Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Thoughts on the treatment of animals.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Thoughts on the treatment of animals. Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 1:33:07 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
I have put this in P and R simply because of the laws involved dealing with animal cruelty. A lot of the stuff that some animal rights organizations put out are way out of date, dealing with practices that have not been used in at least 20 years, if not more.

I have been around animals all my life, dogs, my sister's cats, cattle, horses, and goats.

I broke horses the "smart" way, which involves three steps.

1) Let horse get used to having a saddle on its back.
2) Put burlap feed bag with 100 pounds of sand on saddle, tie it good, and let horse buck against the weight of the sand.

Now, for those that dont know, most predators that prey on horses attack by jumping on their hind quarters or straight onto the back, bucking is instinctive.
3) Once the horse is used to the weight, I got in the saddle and using a fixed loop hackamore with no bit, trained the horse to answer to the reins and pressure on its sides.

When it came to my horses, I was one of those male riders who did not want his nuts cut off, so my stallions never got gelded. Yes that made for a couple of evil tempered studs, but for the most part, they were no trouble, and very gentle with people, all but one of my horses you could put a child on and never worry.

My horses were also working animals, used for roping, herding and cutting.

Growing up, my family owned just over 200 acres. Half of the acreage was in pasture or hay fields, and we usually had any where from fifty to 100 head of cattle at any one time, the rest of the acreage was covered in wild pecan, post oak and mesquite, so we had a lot of deer, wild turkey and other game animals.

Now when it came to cattle, we had 3 stud bulls, and the calves that were born, if male were soon cut to be raised as beef animals.

With the exception of my blue and red heelers, all dogs and cats on the property were spayed an neutered. The heelers were herd dogs and I breed them to sell the pups. I had three males and seven females, each female would be bred once every year, if that often and no more than three females a year. I was informed by a professional breeder that was no way to breed dogs, since it severely limited income potential. Since all my dogs worked, except when carrying a litter, I could not afford to have seven dogs laid up.

I worked at a neighbor's ranch through high school and belonged to the high school rodeo team. I started riding when I was 13, first in ranch rodeos, and then in the "sport" rodeos. Admittedly, my motivation for getting involved in rodeo was the same as the motivation for getting involved in football, purely hormonal. Rodeo riders seemed to get the most attention from the girls, as did football players, being a normal American teenage male, well you figure it out.

Now the man that taught me how to work horses was a full blood Comanche. He taught me that I was working toward having a partner, not a dumb animal. He was also the man that taught me how to train herd dogs, same philosophy. Hence I never used violence on my animals.

As an adult, I was letting a friend live with me and my sister, and when he kicked one of my dogs, he was out on the street that night.

As for rodeo stock, before the SPCA and PETA, rough stock were treated in a way that would turn any persons stomach. It was not uncommon for at least one calf used in a roping event to end up with a broken neck a day for a three or four day event. Spurs used on broncs and bulls had sharp points and always drew blood. The same animals were used every night of a rodeo.

It began to change in the late seventies with the first state and federal Animal Cruelty laws. The laws have gotten stricter and now can include jail or prison time. The PRCA has rules concerning the treatment of rough stock and roping stock in their events. Riders who break those rules are fined and in many cases disqualified.

In another thread I was condemned and attacked for being involved in rodeo. Fine. Most of those people who condemn rodeo, bull riding and bull fighting often enjoy other "civilized" equestrian events.

Ever seen a Tennessee Walking horse, or any horse that uses a high step gait? Ever wonder how they train the horse to do that?

Simple, they take an object about the size of half a golf ball and place it under the frog of a horse's foot. When the horse steps down, the pain forces them to bring the hoof up as high as possible. Doesn't take long for a young horse to develop the habit of walking that way.

In many ways, the techniques used on horses for equestrian events involve pain and negative reinforcement.

As for the cattle industry, PETA still prints articles with fire branding as the primary technique for marking animals. Hate to disappoint you folks that want to believe that. Ear tags are the primary marking technique. They are even introducing RFID chips to mark cattle, and more so since the mad cow disease scare. Using RFID chips, a beef animal can have every step of its movement from the pasture to the meat packer documented, including any and all shots the animal has received.

So forget the branding irons. They are only used on people anymore, considering that some people actually go to a tattoo shop to get branded.

Feed lots are a different story. If you ever get a chance I suggest you make a point to visit one. They are often crowded to the point if one sick animal comes into the system, the entire operation can be contaminated in short order. Animals suffer from hoof rot since they are constantly walking in muck created by their own waste. These are your bulk beef factories, where most of your grocery store steaks, hamburger and other beef products come from.

The biggest beef producer in the US is in Greeley Colorado, which in turn owns Navaho and Digby trucking companies to transport the beef those lots produce.
There are videos of cattle coming out of those lots and into the slaughter house that cannot walk and are being shoved into the kill room with a bulldozer.

For those of you who have never seen a feedlot go here. This gives you an idea of what the operation entails.

My point is that those people who scream about rodeos or circuses being cruel to animals should research the operations which put the meat on their table that they eat, at home and in the restaurants.

Cruelty to Animal laws are there to protect rodeo and circus animals, they do not apply to stock being raised as food.

FYI, feedlots are the primary reason I do not buy beef at a grocery store, I raise two or three steers a year for meat, I buy my chicken from a local producer who does the "free range" thing, and the pork comes from wild hogs that I hunt. Considering some of the stuff I have seen while a truck driver hauling produce and meat, I prefer to raise my own, or buy from farmers I know. I know that is not an option for most of the people on these boards, however, if you can, go to farmer's markets for as much of the food as you can. Beef is produced in every state in the US, including Alaska (I would think it is prefrozen on the hoof.) Look into the possibility that those beef producers actually have their own packing operations, odds are that the beef will be better and less chance of additives being fed to the animals. (ref. Monsanto)

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 1:57:50 AM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
Thanks for letting more urban people in on how food happens and how the riding sports are done now.
PETA may be over the top, but a growing number of us Don't eat meat for both health reasons (Understanding the US corporate food industry and the minuses of bovine meat either treated with the usual hormones and antibiotics or not.) and ethical considerations. I kill local rodents who threaten the actual integrity of my housing and endanger the health of myself and my rescued parrots by destroying and contaminating food and food areas. I don't kill for food when it isn't necessary. I don't practice it but recognize the awareness of those who acknowledge the process by hunting, raising or slaughtering their own food. Responsible choices without denial.
I'm not sure how long the planet can sustain much of anyone eating off the top of a herbivore food chain. The grain to raise a lb of meat is usually figured to be 10 lbs of edible plants that could be feeding people. Individuals can avoid this strain on the ecosystem, cities and countries can't. Nobody wants to talk about the real elephant in the room, 7 billion people on Earth and the increase is speeding up for now.

< Message edited by epiphiny43 -- 7/15/2013 2:17:01 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:05:40 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: epiphiny43

Thanks for letting more urban people in on how food happens and how the riding sports are done now.
PETA may be over the top, but a growing number of us Don't eat meat for both health reasons (Understanding the US corporate food industry and the minuses of bovine meat) and ethical considerations. I kill local rodents who threaten the actual integrity of my housing and endanger the health of myself and my rescued parrots by destroying and contaminating food and food areas. I don't kill for food when it isn't necessary. I don't practice it but recognize the awareness of those who acknowledge the process by hunting, raising or slaughtering their own food. Responsible choices without denial.
I'm not sure how long the planet can sustain much of anyone eating off the top of a herbivore food chain. The grain to raise a lb of meat is usually figured to be 10 lbs of edible plants that could be feeding people. Nobody wants to talk about the real elephant in the room, 7 billion people on Earth and the increase is speeding up for now.



I firmly believe the movie Soylent Green might have been prophetic.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:23:07 AM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
Corporations are eating us all now. It's a small step.
The real reason humans won't be eating each other from prepared sources is the same economics as meat on the hoof, you feed 10 times as many people if you give the plant food directly to people. Quinoa as well as a number of grain combinations are complete protein so that justification of meat is gone.
China, India and African upper and middle class folks figure they are owed the same diet and lifestyle the US and EU now enjoy, even if it ruins the planet. Which that certainly will. It's going to be an interesting few decades. My best friend says, "Who cares, we'll be dead before it gets there." As he's a doctor, it's depressing to hear him say that about all the new advanced therapies.

< Message edited by epiphiny43 -- 7/15/2013 2:24:55 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 7:04:53 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Same people who murder animals to eat go appaplectic over a girls dog and a jar of peanutbutter. So much fun.pointing that out. Same goes for those who bitch about hunting who arent vegetarians.

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 10:15:41 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: epiphiny43

The grain to raise a lb of meat is usually figured to be 10 lbs of edible plants that could be feeding people.

This is one of the main arguments against eating meat which is professed by animal rights groups. The problem with that logic is that land that is used for livestock is typically completely unusable for grain or row crop production.
You have 2 choices with hilly/rocky land. Raise livestock on it or don't use it to produce food at all.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 10:39:01 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
My objection is to CAFO's/feedlots, which are on flatlands.

http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/power-steer/

Garden City, Kan., missed out on the suburban building boom of the postwar years. What it got instead were sprawling subdivisions of cattle. These feedlots—the nation’s first—began rising on the high plains of western Kansas in the 50′s, and by now developments catering to cows are far more common here than developments catering to people.

You’ll be speeding down one of Finney County’s ramrod roads when the empty, dun-colored prairie suddenly turns black and geometric, an urban grid of steel-fenced rectangles as far as the eye can see—which in Kansas is really far. I say “suddenly,” but in fact a swiftly intensifying odor (an aroma whose Proustian echoes are more bus-station-men’s-room than cow-in-the-country) heralds the approach of a feedlot for more than a mile. Then it’s upon you: Poky Feeders, population 37,000. Cattle pens stretch to the horizon, each one home to 150 animals standing dully or lying around in a grayish mud that it eventually dawns on you isn’t mud at all. The pens line a network of unpaved roads that loop around vast waste lagoons on their way to the feedlot’s beating heart: a chugging, silvery feed mill that soars like an industrial cathedral over this teeming metropolis of meat.

Read more: http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/power-steer/

_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 11:00:02 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Meat-eating has always been a messy business, shadowed by the shame of killing and, since Upton Sinclair’s writing of “The Jungle,” by questions about what we’re really eating when we eat meat. Forgetting, or willed ignorance, is the preferred strategy of many beef eaters, a strategy abetted by the industry. (What grocery-store item is more silent about its origins than a shrink-wrapped steak?) Yet I recently began to feel that ignorance was no longer tenable. If I was going to continue to eat red meat, then I owed it to myself, as well as to the animals, to take more responsibility for the invisible but crucial transaction between ourselves and the animals we eat. I’d try to own it, in other words.


_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 12:15:46 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
I'd keep eating red meat. Feed lots aren't ideal but they do not compare to how we industrially raise chicken and pork.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 12:34:48 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Oh, I stopped eating conventionally raised pork years ago after reading this :

http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/an-animals-place/

Piglets in confinement operations are weaned from their mothers 10 days after birth (compared with 13 weeks in nature) because they gain weight faster on their hormone- and antibiotic-fortified feed. This premature weaning leaves the pigs with a lifelong craving to suck and chew, a desire they gratify in confinement by biting the tail of the animal in front of them. A normal pig would fight off his molester, but a demoralized pig has stopped caring. “Learned helplessness” is the psychological term, and it’s not uncommon in confinement operations, where tens of thousands of hogs spend their entire lives ignorant of sunshine or earth or straw, crowded together beneath a metal roof upon metal slats suspended over a manure pit. So it’s not surprising that an animal as sensitive and intelligent as a pig would get depressed, and a depressed pig will allow his tail to be chewed on to the point of infection. Sick pigs, being underperforming “production units,” are clubbed to death on the spot. The U.S.D.A.’s recommended solution to the problem is called “tail docking.” Using a pair of pliers (and no anesthetic), most but not all of the tail is snipped off. Why the little stump? Because the whole point of the exercise is not to remove the object of tail-biting so much as to render it more sensitive. Now, a bite on the tail is so painful that even the most demoralized pig will mount a struggle to avoid it.



_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 1:19:31 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Oh, I stopped eating conventionally raised pork years ago after reading this :

http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/an-animals-place/

Piglets in confinement operations are weaned from their mothers 10 days after birth (compared with 13 weeks in nature) because they gain weight faster on their hormone- and antibiotic-fortified feed. This premature weaning leaves the pigs with a lifelong craving to suck and chew, a desire they gratify in confinement by biting the tail of the animal in front of them. A normal pig would fight off his molester, but a demoralized pig has stopped caring. “Learned helplessness” is the psychological term, and it’s not uncommon in confinement operations, where tens of thousands of hogs spend their entire lives ignorant of sunshine or earth or straw, crowded together beneath a metal roof upon metal slats suspended over a manure pit. So it’s not surprising that an animal as sensitive and intelligent as a pig would get depressed, and a depressed pig will allow his tail to be chewed on to the point of infection. Sick pigs, being underperforming “production units,” are clubbed to death on the spot. The U.S.D.A.’s recommended solution to the problem is called “tail docking.” Using a pair of pliers (and no anesthetic), most but not all of the tail is snipped off. Why the little stump? Because the whole point of the exercise is not to remove the object of tail-biting so much as to render it more sensitive. Now, a bite on the tail is so painful that even the most demoralized pig will mount a struggle to avoid it.





There is one problem with comparing domesticated pigs to "nature." There is only one natural species of wild pig, that is the wild boar. While feral domestic pigs can revert to their wild cousins within a generation, wild boar cannot be domesticated as easily.

Pigs that are raised outside of hog barns are usually leaner and by far more healthy, but the practice of weaning early still continues. Piglets develop teeth early, and by ten weeks they are usually drawing blood when they nurse a sow.

As far as tail biting, sheep will do the same thing, unless like piglets, there is room to move about, hence the problems with hog barns.

Pigs can be raised on land unsuitable for cultivation as easily as sheep, cattle or goats.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 1:59:30 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: epiphiny43

Thanks for letting more urban people in on how food happens and how the riding sports are done now.
PETA may be over the top, but a growing number of us Don't eat meat for both health reasons (Understanding the US corporate food industry and the minuses of bovine meat) and ethical considerations. I kill local rodents who threaten the actual integrity of my housing and endanger the health of myself and my rescued parrots by destroying and contaminating food and food areas. I don't kill for food when it isn't necessary. I don't practice it but recognize the awareness of those who acknowledge the process by hunting, raising or slaughtering their own food. Responsible choices without denial.
I'm not sure how long the planet can sustain much of anyone eating off the top of a herbivore food chain. The grain to raise a lb of meat is usually figured to be 10 lbs of edible plants that could be feeding people. Nobody wants to talk about the real elephant in the room, 7 billion people on Earth and the increase is speeding up for now.



I firmly believe the movie Soylent Green might have been prophetic.

I don't: do you really think that anybody out of their teens is going to be remotely suitable for human consumption?
(SG is another example of a film where the thrust of the novel was radically changed by Hollywood, btw. In Harry Harrison's excellent original tale, everybody was forced onto a vegetarian diet decades ago, hence Charlton Heston's delight at being able to pinch a leg of lamb from a crime scene.)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:06:06 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

Pigs can be raised on land unsuitable for cultivation as easily as sheep, cattle or goats.


They can - but they're not - factory farming now accounts for more than 99 percent of all farmed animals raised and slaughtered in the United States.




Factory Farming

Factory farms, also known as CAFOs (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) or IFAP (Industrial Farm Animal Production) facilities,1 can house more than 125,000 animals2 under one roof and are designed to produce the highest possible output at the lowest possible cost to the operator. These farms and their associated industrial slaughterhouses produce “cheap” meat, eggs, and dairy by externalizing their costs. The costs to the public from the ecological damage and health problems created by factory farms are not considered any more than the law requires, and companies have often found it less expensive to pay fines than to alter their methods. For this reason, the true cost of meat is never reflected in the price consumers pay. Animal suffering is given no meaningful consideration except in a few idiosyncratic cases.

Factory farming now accounts for more than 99 percent of all farmed animals raised and slaughtered in the United States.3 (Virtually all seafood comes to us by way of industrial fishing or factory fish farms.)

Farmed animals are remarkable creatures who experience pleasure (pasture-raised pigs, for instance, are known to jump for joy)4 and have complex social structures (cows develop friendships over time and will sometimes hold grudges against other animals who treat them badly).5 The cheap animal products churned out by factory farms come at a high cost to the animals themselves (many are confined so intensively that they cannot turn around or stretch a wing).6 The structure of factory farming ensures that even the animals’ most fundamental needs—clean air, sunshine, freedom from chronic pain and illness—are denied them.

The present system of producing food animals in the United States is not sustainable and presents an unacceptable level of risk to public health and damage to the environment, as well as unnecessary harm to the animals we raise for food.” –Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production

At the same time, factory farming’s industrial slaughterhouses have created worker conditions that Human Rights Watch describes as “systematic human rights abuses.”7 Employing illegal immigrants and underage workers is a common practice, in part because the vulnerability of these populations allows the industry to avoid compensating them for the numerous injuries and chronic pain that are equally standard in industrial slaughter. Processing-plant line workers in California interviewed by Farm Forward reported, to their shame, that it was not uncommon for them to be denied access to the bathroom in order to “hold the line” and maintain productivity.

The factory farm record on the environment is no better: World Watch, the Sierra Club, the Pew Commission, Greenpeace, and other major environmental watchdogs have singled out factory farms as among the biggest polluters on the planet.8 There is now a scientific consensus that animal agriculture is the single largest contributor to global warming—outstripping even the transportation industry in its production of greenhouse gases.9 A 2008 New York Times article reported that “if Americans were to reduce meat consumption by just 20 percent it would be as if we all switched from a standard sedan—a Camry, say—to the ultra-efficient Prius.”10

The disturbing nature of these problems can make it difficult for many people to accept the truth about factory farming when they are first confronted with it: “Surely,” one is tempted to say, “it can’t be that bad.” But once the scale of the devastation that this industry is wreaking on our health, the environment, and animals becomes clear, the most surprising aspect of factory farming is how effectively these problems have been hidden from the public in the first place.

There are more humane, more just, and more sustainable ways to eat, and, more than ever before, there are numerous, progressive alternatives to factory farms. With your help, we can find a better way forward.

Learn more: http://www.farmforward.com/farming-forward/factory-farming



< Message edited by kalikshama -- 7/15/2013 2:07:43 PM >


_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:28:11 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
FR~

I will continue to eat meat.
The main arguments that veggie people use is that we frequently keep our food animals in unsavoury conditions and that it's cruel to kill animals just for food.
I have no arguments about the fact that some of our animal husbandry is severely lacking.
But it also seems (to me at least) that the main culprits for this are more concentrated in the US than anywhere else in the world.

My counter-argument is that it has been proved that the greenery and plants that we eat also suffers from poor conditions and demonstrably suffer pain. So how is it that a carrot is ok to slaughter by pulling it up, chopping it's lungs off (the leafy bit), skinning it alive (peeling) chopping it into bits or freezing it whilst still alive. If they are babies, we scrub them to insane pain levels (for a plant) then boil them alive!
And we do this sort of thing for all the living plants that we harvest for our use.
How fucking cruel is that???? You wouldn't do that to a living animal FFS!
Just because our human ears can't hear their weak cries we ignore it and turn the other cheek as if it didn't exist.
The attrocities against our plant life are many orders of magnitude worse than what we do with our animals.

And what's even worse, our scientists have started tampering with nature by genetically modifying those plants in vast quantities to produce hideous monsters just for our food chain. At least if they experiment with animals, it's usually on a much smaller scale.
Imagine a company wanting to genetically modify a chicken so it had two separate breasts and four legs with no wings so they could feed the average family of 4 with one bird instead of two??
It would mean that the number of chickens needing to be raised would be instantly halved; ergo, half the feed needed, half the land needed to raise them.
There would be a public outcry against it!!!
But we allow it for our plants???
Awww maaan, somebody really has got their head stuffed up their ass with this one.
Where's the fucking light switch in here??

Despite modern scientific advances, there are some meat proteins that are not replacable by different plant proteins and cannot be manufactured either. There is no other source than from meat.

On top of that, we get the average ignoramous veggie-zealot that ignores the fact that many of the so-called vegetarian alternatives (like TVP) are actually a lot more harmful to us humans than eating the meat they were designed to replace.
Source: http://foodtrainers.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/are-meat-substitutes-worse-than-meat.html

Extract: "...issues with too much of this processed soy are: 91% of soy grown in this country is genetically modified – meaning it is chemically manipulated and loaded with pesticides. Most processed soy is industrially produced using hexane, which may lead to damage of the nervous system if consumed in very large quantities (organic brands, such as Amy’s uses hexane free TVP). Soy contains estrogen-like compounds called phytoestrogens. Doesn’t it seem logical that mangling hormones may pose a problem? And it does, there is evidence that processed soy forms can interfere with thyroid function, cause infertility, disrupt menstrual function and increase risk of breast cancer".

For a great many people who are not affluent enough to pick and choose the very best end of the protein replacement products, they are causing far more harm to themselves than eating meat.
Which, as omnivores, our bodies have evolved to deal with a mixed diet of both sources.
If we were vegetarians/vegans, our bodies would have retained the appendix to process that plant stuff more efficiently.

That's the other side of the coin.

I'll now go tuck into my nice juicy steak 
You can stuff your tofu and soy bean right where the sun don't shine.



< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 7/15/2013 2:34:09 PM >

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:40:09 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
After a year at a yoga community and two years on an ashram, I'm nauseated at the thought of soy. (It took seven years before I was able to eat oatmeal again.)

I eat meat - but not conventionally raised meat, and not meat where antibiotics were used. All the supermarkets I frequent have one line of organic (which is too expensive for me) and/or meat raised with better standards.

http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/power-steer/

...Compared with ground-up cow bones, corn seems positively wholesome. Yet it wreaks considerable havoc on bovine digestion. During my day at Poky, I spent an hour or two driving around the yard with Dr. Mel Metzen, the staff veterinarian. Metzen, a 1997 graduate of Kansas State’s vet school, oversees a team of eight cowboys who spend their days riding the yard, spotting sick cows and bringing them in for treatment. A great many of their health problems can be traced to their diet. “They’re made to eat forage,” Metzen said, “and we’re making them eat grain.”

...What keeps a feedlot animal healthy—or healthy enough—are antibiotics. Rumensin inhibits gas production in the rumen, helping to prevent bloat; tylosin reduces the incidence of liver infection. Most of the antibiotics sold in America end up in animal feed—a practice that, it is now generally acknowledged, leads directly to the evolution of new antibiotic-resistant “superbugs.” In the debate over the use of antibiotics in agriculture, a distinction is usually made between clinical and nonclinical uses. Public-health advocates don’t object to treating sick animals with antibiotics; they just don’t want to see the drugs lose their efficacy because factory farms are feeding them to healthy animals to promote growth. But the use of antibiotics in feedlot cattle confounds this distinction. Here the drugs are plainly being used to treat sick animals, yet the animals probably wouldn’t be sick if not for what we feed them.

I asked Metzen what would happen if antibiotics were banned from cattle feed. “We just couldn’t feed them as hard,” he said. “Or we’d have a higher death loss.” (Less than 3 percent of cattle die on the feedlot.) The price of beef would rise, he said, since the whole system would have to slow down.

“Hell, if you gave them lots of grass and space,” he concluded dryly, “I wouldn’t have a job.”

< Message edited by kalikshama -- 7/15/2013 2:41:17 PM >


_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/15/2013 2:43:24 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

FR~

I will continue to eat meat.
The main arguments that veggie people use is that we frequently keep our food animals in unsavoury conditions and that it's cruel to kill animals just for food.
I have no arguments about the fact that some of our animal husbandry is severely lacking.
But it also seems (to me at least) that the main culprits for this are more concentrated in the US than anywhere else in the world.

Get off your high horse.

Chicken and pig farming in the UK is identical to the US.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/16/2013 2:12:18 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Get off your high horse.

Chicken and pig farming in the UK is identical to the US.

And what the holy fuck has that got to do with murdering and torturing billions of plants every single day?
And allowing our mad scientists to genetically modify them to grotesque levels??

5 GM foods we should never eat: Corn, Soy, Sugar Beets, Aspartame, Canola.
These 5 GM crops make up a considerable proportion of todays food and food ingredients.

Source:
http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/07/15/5-genetically-modified-foods-you-should-never-eat-150434

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/16/2013 2:48:07 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
It seems that you want us to know that you're kind to animals but animal activists are just a bunch of exaggerating fools.

Because I ran an equestrian yard, I sometimes had to stand with a horse whilst it was shot and for insurance purposes of a client, I once attended a horse slaughter in an abattoir. I can honestly say that the horse knew nothing about what was happening and his final moment was nibbling feed from his killers hands. Although I found all of this distressing, it was always done in such a clear and kind way and needed to be done because the horse was incurably sick.

Some years ago I was involved in an investigation which involved the illegal shipping of ponies and horses to France from the UK. Most of these horses were stolen or supposedly out on loan and many were loved pets of both adults and children. The conditions of travel was appalling and many of the horses had broken legs and all were severely dehydrated by the time they reached their destination. Due to these investigations and protests, all horses and ponies in the UK must now have a passport and no abattoir can accept a horse without one.

I also stood at the docks in protest of meat animals being shipped abroad. The conditions of travel were fine in the UK but once out of UK water, the animals often suffered excessively long journeys with no food or water. Meat animals now have to be exported on the hook and not on the hoof.

Lets not assume that all of us who protest for changes in meat animal husbandry are propaganda spreading nutters. People make out that animal right activists are tree hugging vegan hippies and that in itself has come from media propaganda. I have stood in many peaceful protests with people of all ages, bank manages, blue collar workers, school teachers and the like. I have stood with meat eaters, vegans and others that just eat road kill or their own farmed meat. I have witnessed the huge support from passing cars, some which stop and join in. Truth is, all but the sickest amongst us want the slaughter of animals to be humane and as stress free for the animal as possible. Lets not mock those who insist on their voices being heard.

An animal has no voice and sometimes its necessary to speak up on their behalf.






_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/16/2013 6:19:59 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

It seems that you want us to know that you're kind to animals but animal activists are just a bunch of exaggerating fools.

Because I ran an equestrian yard, I sometimes had to stand with a horse whilst it was shot and for insurance purposes of a client, I once attended a horse slaughter in an abattoir. I can honestly say that the horse knew nothing about what was happening and his final moment was nibbling feed from his killers hands. Although I found all of this distressing, it was always done in such a clear and kind way and needed to be done because the horse was incurably sick.

Some years ago I was involved in an investigation which involved the illegal shipping of ponies and horses to France from the UK. Most of these horses were stolen or supposedly out on loan and many were loved pets of both adults and children. The conditions of travel was appalling and many of the horses had broken legs and all were severely dehydrated by the time they reached their destination. Due to these investigations and protests, all horses and ponies in the UK must now have a passport and no abattoir can accept a horse without one.

I also stood at the docks in protest of meat animals being shipped abroad. The conditions of travel were fine in the UK but once out of UK water, the animals often suffered excessively long journeys with no food or water. Meat animals now have to be exported on the hook and not on the hoof.

Lets not assume that all of us who protest for changes in meat animal husbandry are propaganda spreading nutters. People make out that animal right activists are tree hugging vegan hippies and that in itself has come from media propaganda. I have stood in many peaceful protests with people of all ages, bank manages, blue collar workers, school teachers and the like. I have stood with meat eaters, vegans and others that just eat road kill or their own farmed meat. I have witnessed the huge support from passing cars, some which stop and join in. Truth is, all but the sickest amongst us want the slaughter of animals to be humane and as stress free for the animal as possible. Lets not mock those who insist on their voices being heard.

An animal has no voice and sometimes its necessary to speak up on their behalf.


Where did I mention animal activists?

Truth be told I am very much in favor of humane treatment of all animals. PETA are of course scum and deluded fools but the vast bulk of people who work for humane treatment of animals are good people with a noble goal.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Thoughts on the treatment of animals. - 7/20/2013 7:32:26 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have put this in P and R simply because of the laws involved dealing with animal cruelty. A lot of the stuff that some animal rights organizations put out are way out of date, dealing with practices that have not been used in at least 20 years, if not more.

I have been around animals all my life, dogs, my sister's cats, cattle, horses, and goats.

I broke horses the "smart" way, which involves three steps.

1) Let horse get used to having a saddle on its back.
2) Put burlap feed bag with 100 pounds of sand on saddle, tie it good, and let horse buck against the weight of the sand.

Now, for those that dont know, most predators that prey on horses attack by jumping on their hind quarters or straight onto the back, bucking is instinctive.
3) Once the horse is used to the weight, I got in the saddle and using a fixed loop hackamore with no bit, trained the horse to answer to the reins and pressure on its sides.

When it came to my horses, I was one of those male riders who did not want his nuts cut off, so my stallions never got gelded. Yes that made for a couple of evil tempered studs, but for the most part, they were no trouble, and very gentle with people, all but one of my horses you could put a child on and never worry.

My horses were also working animals, used for roping, herding and cutting.

Growing up, my family owned just over 200 acres. Half of the acreage was in pasture or hay fields, and we usually had any where from fifty to 100 head of cattle at any one time, the rest of the acreage was covered in wild pecan, post oak and mesquite, so we had a lot of deer, wild turkey and other game animals.

Now when it came to cattle, we had 3 stud bulls, and the calves that were born, if male were soon cut to be raised as beef animals.

With the exception of my blue and red heelers, all dogs and cats on the property were spayed an neutered. The heelers were herd dogs and I breed them to sell the pups. I had three males and seven females, each female would be bred once every year, if that often and no more than three females a year. I was informed by a professional breeder that was no way to breed dogs, since it severely limited income potential. Since all my dogs worked, except when carrying a litter, I could not afford to have seven dogs laid up.

I worked at a neighbor's ranch through high school and belonged to the high school rodeo team. I started riding when I was 13, first in ranch rodeos, and then in the "sport" rodeos. Admittedly, my motivation for getting involved in rodeo was the same as the motivation for getting involved in football, purely hormonal. Rodeo riders seemed to get the most attention from the girls, as did football players, being a normal American teenage male, well you figure it out.

Now the man that taught me how to work horses was a full blood Comanche. He taught me that I was working toward having a partner, not a dumb animal. He was also the man that taught me how to train herd dogs, same philosophy. Hence I never used violence on my animals.

As an adult, I was letting a friend live with me and my sister, and when he kicked one of my dogs, he was out on the street that night.

As for rodeo stock, before the SPCA and PETA, rough stock were treated in a way that would turn any persons stomach. It was not uncommon for at least one calf used in a roping event to end up with a broken neck a day for a three or four day event. Spurs used on broncs and bulls had sharp points and always drew blood. The same animals were used every night of a rodeo.

It began to change in the late seventies with the first state and federal Animal Cruelty laws. The laws have gotten stricter and now can include jail or prison time. The PRCA has rules concerning the treatment of rough stock and roping stock in their events. Riders who break those rules are fined and in many cases disqualified.

In another thread I was condemned and attacked for being involved in rodeo. Fine. Most of those people who condemn rodeo, bull riding and bull fighting often enjoy other "civilized" equestrian events.

Ever seen a Tennessee Walking horse, or any horse that uses a high step gait? Ever wonder how they train the horse to do that?

Simple, they take an object about the size of half a golf ball and place it under the frog of a horse's foot. When the horse steps down, the pain forces them to bring the hoof up as high as possible. Doesn't take long for a young horse to develop the habit of walking that way.

In many ways, the techniques used on horses for equestrian events involve pain and negative reinforcement.

As for the cattle industry, PETA still prints articles with fire branding as the primary technique for marking animals. Hate to disappoint you folks that want to believe that. Ear tags are the primary marking technique. They are even introducing RFID chips to mark cattle, and more so since the mad cow disease scare. Using RFID chips, a beef animal can have every step of its movement from the pasture to the meat packer documented, including any and all shots the animal has received.

So forget the branding irons. They are only used on people anymore, considering that some people actually go to a tattoo shop to get branded.

Feed lots are a different story. If you ever get a chance I suggest you make a point to visit one. They are often crowded to the point if one sick animal comes into the system, the entire operation can be contaminated in short order. Animals suffer from hoof rot since they are constantly walking in muck created by their own waste. These are your bulk beef factories, where most of your grocery store steaks, hamburger and other beef products come from.

The biggest beef producer in the US is in Greeley Colorado, which in turn owns Navaho and Digby trucking companies to transport the beef those lots produce.
There are videos of cattle coming out of those lots and into the slaughter house that cannot walk and are being shoved into the kill room with a bulldozer.

For those of you who have never seen a feedlot go here. This gives you an idea of what the operation entails.

My point is that those people who scream about rodeos or circuses being cruel to animals should research the operations which put the meat on their table that they eat, at home and in the restaurants.

Cruelty to Animal laws are there to protect rodeo and circus animals, they do not apply to stock being raised as food.

FYI, feedlots are the primary reason I do not buy beef at a grocery store, I raise two or three steers a year for meat, I buy my chicken from a local producer who does the "free range" thing, and the pork comes from wild hogs that I hunt. Considering some of the stuff I have seen while a truck driver hauling produce and meat, I prefer to raise my own, or buy from farmers I know. I know that is not an option for most of the people on these boards, however, if you can, go to farmer's markets for as much of the food as you can. Beef is produced in every state in the US, including Alaska (I would think it is prefrozen on the hoof.) Look into the possibility that those beef producers actually have their own packing operations, odds are that the beef will be better and less chance of additives being fed to the animals. (ref. Monsanto)


Very interesting post. We used to raise horses on a small scale, Tennessee walkers. We showed them for a brief time plantation, not big lick, because of the cruelty I felt involved in it. WIth plantation, I had a very good farrier, who used weighed shoes for training purposes, and no pain was involved in the training of the stallion, gelding, or mare. I admire the way you trained your animals. I prefer the animal keep its spirit if needed, not be a broken unhappy untrusting animal. THey are big, they can kill you if they want, easily. Its not a carnival ride..
I raised Yorkshire terriers for 8 yrs. They were like family, although still, they were kennel dogs and was checked by AKC regularly to ensure standards of living. (these dogs had curtains in their kennel, toys, and treats) THey were very loved and appreciated but they were used for income. Based on their size, past breeding history, past recovery after a litter were the things that I determined how often they were bred. It took me a year and half to find good homes for the adults when I moved. I have two sweet females left, I kept as pets.
I could never manage to raise cows, because I would have put a bell on them and got to attached, so for this reason, I bought meat, rather then raised it. Our neighbors raised all their own meat from chickens to cattle, they were true farmers. They were humane to their animals, but their mind set was for the simplest of things. They knew where their meat came from, what it was fed, how it was treated before consumption. TO them it was just a matter of one of Maslow's pyramid of basic needs. FOOD.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Thoughts on the treatment of animals. Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.133