Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The dumbest interpretation


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The dumbest interpretation Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 9:45:50 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

If there is a god responsible for all this, he is one evil sick monster and has a LOT to answer for.

Christians are the same, considering the evils that have caused, its the most vile religion on the planet.


hee hee. Well you are speaking of religion not Christianity. You are speaking of falsehoods, where things are cloaked by something else to encourage you to keep thinking as you do. With that statement, a Christian who actually has THEIR OWN relationship with God, they work on just like they do laundry, or dishes, or college daily, and religion is just a word that holds all kinds of meaning to all kinds of people, whether good or bad. Religion can be very limiting in its self. If you believe as we do though, we do believe that strength comes in numbers, which is where church comes in, thru worship with many. You cant blame a girl for trying though can you? Its to bad you feel the way you do, but we can handle it.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 9:50:01 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Its just that unlike most christians, I am not deeply ignorant of history, science, or reality. And as for the insipid "but I am a good christian" dont forget the nazi and the french who drove the jews out were all devout christians too.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:01:26 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
~FR~

Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:02:43 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Its just that unlike most christians, I am not deeply ignorant of history, science, or reality. And as for the insipid "but I am a good christian" dont forget the nazi and the french who drove the jews out were all devout christians too.



Those people were misled, that was not Christian in any way, shape or form. That's when they didn't use their own good minds and placed more faith in a person, then the light of a calling within there own selves. To much followers, kinda like jumping off a cliff if someone told you too, kind of thing. Or they were ignorant among various other things leading them.

Just as you chose to be educated in history and books, I chose this interpretation in life, and no history book or past tragedy will change my line of thinking, not in a million years. Have a good day.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:21:02 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.


No, I dont care what idiocy people choose to believe, I just start caring when they want public policy based on that idiocy. Like Texas or Iran.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:39:18 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
I see a lot of Christians make this claim, and yet.... I don't see how atheists working to try to keep Christians from imposing their beliefs on them is any kind of crusade. Neither is responding to attacks from Christians, or accepting requests for debates from Christians. Very, very few atheists go around complaining about Christians or trying to bother people into quitting Christianity unprovoked. Pretty much just Richard Dawkins, really.


Obviously, you live in a different country than I do because in the United States in which I live, "Christian" has become an epithet used by many to dismiss ideas of people who claim the title.

In fact, when people are railing against "theists" you can almost bet that they're real issue is Christianity since Judaism and Islam seem to enjoy a "protected" status (as if a person who happens to mention Judaism when speaking against theists is afraid they'll be labeled an anti-semite).

Sorry but I see far more of atheists assailing theists than I see the other way around. Have I had Jehova's Witnesses and Mormans knock on my door? Of course I have and when I say I am not interested, they wish me a good day and move along. While atheists don't go door-to-door they certainly seem to come out of the woodwork to protest any time a belief in a higher power is mentioned (these very boards are a good example).

Personally, I don't think that non-belief in God is going to send you to hell but I have found that certain theist concepts make life a lot more enjoyable; personal property rights, charity, no murder, no stealing, ... you know ... all the little things that would fuck with our day if they went un-checked.

Unforunately, most of the people I've seen that identify as "atheist" don't really seem to have no belief in a higher power, they seem to have an agenda which necessitates the entire obliteration of anyone believing in a higher power. They're "God haters" in my book and maybe I shouldn't lump them in with atheists but they bring it on you, when they identify the way they do; just like WBC gives Christians a "black eye".

In point of fact, most people I've met that seem to not have this agenda of which I spoke are the people that upon finding out that I identify as Gnostic Christian, they ask me what that means and they listen to me. Usually, a very respectful intercourse of questions and answers follows.

Maybe you guys need to shut up the God Haters like we Christians need to shut up the WBC (I'm semi-teasing about shutting them up. I would never stand for that)?


Your impression of the Christian paranoid really nailed it.

In the US atheists are routinely denigrated and maligned in ways if done to any religious group would be a cause for outrage but we are told to shut up and stay the hell out of public life.

There has been a grand total of 1 federal elected official ever who was openly an atheist.

We live in a nation that by it's very foundational document should be areligious, but we have a presidential office of faith based initiatives, religious slogans on our money, a religious reference in the Pledge of Allegiance, Christmas is a national official holiday, churches are tax exempt simply for being churches etc. etc. almost ad infinitum.

Now can anyone actually argue atheists don't have a point when we complain about the amount of religion that is forced upon us?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:42:07 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.

Why is it so important to Theists that people of no faith start believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 10:45:04 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Its just that unlike most christians, I am not deeply ignorant of history, science, or reality. And as for the insipid "but I am a good christian" dont forget the nazi and the french who drove the jews out were all devout christians too.



Those people were misled, that was not Christian in any way, shape or form. That's when they didn't use their own good minds and placed more faith in a person, then the light of a calling within there own selves. To much followers, kinda like jumping off a cliff if someone told you too, kind of thing. Or they were ignorant among various other things leading them.

Just as you chose to be educated in history and books, I chose this interpretation in life, and no history book or past tragedy will change my line of thinking, not in a million years. Have a good day.

That was a classic "No True Scotsman."

The Germans in the 1940's considered themselves good Christians. They went to church and prayed. The Lutherans and Catholics could both point to things written by major theologians supporting what they did, read Martin Luther's writings on Jews if you don't believe me.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:17:55 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
I can agree. I am "NO TRUE SCOTSMAN" I am only half Scot, tyvm.


Martin Luther King was a great man. Lets just put it this way, I am glad not all of us prayed and believed with the leaders of those churches. Never label all Christians the same, as I would not label all atheists the same.

Now go watch some Joyce Meyers on dish network, channel 260 and then you might get this crazy Christian talk.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:19:23 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Many things can be found within religious text to support any position one wishes to take.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:22:36 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I consider myself spiritual, non religious. I do believe in a Higher Power. I do believe in science. Why can't spirituality and science work together to try to answer some of humanities oldest and most important questions?


Because it simply isn't done.

The boards here can back that up, without going further into it.

Happens all the time, part of the problem is that the "Christianity" that many are talking about is evangelical/fundamentalist Christianity, that claims the bible is literal truth from cover to cover. Take a look at the history of science, and you will see something interesting:

-Newton, Boyle and the other founders of the Royal Society in the UK were ordained ministers

-Copernicus was a Catholic Priest

-George Le Maitre, the man who came up with the big bang theory, was a Belgian monk

-Galileo was a religious man, who truly believed in God, unlike the mentally retarded church that persecuted him

For most Christians there is no conflict, because they realize science and religion operate on two different planes. Science strives to say "how", religion is supposed to be more concerned with 'why'. Fundamentalism is abherrent, because it takes religious belief that is supposed to say why and turn it into how; this God becomes this creator in fundies eyes who made man and the earth and so forth the way we would make clay pots, instead of realizing that God the creator doesn't work as we expect, and that evolution and the big bang and so forth, could represent God's creation, too. Fundies took creation myth and try to turn it into 'truth', ans that is the conflict. The Catholic Church ran into that, when it took Ptolemaic thinking and turned it into belief (earth centered solar system, the sun as being 'perfect'), that it didn't give up until 1922, long after both were patently provable untrue; it supposed the Aether theory for some reason for transmission of light, long after Michaelson and Morley proved it didn't exist,and so forth, and a lot of that had to do with church power, not with the teaching.

(in reply to MissAsylum)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:26:52 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissAsylum


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I consider myself spiritual, non religious. I do believe in a Higher Power. I do believe in science. Why can't spirituality and science work together to try to answer some of humanities oldest and most important questions?


Because it simply isn't done.

The boards here can back that up, without going further into it.

Happens all the time, part of the problem is that the "Christianity" that many are talking about is evangelical/fundamentalist Christianity, that claims the bible is literal truth from cover to cover. Take a look at the history of science, and you will see something interesting:

-Newton, Boyle and the other founders of the Royal Society in the UK were ordained ministers

-Copernicus was a Catholic Priest

-George Le Maitre, the man who came up with the big bang theory, was a Belgian monk

-Galileo was a religious man, who truly believed in God, unlike the mentally retarded church that persecuted him

For most Christians there is no conflict, because they realize science and religion operate on two different planes. Science strives to say "how", religion is supposed to be more concerned with 'why'. Fundamentalism is abherrent, because it takes religious belief that is supposed to say why and turn it into how; this God becomes this creator in fundies eyes who made man and the earth and so forth the way we would make clay pots, instead of realizing that God the creator doesn't work as we expect, and that evolution and the big bang and so forth, could represent God's creation, too. Fundies took creation myth and try to turn it into 'truth', ans that is the conflict. The Catholic Church ran into that, when it took Ptolemaic thinking and turned it into belief (earth centered solar system, the sun as being 'perfect'), that it didn't give up until 1922, long after both were patently provable untrue; it supposed the Aether theory for some reason for transmission of light, long after Michaelson and Morley proved it didn't exist,and so forth, and a lot of that had to do with church power, not with the teaching.


This girl is one smart cookie.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:28:05 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
This might be clearer if you gave an example of an atheistic assertion equivalent to "Humans have two arms."


I'm glad you asked here's one. Now to be fair the post you're criticizing could have easily been more clear, however since njlauren IS a kinky christian and presumably aware of the existence of njlauren the position you've assigned them is obviously not what njlauren actually said. You've added ALL to njlauren's position where it's noticeably inappropriate to do so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
quote:

I suspect if you talked to fellow church goers even in a liberal church, about your proclivities in BD/SM, I don't think you would get a very positive reaction, which was my point.

Two thoughts:

(a) That may have been your point, but it's not what you said. You made a bigoted, dismissive statement about all "religious people"--billions of whom, not being Judeo-Christian, don't take their moral cues from the Bible. You're no different than someone generalizing disparagingly about "the blacks" or "the Jews."

(b) What reactions do you get when you disclose your BDSM proclivities to nonreligious vanillas?


(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:36:13 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Yep, clearly christians are science loving, I mean Galileo was celebrated by the church as was Darwin...

Its so fun when you just make shit up. Okay, never should,have,risen...to the bait. I will let the meeting of the flat earth society resume.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:41:29 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
I see a lot of Christians make this claim, and yet.... I don't see how atheists working to try to keep Christians from imposing their beliefs on them is any kind of crusade. Neither is responding to attacks from Christians, or accepting requests for debates from Christians. Very, very few atheists go around complaining about Christians or trying to bother people into quitting Christianity unprovoked. Pretty much just Richard Dawkins, really.


Obviously, you live in a different country than I do because in the United States in which I live, "Christian" has become an epithet used by many to dismiss ideas of people who claim the title.

In fact, when people are railing against "theists" you can almost bet that they're real issue is Christianity since Judaism and Islam seem to enjoy a "protected" status (as if a person who happens to mention Judaism when speaking against theists is afraid they'll be labeled an anti-semite).

Sorry but I see far more of atheists assailing theists than I see the other way around. Have I had Jehova's Witnesses and Mormans knock on my door? Of course I have and when I say I am not interested, they wish me a good day and move along. While atheists don't go door-to-door they certainly seem to come out of the woodwork to protest any time a belief in a higher power is mentioned (these very boards are a good example).

Personally, I don't think that non-belief in God is going to send you to hell but I have found that certain theist concepts make life a lot more enjoyable; personal property rights, charity, no murder, no stealing, ... you know ... all the little things that would fuck with our day if they went un-checked.

Unforunately, most of the people I've seen that identify as "atheist" don't really seem to have no belief in a higher power, they seem to have an agenda which necessitates the entire obliteration of anyone believing in a higher power. They're "God haters" in my book and maybe I shouldn't lump them in with atheists but they bring it on you, when they identify the way they do; just like WBC gives Christians a "black eye".

In point of fact, most people I've met that seem to not have this agenda of which I spoke are the people that upon finding out that I identify as Gnostic Christian, they ask me what that means and they listen to me. Usually, a very respectful intercourse of questions and answers follows.

Maybe you guys need to shut up the God Haters like we Christians need to shut up the WBC (I'm semi-teasing about shutting them up. I would never stand for that)?



Peace and comfort,



Michael



The reason 'Christian' has become an epithet is because of the religious right and the fundamentalist/evangelicals that suddenly, after being dismissed as whack jobs and losers, suddenly became what "Christianity" is. Bans on teaching evolution, the whole creatinism as science clusterfuck, pushing prayer in public school, the need to broadcast prayers, the nastiness towards gays that is the hallmark of these so called "Christians", and the rank hypocrisy of turning Christianity into being anti gay and anti abortion, while totally ignoring what Christians are supposed to do, love others, care for the sick and needy and making sure they are taken care of; the Christian right got so bad that it started preaching 'the gospel of wealth' that proclaimed Jesus wanted us all to be rich (and I am not talking spiritually), that the wealthy were truly blessed by God and that government taxes on the well off (presumably to help the poor) was against God's wishes, and that is sickening to me. Put it this way, you ask most people what they think of evangelical Christians, and they will use words like judgemental, nasty, intolerant, arrogant, pushy , and none of those match what Christ or Christianity taught, but it tells what people are thinking. What is amazing is these are people who claim ultimate faith, how Jesus is their buddy, yet they fight teaching science tooth and nail because it 'undermines' the faith; but if the faith is so strong, then science shouldn't be able to damage it.

The sad part is between the evangelicals and the idiots running the RC, they have turned Christianity from being a positive to being a negative in many people's eyes. A lot of Catholics, other then the true believer, my church right and wrong types, were sickened by the priestly abuse scanda and are also upset that the Bishops have turned being RC into being anti abortion and anti gay; when the fatheads in the US Bishops conference decided to go after an order of nuns who *gasped* spent their time helping the poor and needy but according to those charcoal brains didn't scream and yell loud enough about abortion and gays, it made people look at them as being justa bunch of assholes. People also note the Bishops threaten catholic politicians over same sex marriage and abortion, but when was the last time a Bishop threatened a catholic politicians who wanted to gut to the bone social programs for the poor so the rich could get huge tax breaks ?

The sad part is that most of the people who id as Christian don't fit this mould, but the extremists, the evangelicals and the RC church leaders, have been annointed as being "Christian" and they are dragging everyone else down. The GOP is paying price for this, their social extremism has major turned off young and independant voters, and even a lot of traditional republicans.

Most atheists I know don't denigrate those who believe, there are some, the Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, but they are few.


As far as why other religions get a pass, I wonder how you can say Muslims get a pass, when we have all this hysteria in this country about Muslims trying to establish Sharia law as law, how they are 'taking over', this board and political boards all over are full of the "Muslim" threat. If you think Christians are denigrated, it isn't anything compared to what Muslims face.

Jews get something of a pass, in part because most Jewish groups, even the Orthodox, don't proslytize and don't try to force their beliefs on others, Observant Jews, for example, don't try to get laws passed, as Christians often do, to get things to reflect their beliefs (like no selling beer on Sunday that has a direct religious reason behind it), Jews don't argue, as the ardent Catholic types do on Scotus, that religious and traditional belief and moral law are good bases for civic law. As far as facing criticism, I suggest you do a little googling on anti semitism these days, it is on the rise, in part because many people associate Jews with the banks and Wall Street, the tea partiers aren't just biased against blacks and hispanics, they hate Jews, too.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:48:38 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Why is it so important to Atheists that people of faith stop believing? That is the first thing that jumps to mind when I see discussions like this.


This discussion isn't about any such thing. I'm trying to understand this bizarre incompetence at understanding what we are saying, that's the topic, why when I speak on religion do people hear the dumbest interpretation of my words even when in the context that cannot possibly be what I'm saying?

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:49:00 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Yep, clearly christians are science loving, I mean Galileo was celebrated by the church as was Darwin...

Its so fun when you just make shit up. Okay, never should,have,risen...to the bait. I will let the meeting of the flat earth society resume.

Made shit up? I gave concrete examples of people who were religious and scientists, some of whom were clergy. You are conflating religious belief with religious power, and the two are not the same, which is the point. To denigrate all religious people as non scientific is frankly stupid, because being religious doesn't mean checking your brain at the door, either, despite what the RC leadership claims and what the evangelicals sadly for the most part do, and that is the point. There is no conflict between science and religion, or shouldn't be, simply because they are two different things, and whether organized religion and people feel there is, is irrelevant because those people don't represent even a majority of the faith. Sadly, the religious reich have done some damage with evolution, last polls I showed are that more then half of Americas don't 'believe' in evolution, and primarily it is because of the lies right wing Christians have put out there.

The only legitimate place I can see for religion to have a role in science might be as moral teachers, but you have to be careful about that. Catholic moral teaching is that you cannot perform an abortion on a woman to save her life, yet many would argue letting the woman die is an even worse moral transgression. As we get into eugenics, cloning, and who knows what, morality has a role, in doing what Michael Crichton said far too many scientists do, they say they can do something, but don't ask themselves if they should.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:52:17 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I can agree. I am "NO TRUE SCOTSMAN" I am only half Scot, tyvm.


Martin Luther King was a great man. Lets just put it this way, I am glad not all of us prayed and believed with the leaders of those churches. Never label all Christians the same, as I would not label all atheists the same.

Now go watch some Joyce Meyers on dish network, channel 260 and then you might get this crazy Christian talk.

Not MLK, Martin Luther the founder of Lutheranism and the man who created the Protestant branch of Christianity.

And yes you engaged in the "No True Scotsman" fallacy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 11:57:17 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
On second thought, I'm not taking the bait.


< Message edited by dcnovice -- 7/6/2013 12:19:57 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: The dumbest interpretation - 7/6/2013 12:01:33 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I can agree. I am "NO TRUE SCOTSMAN" I am only half Scot, tyvm.


Martin Luther King was a great man. Lets just put it this way, I am glad not all of us prayed and believed with the leaders of those churches. Never label all Christians the same, as I would not label all atheists the same.

Now go watch some Joyce Meyers on dish network, channel 260 and then you might get this crazy Christian talk.

Not MLK, Martin Luther the founder of Lutheranism and the man who created the Protestant branch of Christianity.

And yes you engaged in the "No True Scotsman" fallacy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman


Nuh uh, no I did not. and if I did SO WHAT??? You can be right as rain, I will let you. This debating the laws of the land, makes a girl tired. I will let the captains take over now, while they are fresh. Don't you worry I will read about MLK.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The dumbest interpretation Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125