RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BitYakin -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:12:11 PM)

quote:

What I DO see is a man whining over the fact that he played a game in which he knew the rules when he started playing, who states he doesnt like the rules, yet decides to play anyway. Crying "Thats not fair" afterwards doesnt cut it.


soo what you are saying this is this is more about PUTTING ME IN MY PLACE than having a reasonable adult conversation?

and just for the record, NOO you do not see a man who played a game and decided later he didn't like the rules

I have never been nor do I expect to ever be in the situtation I am talking about

soo NO you DO NOT see a man who PLAYED THE GAME here at all, you ASSUME so because I chose to bring up a topic which I see unfairness in and ASSUME I am somehow angery cause it happened TO ME

unlike you I was just trying to have an adult conversation about a topic, and several times you have attacked my integrity with what appeared to me to be personal anger




dcnovice -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:12:22 PM)

quote:

Someone care to explain to me what the fuck abortion has to do with IRS?

The IRS tried to abort a lot of Tea Partiers' dreams of tax exemptions.




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:13:02 PM)

He was complaining because an IRS targeted a pro life group for denial of a 50something.... and he made a silly statement, which I questioned.




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:14:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

What I DO see is a man whining over the fact that he played a game in which he knew the rules when he started playing, who states he doesnt like the rules, yet decides to play anyway. Crying "Thats not fair" afterwards doesnt cut it.


soo what you are saying this is this is more about PUTTING ME IN MY PLACE than having a reasonable adult conversation?

and just for the record, NOO you do not see a man who played a game and decided later he didn't like the rules

I have never been nor do I expect to ever be in the situtation I am talking about

soo NO you DO NOT see a man who PLAYED THE GAME here at all, you ASSUME so because I chose to bring up a topic which I see unfairness in and ASSUME I am somehow angery cause it happened TO ME

unlike you I was just trying to have an adult conversation about a topic, and several times you have attacked my integrity with what appeared to me to be personal anger


You are not here to have a reasonable conversation. You are here to push your own agenda and stir up a flame war... which didnt work.




BitYakin -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:18:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

What I DO see is a man whining over the fact that he played a game in which he knew the rules when he started playing, who states he doesnt like the rules, yet decides to play anyway. Crying "Thats not fair" afterwards doesnt cut it.


soo what you are saying this is this is more about PUTTING ME IN MY PLACE than having a reasonable adult conversation?

and just for the record, NOO you do not see a man who played a game and decided later he didn't like the rules

I have never been nor do I expect to ever be in the situtation I am talking about

soo NO you DO NOT see a man who PLAYED THE GAME here at all, you ASSUME so because I chose to bring up a topic which I see unfairness in and ASSUME I am somehow angery cause it happened TO ME

unlike you I was just trying to have an adult conversation about a topic, and several times you have attacked my integrity with what appeared to me to be personal anger


You are not here to have a reasonable conversation. You are here to push your own agenda and stir up a flame war... which didnt work.



reallly??? my intent was to start a flame war?
who did I flame in my original post on this?

the ONLY one I saw impuning anyones integerty here was you impuning MINE

YOU ATTACKED me IMMEADIALTY!




DomKen -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:18:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Dads calling child support enslavement makes want to teuter them.......just for the benefit of mankind.


as always owner you try to twist it in ways its not intended. you are sooo predictable!

the POINT of what I have been saying is women are given a CHOICE, and men are NOT!

The man always has the choice. If you don't want to pay child support don't have unprotected sex. Surprisingly I don't want to have kids and I have never gotten any woman pregnant.


and women have that SAME CHOICE to say, cover it or no sex

quite tryng to pretned that every time a man an woman have sex 100% of the responsiblity for everything falls on the MAN

I never said it did. However the man is responsible for his actions and that includes getting a fertile woman pregnant. If you don't want to it is incumbent on you to take such steps as are necessary to prevent that.




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:19:16 PM)

quote:

reallly??? my intent was to start a flame war?
who did I flame in my original post on this?




http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4481985

quote:

the ONLY one I saw impuning anyones integerty here was you impuning MINE

YOU ATTACKED me IMMEADIALTY!


http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4482272

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4482289

My initial posts to you... neither of which are an attack.




Hillwilliam -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:20:16 PM)

FR on the abortion hijack.

Until the guy is the one who "shits out the watermelon" women will get be the ones to choose.




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:24:35 PM)

Im sorry gentlemen.... this is just an issue I refuse to remain silent about. Had he not attacked women I never would have entered into this discussion on the IRS.

But, to bring it back on topic....

PP does provide adoption referrals and will help a woman who wants to make that decision in her life. When was the last time a right for life group referred a woman for an abortion?

Abortion is a political issue when churches and groups are lobbying congress hard to push their own agenda.

If a RTL group cant bring themselves to refer a woman who obviously wants an abortion to the proper places, then, no, they are not in the business of teaching, they are in the business of furthering their own political agenda.






jlf1961 -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:31:07 PM)

I will not mention any names, since it would violate the TOS, but ladies, gentlemen and tazzy, we do seem to have a new troll in our midst.

Now, as far as pro life groups being investigated by the IRS, it is true, they have been, as has abortion rights groups, civil rights groups, independent social services groups, food pantries, independent welfare agencies, and countless other non profits.

So what the fuck is the problem with the IRS investigating one pro life group? Hell a non-denominational christian aid ministry in town was audited 3 fucking years in a row.

The IRS investigates groups and people. Get the fuck over it.




BitYakin -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:33:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Im sorry gentlemen.... this is just an issue I refuse to remain silent about. Had he not attacked women I never would have entered into this discussion on the IRS.




well I did not attack WOMEN, I did question a system that give women 100% control over something I feel men should have at least some say in

but have it any way you like

and you are right, early on there was no actual attack by you, even if you did imply I didn't know what I was talking about with your SMUG there is a flaw in your logic care to guess what it is comment

ya know what, I'll just do what its clear you would like me to do and admit I am ignornat idiot and bow out and admit men should have NO SAY whatsoever in thier offspring once thier cock is back in thier pants!

HAPPY NOW?




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:50:20 PM)

And you keep attacking.. shall I point out the post that made the first attack?

Of course, why not.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4482600

I really object to having my intelligence questioned. That is a personal attack, one many know I wont silently let slide.

quote:

and you are right, early on there was no actual attack by you, even if you did imply I didn't know what I was talking about with your SMUG there is a flaw in your logic care to guess what it is comment


Pointing out a flaw in someone's logic is not an attack... its just a statement of fact. You insisted upon having a say in your child without ever considering how you would prove its your child before said woman could safely have an abortion.

That is a flaw in that logic.




tazzygirl -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:56:22 PM)

Shades of nikki?




Owner59 -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 8:57:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And you keep attacking.. shall I point out the post that made the first attack?

Of course, why not.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4482600

I really object to having my intelligence questioned. That is a personal attack, one many know I wont silently let slide.

quote:

and you are right, early on there was no actual attack by you, even if you did imply I didn't know what I was talking about with your SMUG there is a flaw in your logic care to guess what it is comment


Pointing out a flaw in someone's logic is not an attack... its just a statement of fact. You insisted upon having a say in your child without ever considering how you would prove its your child before said woman could safely have an abortion.

That is a flaw in that logic.



[sm=applause.gif]




DomKen -> RE: IRS - Selective Prosecution (6/29/2013 10:23:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
If a RTL group cant bring themselves to refer a woman who obviously wants an abortion to the proper places, then, no, they are not in the business of teaching, they are in the business of furthering their own political agenda.

It's worse than that. the forced birthers run the "crisis pregnancy" centers which do nothing but lie and deceive the women who enter.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875