people speak the truth, whether good or bad, they do out themselves out there to be judged. I see a lot of bitterness and uncalled for remarks many times. When I came here for the first time, I did go crazy on people, and they got exactly everything they said I was as they said it. Did I do it because I was the devils spawn? NO I did it because I acted like the person I was labeled as. I felt like a whipping post. I imagine you know how that feels, right? SInce you admittingly use your body as one. I find that horrible. I find it horrible that someone has lost themselves so much, they have to have someone think for them too.
If we are ranking cheaters and pedophiles in the same group, lets add loss of self and abuse to body to it.

I think people are responsible for their own feelings. Sometimes, when people come here and they show that they are the type of person who already has guilt because of what they are doing, it really sucks for them when people happen to agree with the foundations of that guilt. When they don't get the free pass that they expected, they want to blame the people that wouldn't give them one. That's far more rooted in the person themselves.

Depending on how a person has set their own ethical standards, unless they don't give a shit about honesty as a value, I find it highly unlikely that most folks feel they are being the best person they can be when they are living a life of deceit. When people give them a mirror to look into, they don't like what they see. Otherwise, other people wouldn't have that much of an impact.


quote:

No bashing here, no judgment, just stating my opinion in a very outward way. Lets see how well it is received. I should get thankful responses maybe? Surely one should be thankful for this direct opinion and view.

It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 1:40:09 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered

.......and this post of mine must have really struck a cord for you since you felt the need to dissect it or you wouldn't have felt so compelled to do so. Note the bolded print, of your own words. Ironic.

It was my own opinion and story, I don't particularly care if you agree or not, anymore then if you care if I agree with you or not. I wasn't addressing you btw, and I don't feel the need to be right or know it all. Carry on. You can have your own right in your own life. sadist or whatever. Doesn't matter to me.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 3:46:45 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
Dear Cuteness2472,
You asked for a Dom's perspective in your OP and you got very few real answers. So after reading about your worries that the man you are seeing isn't paying enough attention to you, I will give you some direct answers. I am one of the old farts and I have seen a lot, you and your situation is very stereotypical and the solutions are simple if you are strong enough for some personal growth.

"we finally met up last week and since then he hasn't pursued me the way he did"
First of all, it may be your clingy attitude. You don't seem well versed at BDSM so I will explain. You refer to him possessively, which is a strange thing to do whether you are the other woman or not. If my girl said, "I am new and have had my Dom for two months" she would spend an hour on the whipping post and not in a good way. He is not your possession and you have not "had him", he has you! He is supposed to be in the position of control akin to ownership, treat him with that respect and his interest level may change. The case may be that to him you seemed like hot stuff when he was chasing you. Then when he did connect with you in person, you got possessive which changed the dynamic and your level of appeal.

The reality is you guys are both seeing other people, your spouses, so when you "hook up" I presume it is for BDSM and sex. I ask if you are both planning to leave your spouses and carry on a romantic D/s relationship or is this what you called it, a "hook up" for some hot Dom/sub sex? With that perspective I give you this from my vast 40 years of Domly experience. Sometimes I see submissives that aren't well versed in in BDSM, life or relationships who surrender the pussy and suddenly think they are part of a couple, a relationship, part of my life. One girl, after a sex date which was our first meeting, told me she was originally scheduled to go to a party with some other guy but "after last night (with me)" she canceled the date. What the hell? I distanced myself quickly and ran like the wind. We weren't together, she has no claim on me and I don't care who else she goes with. It was a sex date between a Dominant and a submissive. Being that you both obviously "see other people" and are having sex dates, perhaps your possessive attitude made him distance himself like I would have.

"I have told him he has apologized. Told him how I felt."
To me that sounds like you are trying to guilt him into chasing you harder, otherwise you would have not mentioned that "he has apologized". For example:

1) if my girl was standing on my toe, I would say, "please stand over there". She would say "yes sir".
2) "ouch, you are hurting me by standing on my toe". In which case she would "apologize".

So which approach is more constructive? Which approach is manipulative emotional blackmail? If when you express yourself to your partner, even a hook up partner, and the responses you get are apologies when what you really want is for them to pursue you, you are doing it wrong.

. . . My advice, pull your claws out and let him breath. Maybe he will get a chance to pursue you again when you let go. Be the submissive you were that attracted him in the first place. He probably already has a clingy wife which is why he is looking elsewhere in the first place.

< Message edited by ResidentSadist -- 6/16/2013 3:47:45 PM >


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to Cuteness2472)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 4:28:27 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered

.......and this post of mine must have really struck a cord for you since you felt the need to dissect it or you wouldn't have felt so compelled to do so. Note the bolded print, of your own words. Ironic.

It was my own opinion and story, I don't particularly care if you agree or not, anymore then if you care if I agree with you or not. I wasn't addressing you btw, and I don't feel the need to be right or know it all. Carry on. You can have your own right in your own life. sadist or whatever. Doesn't matter to me.

It's not dissecting. It's called old woman who breaks up portions of the post to address them properly. Particularly after a rather late night.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 7:00:00 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
Well being that most people who know me know my lifestyle and have never once treated me as a "pervert" or worse and we are monogamous, I guess I'm ok with judging those who cheat. And yeah, those who cheat, yup...one of the lowest forms on the planet as far as I'm concerned.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to slaveluci)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 7:05:01 PM   
slaveluci


Posts: 4294
Joined: 3/2/2007
From: Little Rock, AR
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Well being that most people who know me know my lifestyle and have never once treated me as a "pervert" or worse and we are monogamous, I guess I'm ok with judging those who cheat. And yeah, those who cheat, yup...one of the lowest forms on the planet as far as I'm concerned.


Sure you're ok with judging those who cheat. They're worse than murderers apparently. And I am OK with judging arrogant, self-inflated Honorable folks who believe they get a pass just because they aren't technically, by their own definition, cheating. You skimmed my entire post and came back with only one more affirmation of why you are right. Typical, and of not only you. That's why some get pilloried for their behavior and the ones the majority likes get away with egregious bullshit with no second thought. Damn, what a double standard. But that's the norm. Death to cheaters!!!!

luci

_____________________________

To choose a good book, look in an inquisitor’s prohibited list. ~John Aikin

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 7:25:51 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Nobody said death to anybody. I did say that it's something that I don't find acceptable in My life and it's not a trait of others that I want in My life.

Personally, for all of the talk that folks do around this joint about behaviors that they find unacceptable, I always find it odd that some can't understand that some people do put lying to their spouse and/or cheating on that particular list. The closest that I can come to that one is theft because some people see that as not acceptable and other people don't mind it a whole lot.

As to other things in the post, I guess I see it somewhat the same. If that whole 5-10 minutes is the truth (remember, we are talking, at least partially about honesty) some people may not like it, but it is still honesty. Some may not be willing to feign waving and moaning when there is none to be had. I guess that would invite some to bitch about the other person. If you find it unethical *not* to have emotional ties to somebody after a relationship or association ends, I'd be interested in hearing it. I could certainly get it if it was described as cold or unfeeling to some, but I'd invite you to share why it's unethical.

Now, personally, I've never had to deal with being cheated on. I have had situations where I've had reason to lose all trust that I've had for another person and I can say, at least for Me, I know what that does as far as killing trust. No trust for Me equals a lack of positive emotion for another person. I can absolutely see how cheating on somebody could do that to a relationship. So, how come it's ok for the spouses of these folks to potentially have to go through that?

For what it's worth, it's not just cheating that is up pretty high on the list as far as unethical crap. I happen to think that folks who intentionally out others is pretty scummy behavior, too. Next time we have a thread on that, are we going to see the same folks defending that as well?


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to slaveluci)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Dom is different - 6/16/2013 7:45:06 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
skimmed? Yup. There really wasn't much of interest in it.

And if I felt I was doing something wrong with my life or felt I did something in my past that I was highly unethical then I wouldn't feel the way I do but no I've never cheated on anyone, I don't lie to people, I don't hurt those close to me. And yeah, murderers are right up there too but being that the person is dead and they are no longer being hurt, I can't really say I see it as awful as hurting someone that will hurt and damage them for the rest of their life. That cheating will stick with them and cause their entire life to change and not usually in a good way, not even close. At least when you're dead....you're dead.

Now if nothing I say is ok with you then oh well. Such is life. I'm not here to make you feel good.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 9:11:02 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14414
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

What a good friend, who sits in judgement. When troubles arise, they leave their friends side. Blah. Was this suppose to be impressive?

Actually, I kind of thought it was. It's a statement that says she only wants a certain level of character of the people that she chooses to have in her life. If she had said the same thing about another type of unethical behavior, like theft when it was about stealing items that weren't necessary to survival, would there be complaints that isn't the type of person that somebody wants in their life, too? How many people to you associate with that tell you they shoplift on a regular basis?


You nailed LP. (All of it but I didn't want to make a massive quote)

But another point, I chose to walk away to show support for the innocent people that were going to be hurt rather than supporting the cheater. I didn't walk away from a friend with troubles. I stayed by her side and provided a shoulder while she had "troubles". The moment she decided that her orgasms came before the needs of her children, I walked away.

If she drove with her kids in the car while drunk you'd tar and feather her, but since she's only willing to do permanent psychological damage, I should be supportive.







< Message edited by OsideGirl -- 6/17/2013 9:24:49 AM >


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 10:41:47 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
~FR~

Don't care about the innocent people that are being lied to, and cannot consent. Things happen all the time in day to day life that we don't consent to. I have issues with people that cheat, which means they are lying to someone. People that lie over their relationship will rationalize and justify other forms of dishonesty, up to and including theft. In general they are a dishonest person. If my friends cheat, they are no longer a friend as I cannot trust them.

The crux that I believe most have is that people that cheat are pretty much a scum bag because of the dishonesty. Really does there need to be any other reason than that? Not sure how anyone can defend people that exhibit that level of dishonesty.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 1:19:24 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Actually cheating could be defined as a kink.

Really? I'd love to hear how this works by definition. Next, the color green is going to be a kink.


quote:

I don't condone cheating, I did it. I also came clean to my husband, who agreed to let me see my dom, to make me happy. I also after much thought don't condone that either. I stopped that. He didn't stop it, the dom didn't stop it, I did.

Considering how that was going, I can't say I blame you. Then again, that's a whole different gig.


quote:

Married, is married, is married. Vows are vows. One can try to make certain things ok in all kinds of ways in their mind, but basically if one is married, and is having sex beyond their marriage whether with consent or not, it is still cheating.

I just went and got a simple dictionary definition. Here it is for you:

Verb
Act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination: "she cheats at cards".
Noun
A person who behaves dishonestly in order to gain an advantage.

Please feel free to try some other sources if you'd like. Let Me know when you find one that has the word "honesty" as a part of it.


quote:

I would call that not working on the problem. I would also call it, I am bored with my wife or husband so I go get my jollies elsewhere. If one is getting sex outside of their marriage, I don't care how one tries to label it or spice up the truth. The fact is if someone is added to the relationship, boredom as set in, the spouse is not fulfilling and instead of working on THAT PROBLEM, one or both go outside the marriage. Lovely words of understanding, cloaking truths, makes it beautiful? IT is laughable to me when another sits on a supposed moral high horse, when their condition is not even moral. Ludicrious. Keep preaching it, but it will never be true.
DId the relationship always need additons, or did that come later? hmmmm. points to ponder.

This is probably one of the most ignorant statements on the entire thread. Here's a different way to do this.

My husband likes to play golf. I don't like playing golf. Just because we're married doesn't mean he has to give up golf. We've agreed that he'll play golf with other people. He doesn't have to lie to Me to tell Me that he's playing golf because I know it's an activity that he enjoys. It doesn't mean that when we play a game together that it is somehow less or lacking in some way. When we play different games together, it's awesome. When he plays with other people, that's awesome, too.


quote:

What a good friend, who sits in judgement. When troubles arise, they leave their friends side. Blah. Was this suppose to be impressive?

Actually, I kind of thought it was. It's a statement that says she only wants a certain level of character of the people that she chooses to have in her life. If she had said the same thing about another type of unethical behavior, like theft when it was about stealing items that weren't necessary to survival, would there be complaints that isn't the type of person that somebody wants in their life, too? How many people to you associate with that tell you they shoplift on a regular basis?


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I think this has happened before, a long time ago. A really long time ago. People don't have to agree, but there is a difference between judging & bashing, and guidance and steering. ITs perfectly okay to tell someone I do not agree with your actions, but to bash them is not right. Using the internet as an excuse to simply disregard there is a person on the other side, is no excuse at all.

There's an incorrect assumption being made here that what's being said on the net is somehow different than what a person would say in the physical world. That's not the case for everybody. I won't speak for anybody else, but I've absolutely tossed people from My life because they didn't know how to have honest relationships. No problem telling them straight to their face, either.


quote:

The only human who should throw stones are those who have lived a perfectly moral life, and there isn't one person on the face of this earth, who can say that. And if there was a human who could say it, they would chose not to throw stones.

Baloney. Personally, I wouldn't shed a tear over whipping rocks at rapists, murderers, and various other low life type people. I'm not big on those who intentionally harm others. Here's the beauty of that. It probably makes Me somebody who you wouldn't want in your life because of the way I see things. Guess what? That makes you just as judgmental of the way I choose to live as you are condemning other people for. You don't want people in your life that are judgmental. I don't want people in My life that are dishonest. Which is better or worse than the other?

quote:

People make mistakes. People made decisions yesterday they would not make today. What one person learns at 20 another is taught at 40. People do change too.

That's great. They can be a part of My life when they grow up.


quote:

When people speak the truth, whether good or bad, they do out themselves out there to be judged. I see a lot of bitterness and uncalled for remarks many times. When I came here for the first time, I did go crazy on people, and they got exactly everything they said I was as they said it. Did I do it because I was the devils spawn? NO I did it because I acted like the person I was labeled as. I felt like a whipping post. I imagine you know how that feels, right? SInce you admittingly use your body as one. I find that horrible. I find it horrible that someone has lost themselves so much, they have to have someone think for them too.
If we are ranking cheaters and pedophiles in the same group, lets add loss of self and abuse to body to it.

I think people are responsible for their own feelings. Sometimes, when people come here and they show that they are the type of person who already has guilt because of what they are doing, it really sucks for them when people happen to agree with the foundations of that guilt. When they don't get the free pass that they expected, they want to blame the people that wouldn't give them one. That's far more rooted in the person themselves.

Depending on how a person has set their own ethical standards, unless they don't give a shit about honesty as a value, I find it highly unlikely that most folks feel they are being the best person they can be when they are living a life of deceit. When people give them a mirror to look into, they don't like what they see. Otherwise, other people wouldn't have that much of an impact.


quote:

No bashing here, no judgment, just stating my opinion in a very outward way. Lets see how well it is received. I should get thankful responses maybe? Surely one should be thankful for this direct opinion and view.

It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered.



Holy shit. This is a crushingly terrific response.
Standing O


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 2:47:59 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered

.......and this post of mine must have really struck a cord for you since you felt the need to dissect it or you wouldn't have felt so compelled to do so. Note the bolded print, of your own words. Ironic.

It was my own opinion and story, I don't particularly care if you agree or not, anymore then if you care if I agree with you or not. I wasn't addressing you btw, and I don't feel the need to be right or know it all. Carry on. You can have your own right in your own life. sadist or whatever. Doesn't matter to me.

It's not dissecting. It's called old woman who breaks up portions of the post to address them properly. Particularly after a rather late night.



Whereas some might call it "divide and conquer" strategy.

That if you break it into small enough pieces, not only does it affect context, the entire theme of the overall post is destroyed.

Of course, some aren't as suspicious of other people's motives like I am....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 3:54:58 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

It has nothing to do with thanking you for it. I happen to be a sadist. If you find that sadism is unethical, I'd encourage you not to engage in it. However, you thinking it's not ethical isn't an issue for Me. Neither is you thinking poly isn't ethical because the opinions of Myself and My husband on the matter far outweigh yours. That's part of the difference. If I actually agreed that you were right on the matter, it might bother Me. Since I don't feel that way, what you've had to say is inconsequential. Had the OP honestly believed she wasn't doing anything wrong, none of the comments about her cheating would have mattered

.......and this post of mine must have really struck a cord for you since you felt the need to dissect it or you wouldn't have felt so compelled to do so. Note the bolded print, of your own words. Ironic.

It was my own opinion and story, I don't particularly care if you agree or not, anymore then if you care if I agree with you or not. I wasn't addressing you btw, and I don't feel the need to be right or know it all. Carry on. You can have your own right in your own life. sadist or whatever. Doesn't matter to me.

It's not dissecting. It's called old woman who breaks up portions of the post to address them properly. Particularly after a rather late night.



Whereas some might call it "divide and conquer" strategy.

That if you break it into small enough pieces, not only does it affect context, the entire theme of the overall post is destroyed.

Of course, some aren't as suspicious of other people's motives like I am....

Focus.


I'm not speaking for LP (Don't got balls big enough to try that) but I cut things like this all the time-generally it's so I can address each point with the consideration it deserves.
Has zip to do with altering the message. If anything, it's because I want to answer to the message in totality with the appropriate amount of care.

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Dom is different - 6/17/2013 4:11:14 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14414
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

Has zip to do with altering the message. If anything, it's because I want to answer to the message in totality with the appropriate amount of care.
Same Here.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 5:44:04 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
I have to agree cheating is a dishonest act. IT involves lying and it involves dissolving of trust. Its one of those lies that does involve a lot of corruption in a relationship, and relationships beyond the primary one too. I don't think anyone will disagree with that, not even the cheaters, who are practicing it now or have practiced it in the past. But You do realize though people lie all the time? In general the majority of the population lie everyday! In fact, if you or I aren't lying to someone else, we are lying to ourselves! You don't have to believe me, do the research. Some are just little white lies and some are big whoppers. For anyone who says they haven't lied in the last month about something, to someone else or yourself, I am have to think your lying! lol. Most people think one lie is better then another lie and their little lie doesn't affect anything, but if you think that is true, well okay. Keep living the lie!
A very ignorant warped view was stated, and I saw it a few times before, which I just had to address. If you seriously believe in your mind, that if someone has cheated, makes them a thieve, one is clearly delusional. A warped theory, that is so far in left field as much even more so then a cheater is closely compared to a pedophile.
I cheated, and not once in my entire life, NOT once, have I ever stolen. Do some cheaters also steal? Oh maybe, it might also be some disorder they have separate from the condition of their cheating, but cheating and stealing do not go hand in hand. I can compare it stupidly to myself saying " Well I don't do well in math, so I most certainly will fail in Art" or " I love to be spanked, so I most certainly will love being carved up with a knife" cause ya know I have a thing for BDSM, so If I do one thing I must want to do all of it, and have a mind for it. I certainly don't group all people who have interest in an area branded all the same, cause I would have left here long ago but there are some super polite, educated, conscientious people here who do seem to care about people they are speaking to on the other side, and do care how they word things, and they have a ton of class. And I don't think they are deviant pervs, because a lot of the world thinks that about BDSM.
It is completely ignorant in the same way to group people who have had affairs, into terrible branding and label add on's, that are lies.

Some people clearly believe obviously, on labeling and branding people on their mistakes. ANd if they are dishonest in one area, surely they are dishonest and scum in other areas. And By GOD if they make mistakes they should pay for them for eternity too.

I am so thankful I can have more faith in people, and be more open minded then that.

< Message edited by chatterbox24 -- 6/18/2013 5:53:26 AM >


_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 7:24:22 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I have to agree cheating is a dishonest act. IT involves lying and it involves dissolving of trust. Its one of those lies that does involve a lot of corruption in a relationship, and relationships beyond the primary one too. I don't think anyone will disagree with that, not even the cheaters, who are practicing it now or have practiced it in the past. But You do realize though people lie all the time? In general the majority of the population lie everyday! In fact, if you or I aren't lying to someone else, we are lying to ourselves! You don't have to believe me, do the research. Some are just little white lies and some are big whoppers. For anyone who says they haven't lied in the last month about something, to someone else or yourself, I am have to think your lying! lol. Most people think one lie is better then another lie and their little lie doesn't affect anything, but if you think that is true, well okay. Keep living the lie!


The "all lies are equal" defense is bullshit. If I lie and say something tastes good, when it does not, to be nice is not the same as "I just trashed a vow made with the highest level of trust". You can wash it any way you like, but it is not the same. That is not a lie, it is a fact of life.

quote:


A very ignorant warped view was stated, and I saw it a few times before, which I just had to address. If you seriously believe in your mind, that if someone has cheated, makes them a thieve, one is clearly delusional. A warped theory, that is so far in left field as much even more so then a cheater is closely compared to a pedophile.


Actually it is not delusional. The same level of dishonesty and deceit used when cheating, is the same used in theft. There are studies that even show that those that are dishonest in severe lies also have a tendency to steal. The level of dishonesty to cheat, to trash a solemn vow, is severe dishonesty. You can defend it all you like, but it shows your level of ethics when you do.

I call bullshit on the whole post that tries to compare all lies as the same and defends the action of dishonesty.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 7:52:48 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
But You do realize though people lie all the time? In general the majority of the population lie everyday!

I don't agree with that.
Some people lie, some don't.
Some lie by omission and not always deliberately.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
In fact, if you or I aren't lying to someone else, we are lying to ourselves! You don't have to believe me, do the research.

Are you living on the same planet as me??
Personally, I find most people are quite honest and don't lie, at least not deliberately.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Some are just little white lies and some are big whoppers. For anyone who says they haven't lied in the last month about something, to someone else or yourself, I am have to think your lying! lol.

I have never knowingly lied to anyone at any time.
Not in the last month, nor the last year, not in my whole life.
I won't even lie to save my own skin.
I have lost 2 jobs in my life because I refuse to openly lie about something that happened.

Honesty was drummed into me from a very very early age and it is a trait that I value above all else.
My parents always told me: "I don't care if you killed the neighbours dog; don't lie about it and we can work something out".
I didn't find out until my late 20's that our family crest has the motto "Vrai a la fin"(french) which means "True to the end".

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Most people think one lie is better then another lie and their little lie doesn't affect anything, but if you think that is true, well okay. Keep living the lie!

You are one of the few that seems to think this way.
I can't honestly say I have met many people who think like this.
There have been a few in my lifetime but they are, very very few by comparison.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
A very ignorant warped view was stated, and I saw it a few times before, which I just had to address. If you seriously believe in your mind, that if someone has cheated, makes them a thieve, one is clearly delusional. A warped theory, that is so far in left field as much even more so then a cheater is closely compared to a pedophile.

I regard cheaters, thieves, pedo's and liars right at the top of my "most repugnant" human traits.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I cheated, and not once in my entire life, NOT once, have I ever stolen. Do some cheaters also steal? Oh maybe, it might also be some disorder they have separate from the condition of their cheating, but cheating and stealing do not go hand in hand. I can compare it stupidly to myself saying " Well I don't do well in math, so I most certainly will fail in Art" or " I love to be spanked, so I most certainly will love being carved up with a knife" cause ya know I have a thing for BDSM, so If I do one thing I must want to do all of it, and have a mind for it.

As far as I can see, it is only you that have made the causal link between cheating and thieves.
The only reference I remebered was that LP used theft as a type of comparison - which you seem to have mis-read and used in an entirely different manner.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
It is completely ignorant in the same way to group people who have had affairs, into terrible branding and label add on's, that are lies.

People who have affairs are cheaters. Simple as that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Some people clearly believe obviously, on labeling and branding people on their mistakes. ANd if they are dishonest in one area, surely they are dishonest and scum in other areas.

So what would you a call a thief??
Some who permanently 'borrows' stuff that doesn't belong to them?
What do you call a cheater?
Someone who is taking a sabatical from their usual relationship?

Yes, some labels are important and society has many different labels for different activities.
And my own opinion is that most who indulge in such activities are often dishonest in many other areas of their lives because it's a type of mindset rather than any particular individual act.

Some things can be genuine mistakes.
But in my book, things like cheating, lying, thieving etc, is a cognative and pre-meditated act and is not a 'mistake'.

Merriam Webster
Lie [3, verb]. To make an untrue statement with intent to deceive.

Note the word 'intent'. That makes it not a mistake; it's intentional.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 10:30:54 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14414
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Some things can be genuine mistakes.
But in my book, things like cheating, lying, thieving etc, is a cognative and pre-meditated act and is not a 'mistake'.


Exactly.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 11:24:51 AM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
A couple of "white" lies:

Your wife/best friend/girlfriend (whatever) comes home crying from the hair salon, saying how awful a job they did. You tell her, "it's not that bad," or "I like it," to try to make her feel better or at the least, not nearly as upset.

Your daughter makes her first big family dinner. While she didn't burn down the house, the food really leaves much to be desired. However, you know she worked hard all day, maybe even all week, planning and preparing the meal. You pick at the food, and when she asks you why, you tell her you simply aren't that hungry.

Are you telling the truth? Of course not. Are you being dishonest? Of course you are. Is it technically with the "intent to deceive?" You betcha.

However, it is also because you want to spare someone more unnecessary hurt.

A woman I know was friends years ago with a woman who was a recovering heroin addict. Although she was no longer shooting heroin, she had the track mark scars on her arms (and I think her legs as well). They went to the beach and a little girl saw her and her scars and got frightened. The mother, seeing the woman, hurried her child away. The woman began to cry because this was, of course, upsetting to her. She was no longer a drug addict, but still people saw her that way.

My friend, trying to make her friend feel better, told her the scars were hardly noticeable. Absolutely untrue. But she said it to try to make the woman feel better. Sure she could have told her that the scars and the woman and her child's reaction were something she brought on herself, but what purpose is there to rubbing salt in the wound?

Now certainly, these are "white" lies we tell to people we care about to spare them unnecessary hurt. In the case of someone cheating on their spouse (I like Orion's "vow made with the highest level of trust" comparison) telling a bunch of people on the internet and then expecting those same strangers to "spare their feelings" in the same way? Not going to happen, nor should it.


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Dom is different - 6/18/2013 12:07:52 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
I actually made a comment that those that will lie over large things, display the same level of dishonesty that thieves do, and that they are more likely to steal. I could look up the psychology study again, but not really worth it to me to do so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

As far as I can see, it is only you that have made the causal link between cheating and thieves.
The only reference I remebered was that LP used theft as a type of comparison - which you seem to have mis-read and used in an entirely different manner.




_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Dom is different Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203